Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:22:43.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of trampling on morphology and ethylene production in asiatic plantain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hiroaki Ikeda
Affiliation:
National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan
Satoru Tsukagoshi
Affiliation:
University Farm, Faculty of Horticulture, Chiba University, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan
Yoshihiro Murata
Affiliation:
University Farm, Faculty of Horticulture, Chiba University, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan
Naoto Sakurai
Affiliation:
University Farm, Faculty of Horticulture, Chiba University, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan
Yutaka Noma
Affiliation:
University Farm, Faculty of Horticulture, Chiba University, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan

Abstract

The effects of simulated trampling on shoot morphology and ethylene production of a trampling-tolerant perennial forb asiatic plantain were investigated. Trampling increased the number of leaves or inflorescences per plant, the petiole diameter, and the leaf blade length to width ratio but decreased the leaf blade width to petiole diameter ratio and the inflorescence length. Ramets subjected to trampling produced more ethylene than did nontrampled ramets originating from the same root crown. Moreover, an ethylene releaser ethephon decreased the leaf blade width to petiole diameter ratio and increased the leaf blade length to width ratio, in a manner similar to the changes induced by trampling. These results suggested that trampling-induced ethylene might be closely related to some of the adaptive morphological changes in asiatic plantain in response to trampling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abeles, F. B., Morgan, P. W., and Saltveit, M. E. Jr. 1992. Ethylene in Plant Biology. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 83119.Google Scholar
Bates, G. H. 1938. Life forms of pasture plants in relation to treading. J. Ecol. 26:452454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, C.W.P.M. 1978. Separate and combined effects of trampling and soil compaction on the growth of four Plantago species on experimental plots. Progress Report. Verh. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Afd. Natuurkd. Tweede Reeks 71:299303.Google Scholar
Boyer, N., De Jaege, G., Bon, M.-C., and Gaspar, Th. 1986. Cobalt inhibition of thigmomorphogenesis in Bryonia dioica: possible role and mechanism of ethylene production. Physiol. Plant. 67:552556.Google Scholar
Boyer, N., Desbiez, M.-O., Hofinger, M., and Gaspar, Th. 1983. Effect of lithium on thigmomorphogenesis in Bryonia dioica . Ethylene production and sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 72:522525.Google ScholarPubMed
Burden, R. F. and Randerson, P. F. 1972. Quantitative studies of the effects of human trampling on vegetation as an aid to the management of semi-natural areas. J. Appl. Ecol. 9:439458.Google Scholar
Engelaar, W.M.H.G. and Blom, C.W.P.M. 1995. Effects of flooding and trampling on the performance of river foreland species of Rumex and Plantago . Acta Bot. Neerl. 44:225245.Google Scholar
Hammer, P. A., Mitchell, C. A., and Weiler, T. C. 1974. Height control in greenhouse chrysanthemum by mechanical stress. Hortscience 9:474475.Google Scholar
Hiraki, Y. and Ota, Y. 1975. The relationship between growth inhibition and ethylene production by mechanical stimulation in Lilium longiflorum . Plant Cell Physiol. 16:185189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, H. and Okutomi, K. 1990. Effects of human trampling and multispecies competition on early-phase development of a tread community. Ecol. Res. 5:4154.Google Scholar
Ikeda, H. and Okutomi, K. 1992. Effects of species interactions on community organization along trampling gradient. J. Veg. Sci. 3:217222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, H. and Okutomi, K. 1995. Effects of trampling and competition on plant growth and shoot morphology of Plantago, Eragrostis and Eleusine species. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44:151160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imaseki, H. 1989. Biosynthesis of ethylene in plants. Chem. Regul. Plant 24:113.Google Scholar
Jaffe, M. J. 1973. Thigmomorphogenesis: the response of plant growth and development to mechanical stimulation. Planta 114:143157.Google Scholar
Jaffe, M. J. 1985. Wind and other mechanical effects in the development and behavior of plants, with special emphasis on the role of hormones. Pages 444484 In Pharis, R. P. and Reid, D. M., eds. Hormonal Regulation of Development III: Role of Environmental Factors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kacperska, A. 1997. Ethylene synthesis and a role in plant responses to different stressors. Pages 207216 In Kanellis, A. K., Chang, C., Kende, H., and Grierson, D., eds. Biology and Biotechnology of the Plant Hormone Ethylene. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Knight, L. I. and Crocker, W. 1913. Toxicity of smoke. Bot. Gaz. 55:337371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, H., and Hori, Y. 1999. Growth analysis and reproductive allocation of Japanese forbs and grasses in relation to organ toughness under trampling. Plant Biol. 1:445452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. C., Brown, K. M., and Emerson, F. H. 1972. Ethylene in the wood of stressed trees. Hortscience 7:175.Google Scholar
Liddle, M. J. 1975. A selective review of the ecological effects of human trampling on natural ecosystems. Biol. Conserv. 7:1739.Google Scholar
Pickard, B. G. 1971. Action potentials resulting from mechanical stimulation of pea epicotyls. Planta 97:106115.Google Scholar
Robitaille, H. A. and Leopold, A. C. 1974. Ethylene and regulation of apple stem growth under stress. Physiol. Plant. 32:301304.Google Scholar
Suge, H. 1978. Growth and gibberellin production in Phaseolus vulgaris as affected by mechanical stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 19:15571560.Google Scholar
Sun, D. and Liddle, M. J. 1993. The morphological responses of some Australian tussock grasses and the importance of tiller number in their resistance to trampling. Biol. Conserv. 65:4349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunohara, Y. and Matsumoto, H. 1997. Comparative physiological effects of quinclorac and auxins, and light involvement in quinclorac-induced chlorosis in corn leaves. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 58:125132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunohara, Y., Matsumoto, H., Ikeda, H., and Noma, Y. 1999. Effect of temperature on quinclorac-induced ethylene production from corn leaves. J. Pestic. Sci. 24:375380.Google Scholar
Sunohara, Y., Usui, K., Matsumoto, H., and Kobayashi, K. 1995. Involvement of ethylene in clomeprop-induced actions in radish seedlings. Weed Res. (Japan) 40:95103.Google Scholar
Takematsu, T. and Ichizen, N. 1987. Weeds of the World I: Sympetalae. Tokyo: Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai. pp. 344345.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. 1980. The geneocology of lawn weeds. VII. The response of different growth forms of Plantago major L. and Poa annua L. to simulated trampling. New Phytol. 85:461469.Google Scholar
Yang, S. F. 1985. Biosynthesis and action of ethylene. Hortscience 20:4145.Google Scholar