Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:14:44.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Application Timing on Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control with DPX-V9360

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Timothy T. Obrigawitch ,
William H. Kenyon  and
Henry Kuratle
Timothy T. Obrigawitch
Affiliation:
Agric. Prod. Dep., Stine-Haskell Res. Ctr., E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Newark, DE 19714
William H. Kenyon
Affiliation:
Agric. Prod. Dep., Stine-Haskell Res. Ctr., E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Newark, DE 19714
Henry Kuratle
Affiliation:
Agric. Prod. Dep., Stine-Haskell Res. Ctr., E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Newark, DE 19714
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field, greenhouse, and laboratory studies were conducted to examine the effect of application timing on the activity of DPX-V9360 on rhizome johnsongrass. Field and greenhouse studies indicated that johnsongrass treated with postemergence applications of DPX-V9360 at late growth stages (>5 leaves) was controlled more effectively than when treated in early growth stages (<5 leaves). Johnsongrass control was optimized with split-postemergence applications (treatments applied at early and late growth stages) in field studies compared to a single postemergence application at either early or late growth stages. The pattern of translocation of 2-14C (pyrimidine)-labeled DPX-V9360 applied to a fully expanded johnsongrass leaf did not differ significantly between three different growth stages of 10-, 30-, and 60-cm height. Over 60% of the absorbed 14C remained in the treated leaf. Most of the translocated 14C moved out of the treated leaf within 3 days after application and distributed to the shoot in greater quantities than to the rhizomes. About 40% of 14C-DPX-V9360 applied to the leaf surfaces of a tolerant species (corn) or susceptible species (johnsongrass) was absorbed into the leaf. Corn metabolized over 90% of absorbed DPX-V9360 within 20 h, while there was no perceptible metabolism of DPX-V9360 in johnsongrass leaves after 24 h. Late growth stage and split-postemergence applications appear to provide more effective control than early growth stage applications because of better control of regrowth (new shoot emergence from rhizomes after application) and because tillering and plant emergence are more nearly complete at application time.

Keywords

DPX-V9360, 3-pyridinecarboxamide, 2-(((4,6-dimethoxy-pyrimidin-2-yl)amino-carbonyl))aminosulfonyl)))-N,N-dimethylcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3378′johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. ♯3 SORHARhizomeapplication timingpostemergencetranslocationmetabolismZea maysSORHA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 45 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. Agricultural Research Service, USDA 1970. Selected Weeds of United States. Agric. Handb. No. 366. 463 pp.Google Scholar
2. Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Weed-Crop Ecology. Breton Publishers, North Scituate, MA. Pages 93–117.Google Scholar
3. Banks, P. A. and Tripp, T. N. 1983. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in soybeans with foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 31: 628–633.Google Scholar
4. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. Pages 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. 3rd ed. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
5. Dale, J.E. and Chandler, J. M. 1979. Herbicide-crop rotation for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control. Weed Sci. 27:479–485.Google Scholar
6. Gordon, D. T. and Nault, L. R. 1977. Involvement of maize chlorotic dwarf virus and other agents in stunting diseases of Zea mays in the United States. Phytopathology 67:27–36.Google Scholar
7. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI. 609 pp.Google Scholar
8. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1979. Influence of planting date on the growth of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) from seed. Weed Sci. 27: 554–558.Google Scholar
9. Kuratle, H., Hanagan, M., Kenyon, W. H., and Strachan, S. D. 1988. DPX-V9360 – A new selective postemergence grass herbicide for corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28:12–13.Google Scholar
10. Mattioli, A. J. 1978. Distribution in depth of the rhizomes of Aleppo grass in maize and soybean stubble. Bolsa de Cereales 105:10–14.Google Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. 1961. Morphology and development of johnsongrass plants from seeds and rhizomes. Weeds 9:558–562.Google Scholar
12. McWhorter, C. G. 1961. Carbohydrate metabolism of johnsongrass as influenced by seasonal growth and herbicide treatments. Weeds 9: 563–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McWhorter, C. G. 1972. Factors affecting johnsongrass rhizome production and generation. Weed Sci. 20:41–45.Google Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G. 1974. Water-soluble carbohydrates in johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 22:159–163.Google Scholar
15. Millhollon, R. W. 1985. Progressive kill of rhizomatous johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with repeated treatment with dalapon, MSMA, or asulam. Weed Sci. 33:216–221.Google Scholar
16. Perry, K. M., Evans, R., and Jeffery, L. S. 1983. Competition between johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and corn (Zea mays). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:345.Google Scholar
17. Stevens, W. E., Johnson, J. R., and Horst, H. R. 1986. Preemergence and preplant incorporated herbicides for control of johnsongrass in corn. Res. Rep.–Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn. V II(6). 2 pp.Google Scholar