Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:30:01.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Induced resistance—an innovative approach to manage branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) in hemp and tobacco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Holger Buschmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics (380), University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
Gundula Szinicz
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics (380), University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
Otmar Spring
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany (210), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Joachim Sauerborn
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics (380), University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany

Abstract

This study indicates that induced disease resistance might be useful to control branched broomrape. Strains of the rhizosphere bacteria Pseudomonas spp. (Proradix®), salicylic acid derivates (Bion®), and extracts of the algae Ascophyllum nodosum L. (Goemar Fruton Spezial®) can decrease branched broomrape infection to 80%. Results suggest that agents working as elicitors for resistance in other plant–pathogen interactions by induced systemic resistance or by systemic acquired resistance also could reduce branched broomrape infestation. These findings suggest that activation of immune responses before infection of plants could be an innovative control method for parasitic weeds.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Achuo, E. A., Audenaert, K., Mezians, H., and Höfte, M. 2004. The salicylic acid-dependent defence pathway is effective against different pathogens in tomato and tobacco. Plant Pathol 53:6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokshi, A. I., Morris, S. C., and Deverall, B. J. 2003. Effects of benzothiadiazole and acetylsalicylic acid on beta-1,3-glucanase activity and disease resistance in potato. Plant Pathol 52:2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. L. 1999. The efficacy of acibenzolar-S-methyl, an inducer of systemic acquired resistance, against bacterial and fungal diseases of tobacco. Crop Prot 18:267273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrath, U., Pieterse, C. M. J., and Mauch-Mani, B. 2002. Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 7:210216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischbeck, G., Heyland, K-U., and Knauer, N. eds. 1982. Spezieller Pflanzenbau. Stuttgart, Germany: Ulmer. 394 p.Google Scholar
Friedrich, L., Lawton, K., and Ruess, W. et al. 1996. A benzothiadiazole derivative induces systemic acquired resistance in tobacco. Plant J 10:6170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibot-Leclerc, S., Brault, M., Pinochet, X., and Salle, G. 2003. Potential role of winter rape weeds in the extension of broomrape in Poitou-Charentes. C. R. Biol 326:645658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldwasser, Y., Hershenhorn, J., Plakhine, D., Kleifeld, Y., and Rubin, B. 1999. Biochemical factors involved in vetch resistance to Orobanche aegyptiaca . Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol 54:8796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, J., Volrath, S., and Knauf-Beiter, G. et al. 1996. Benzothiadiazole, a novel class of inducers of systemic acquired resistance, activates gene expression and disease resistance in wheat. Plant Cell 8:629643.Google ScholarPubMed
Gozzo, F. 2003. Systemic acquired resistance in crop protection: from nature to a chemical approach. J. Agric. Food Chem 51:44874503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iriti, M. and Faoro, F. 2003. Benzothiadiazole (BTH) induces cell-death independent resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris against Uromyces appendiculatus . Phytopathol. Z 151:171180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarzynski, O., Descamps, V., Plesse, B., Yvin, J. C., Kloareg, B., and Fritig, B. 2003. Sulfated fucan oligosaccharides elicit defence responses in tobacco and local and systemic resistance against tobacco mosaic virus. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact 16:115122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linke, K. H., Sauerborn, J., and Saxena, M. C. 1989. Orobanche Field Guide. Parasitic Weeds Collaborative Research Program. Hohenheim, Germany: Institute of Plant Production in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Hohenheim; Aleppo, Syria: International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas. 42 p.Google Scholar
Maurhofer, M., Hase, C., Meuwly, P., Metraux, J. P., and Défago, G. 1994. Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHAO: influence of the gacA gene and the pyoverdine production. Phytopathology 84:139146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurhofer, M., Reimann, C., Schmidli-Sacherer, P., Heeb, S. D., Haas, D., and Défago, G. 1998. Salicylic acid biosynthesis genes expressed in Pseudomonas fluorescens strain P3 improve the induction of systemic resistance in tobacco against tobacco necrosis virus. Phytopathology 88:678684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oostendorp, M., Kunz, W., Dietrich, B., and Staub, T. 2001. Induced disease resistance in plants by chemicals. Eur. J. Plant Pathol 107:1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, L., Rodriguez, M. E., Rodriguez, F., and Roson, C. 2003. Efficacy of acibenzolar-S-methyl, an inducer of systemic acquired resistance against tobacco blue mould caused by Peronospora hyoscyami f. sp tabacina. Crop Prot 22:405413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieterse, C. M. J., Van Wees, S. C. M., Ton, J., Van Pelt, J. A., and Loon, L. C. 2002. Signaling in rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Biol 4:535544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieterse, C. M. J., Van Wees, S. C. M., Van Pelt, J. A., Knoester, M., Laan, R., Gerrits, H., Weisbeek, P. J., and Van Loon, L. C. 1998. A novel signalling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 10:15711580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramamoorthy, V., Raguchander, T., and Samiyappan, R. 2002. Induction of defense-related proteins in tomato roots treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 and Fusarium oyxsporum f. sp. lycopersici . Plant Soil 239:5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryals, J., Uknes, S., and Ward, E. 1994. Systemic acquired-resistance. Plant Physiol 104:11091112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauerborn, J. 1991. Parasitic Flowering Plants: Ecology and Management. Weikersheim, Germany: Josef Margraf. 127 p.Google Scholar
Sauerborn, J., Buschmann, H., Ghiasi, K. G., and Kogel, K. H. 2002. Benzothiadiazole activates resistance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) to the root-parasitic weed Orobanche cumana . Phytopathology 92:5964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suo, Y. and Leung, D. W. M. 2002. BTH-induced accumulation of extracellular proteins and blackspot disease in rose. Biol. Plant 45:273279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thangavelu, R., Palaniswami, A., Doraiswamy, S., and Velazhahan, R. 2003. The effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense on induction of defense enzymes and phenolics in banana. Biol. Plant 46:107112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosi, L. and Zazzerini, A. 2000. Interactions between Plasmopara helianthi, Glomus mosseae and two plant activators in sunflower plants. Eur. J. Plant Pathol 106:735744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., and Pieterse, C. M. J. 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 36:453483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieira dos Santos, C. V., Letousey, P., Delavault, P., and Thalouarn, P. 2003. Defense gene expression analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana parasitized by Orobanche ramosa . Phytopathology 93:451457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziadi, S., Barbedette, S., Godard, J. F., Monot, C., Le Corre, D., and Silué, D. 2001. Production of pathogenesis-related proteins in the cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)-downy mildew (Peronospora parasitica) pathosystem treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl. Plant Pathol 50:579586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar