Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:53:25.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Herbicide and Manure Applications on Soil Chemistry and Growth of Fieldbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Laura S. Quakenbush  and
Robert G. Wilson
Laura S. Quakenbush
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of manure and herbicide applications on weed-free fieldbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and root rot of fieldbeans was studied during 1978 and 1979 at Scottsbluff, Nebraska. Rates of cattle feedlot manure used were 0, 30000, 56000, 112000, or 168000 kg/ha. Preplant herbicide treatments used were alachlor [2-chloro-2′6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] at 3.4 kg/ha, EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) at 3.4 kg/ha, EPTC + trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) at 2.2 + 0.6 kg/ha, or dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) at 6.7 kg/ha. Manure rates of 56000 kg/ha or higher reduced fieldbean yields both years, but did not increase electrical conductivity or soil exchangeable sodium enough to explain these yield reductions. In 1978, but not in 1979, height and yield of weed-free fieldbeans were reduced by EPTC, EPTC + trifluralin, and alachlor treatments. A significant interaction between manure and herbicide treatments was not detected and none of the treatments increased the severity of root rot in either year.

Keywords

Fusarium solaniEPTCtrifluralinalachlordinoseb
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , July 1981 , pp. 508 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alexander, M. 1977. Introduction to Soil Microbiology. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 467 pp.Google Scholar
2. Berstein, L. 1974. Salt tolerance of plants. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bull. 2838. 23 pp.Google Scholar
3. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. 1957. Pages 306–309 in Experimental Designs, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Coyne, D. P. 1977. Dry edible beans. Pages 70–71 in Williams, J. H. and Murfield, D., eds. Agricultural Atlas of Nebraska. Univ. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
5. Horton, M. L., Schnabel, R. R., and Wiersma, J. L. 1977. Soil and crop response to applied animal waste. Pages 703–712 in Loehr, R. C., ed. Land as a Waste Management Alternative. Proc. 1976 Cornell Agric. Waste Management Conf. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar
6. Katan, J. and Eshel, Y. 1973. Interactions between herbicides and plant pathogens. Residue Rev. 45:145–177.Google Scholar
7. Mathers, A. C. and Stewart, B. A. 1971. Crop production and soil analyses as affected by applications of cattle feedlot wastes. Pages 229–234 in Int. Symp. Livestock Wastes. Publication of Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
8. Maurer, C. L. and Baker, R. 1965. Ecology of plant pathogens in soil. II. Influence of glucose, cellulose, and inorganic nitrogen amendments on development of bean root rot. Phytopathology 55:69–72.Google Scholar
9. Parochetti, J. V. 1973. Soil organic matter effect on activity of acetanilides, CDAA, and atrazine. Weed Sci. 21:157–160.Google Scholar
10. Snyder, W. C., Schroth, M. N., and Christou, T. 1959. Effect of plant residues on root rot of beans. Phytopathology 49:755–756.Google Scholar
11. Steadman, J. R., Kerr, E. D., and Mumm, R. F. 1975. Root rot of bean in Nebraska: primary pathogen and yield loss appraisal. Plant Dis. Rep. 59:305–308.Google Scholar
12. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10: 9–14.Google Scholar
13. Wallingford, T. W., Powers, W. L., Murphy, L. S., and Manges, H. L. 1977. Salt accumulation in soil as a factor determining application rates of beef-feedlot manure and lagoon water. Pages 713–726 in Loehr, R. C., ed. Land as a Waste Management Alternative. Proc. 1976 Cornell Agric. Waste Management Conf. Google Scholar
14. Weber, J. B., Weed, S. B., and Waldrep, T. W. 1974. Effect of soil constituents on herbicide activity in modified-soil field plots. Weed Sci. 22:454–459.Google Scholar
15. Weinke, K. E. 1962. The influence of nitrogen on the root disease of bean caused by Fusarium solani f. phaseoli . Phytopathology 52:757 (Abstract).Google Scholar
16. Wyse, D. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of herbicides on the development of root rot on navy beans. Weed Sci. 24:11–15.Google Scholar