Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:20:46.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of 2,4-D on Seed Production and Embryo Development of Curly Dock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. A. Maun  and
P. B. Cavers
M. A. Maun
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
P. B. Cavers
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lithium salt of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) (1000 ppm) was sprayed on plants of curly dock (Rumex crispus L.) 12 days before anthesis, at an thesis, 7 days after anthesis, and 34 days after anthesis. Treatment 12 days before anthesis completely prevented the formation of viable seeds. Two percent of the seeds had minute embryos after treatment at anthesis, but even these seeds did not germinate. Embryos were present in 91% of the seeds from plants treated 7 days after anthesis. These embryos ranged in size from 0.5 to 2.5 mm. The total weight of seeds obtained was significantly less than the control and only 5 to 15% of these seeds were capable of germination. Spraying the inflorescences 34 days after anthesis did not affect the number of seeds produced or seed viability. Almost all plants remained alive after the harvest.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 533 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cavers, P. B. and Harper, J. L. 1964. Biological flora of the British Isles. Rumex obtusifolius L. and Rumex crispus L. J. Ecol. 52:737–766.Google Scholar
2. Crafts, A. S. 1961. The Chemistry and Mode of Action of Herbicides. Interscience Publishers, New York, 269 p.Google Scholar
3. Evans, R. A., Kay, B. L., and McKell, C. M. 1963. Herbicides to prevent seed set or germination of medusahead. Weeds 11:273–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Powell, J. B. and Taylorson, R. B. 1967. Induced sterility and associated effects of dimethylarsinic acid treatment of pearl millet. Crop Sci. 7:670–672.Google Scholar
5. Rehm, S. 1952. Male sterile plants by chemical treatment. Nature 170:38–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Rojas-Garciduenas, M. and Kommedahl, T. 1958. The effects of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid on radicle development and stem anatomy of soybean. Weeds 6:49–51.Google Scholar
7. Rojas-Garciduenas, M. and Kommedahl, T. 1960. The effect of 2,4-D on germination of pigweed seed. Weeds 8:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Schreiber, M. M. 1967. A technique for studying weed competition in forage legume establishment. Weed Sci. 15:1–4.Google Scholar
9. Taylorson, R. B. 1966. Control of seed production in three annual grasses by dimethylarsinic acid. Weeds 14:207–210.Google Scholar