Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:15:12.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicide-Root Rot Interaction in Navy Bean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
William F. Meggitt
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55101

Abstract

Navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings grown in soil treated with EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) were more susceptible to root rot caused by Fusarium solani (Mart.) Appel and Wr. f. phaseoli (Burk.) Snyd. and Hans. than were control seedlings. The navy bean line ‘RRR041,’ which is moderately resistant to root rot, did not show reduced growth when grown in soil infested with F. solani and treated with EPTC. None of the several herbicides tested increased F. solani chlamydospore virulence when grown on potato dextrose agar supplemented with herbicides. No herbicide tested increased F. solani hyphal development in liquid culture or soil. Dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) reduced hyphal development by the greatest amount. Scanning electron micrographs indicated that navy bean plants grown in EPTC had altered hypocotyl surfaces. EPTC and dinoseb increased the exudation of electrolytes, amino acids, and sugars from root and hypocotyl tissue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Altman, J. 1969. Predisposition of sugar beets to Rhizoctonia damping off with herbicides. Phytopathology (Abstr.) 59:1015.Google Scholar
2. Barrons, K.C. 1948. Preemergence weed control. Down Earth 4(3):24.Google Scholar
3. Chappell, W.E. and Miller, L.I. 1956. The effects of certain herbicides on plant pathogens. Plant Dis. Rep. 40:5257.Google Scholar
4. Cook, R.J. and Snyder, W.C. 1965. Influence of host exudates on growth and survival of germlings of Fusarium solani f. phaseoli in soil. Phytopathology 55:10211025.Google Scholar
5. Cook, R.J. and Flentze, N.T. 1967. Chlamydospore germination and germling survival of Fusarium solani f. pisi in soil as affected by soil water and pea seed exudation. Phytopathology 57:178182.Google Scholar
6. Christou, T. and Snyder, W.T. 1962. Penetration and host-parasite relationships of Fusarium solani f. phaseoli in the bean plant. Phytopathology 52:219226.Google Scholar
7. Davis, D. and Dimond, A.E. 1953. Inducing disease resistance with plant growth regulators. Phytopathology 43:137140.Google Scholar
8. Garren, K.H. 1959. An evaluation of role of dinoseb in “nondirting” control for peanut stem rot. Plant Dis. Rep. 43:665667.Google Scholar
9. Hsia, Yu-Tien and Christensen, J.J. 1951. Effect of 2,4-D on seeding blight of wheat caused by Helminthosporium sativum . Phytopathology 41:10111020.Google Scholar
10. Katan, J. and Eshel, Y. 1972. Increase in damping off incidence of pepper caused by diphenamid. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. p. 100101.Google Scholar
11. Lai, M.T. and Semeniuk, G. 1970. Picloram induced increase of carbohydrate exudation from corn seedlings. Phytopathology 60:563564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lockwood, J.L. 1964. Soil Fungistasis. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2:341362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Moore, S. and Stein, W.H. 1948. Photometric ninhydrin method for use in the chromatography of amino acids. J. Biol. Chem. 176:367388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Nash, S.M., Christou, T.C., and Snyder, W.C. 1961. Existence of Fusarium solani f. phaseoli as chlamydospores in soil. Phytopathology 51:302312.Google Scholar
15. Neubauer, R. and Avizohar-Hershenson, Z. 1973. Effect of the herbicide, trifluralin, on Rhizoctonia disease in cotton. Phytopathology 63:651652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Peeples, J.L. and Curl, E.A. 1969. Effect of paraquat, EPTC, and trifluralin on growth of Fusarium oxysporum, f. sp. vasinfectum in liquid culture. Phytopathology (Abstr.) 59:117.Google Scholar
17. Rodriguez-Kabana, R., Curl, E.A., and Funderburk, H.H. Jr. 1969. Effect of trifluralin on growth of Sclerotium rolfsii in liquid culture and soil. Phytopathology 59:223228.Google Scholar
18. Rodriguez-Kabana, R., Curl, E.A., and Peeples, J.L. 1970. Growth response of Sclerotium rolfsii to the herbicide EPTC in liquid culture and soil. Phytopathology 60:431436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Schroth, M.N. and Snyder, W.C. 1961. Effect of host exudates on chlamydospore germination of the bean root fungus, Fusarium solani f. phaseoli . Phytopathology 51:389393.Google Scholar
20. St. John, J.B. and Hilton, J.L. 1973. Lipid metabolism as a site of herbicide action. Weed Sci. 21:477480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Tang, A., Curl, E.A., and Rodriguez-Kabana, R. 1970. Effect of trifluralin on inoculum density and spore germination of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum in soil. Phytopathology 60:10821086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Trevelyan, W.E. and Harrison, J.S. 1952. Studies on yield metabolism. I. Fractionation and microdetermination of cell carbohydrates. Biochem. J. 50:298303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Upstone, M.E. and Davis, J.C. 1967. The effect of simazine on the incidence of American gooseberry mildew on black currants. Plant Pathol. 16:6869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Van Der Zweep, W. 1970. Effects of herbicides on susceptibility of plants to pests and diseases. Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 10:917919.Google Scholar
25. Wyse, D.L., Meggitt, W.F., and Penner, D. Effect of herbicides on the development of root rot on navy bean. Weed Sci. 24:1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Yemm, E.W. and Willis, A.J. 1954. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 57:508514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed