Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:13:24.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics and New Alternatives in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Weed Management Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Paolo Nastasi ,
Robert Frans  and
Marilyn McClelland
Paolo Nastasi
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Robert Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Marilyn McClelland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1982 and 1983 in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to evaluate alternatives in grass weed management programs with the use of postemergence herbicides and to assess the economic potential for incorporating the new over-the-top grass weed herbicides into total cotton production practices. Twelve weed management systems using the grass herbicides sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} and fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid} were compared to six standard systems. Differences in cotton production costs among the 18 systems were due to cost differences in total weed management. Equal or greater net return values were obtained when over-the-top herbicides followed fluometuron {N,N-dimethyl-N′-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)urea} preemergence or when these materials were applied twice compared to the over-the-top materials used in conjunction with trifluralin [2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine] preplant incorporated or with directed postemergence materials. High net returns were the result of both high seed cotton yields and low total production costs.

Keywords

Herbicidessethoxydimfluazifopfluometuronnet returnsproduction coststrifluralinDIGSAELEINBRAPP
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , July 1986 , pp. 634 - 638
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149–154.Google Scholar
2. Chandler, J. M. 1984. Perennial grass control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:27.Google Scholar
3. Derr, J. F., Monaco, T. J., and Sheets, T. J. 1984. Response of three annual grasses to fluazifop-butyl. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:51.Google Scholar
4. Gowgani, G. and Falconer, R. 1984. A comparison of several new postemergence grass herbicides. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 30.Google Scholar
5. Harris, V. C. 1960. Weed control in cotton over a ten-year period by use of more promising materials and techniques. Weeds 8:616–625.Google Scholar
6. Holstun, J. T. Jr., Wooten, O. B. Jr., McWhorter, C. G., and Crowe, G. B. 1960. Weed control practices, labor requirement, and costs in cotton production. Weeds 8:232–234.Google Scholar
7. Jordan, J. H. and Kurtz, M. E. 1984. Selective grass herbicides and fluometuron for bermudagrass control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:26.Google Scholar
8. Kurtz, M. E. and Jordan, J. H. 1984. Mixtures of over-the-top grass herbicides and dimethoate for johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.]. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:27.Google Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. and Shaw, W. C. 1982. Research needs for integrated weed management systems. Suppl. Weed Sci. 30:40–45.Google Scholar
10. Probst, G. W., Golab, T., Herberg, R. J., Holzer, F. J., Parka, S. J., Van Der Schans, C., and Tepe, J. B. 1967. Fate of trifluralin in soils and plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15:592–599.Google Scholar
11. Snipes, E. C., Walker, R. H., Whitwell, T., Buchanan, G. A., McGuire, J. A., and Martin, N. R. 1984. Efficacy and economics of weed control methods in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 32:95–100.Google Scholar
12. Stewart, P. S., Frans, R. E., and May, R. 1983. An economic comparison of weed-control systems in Arkansas cotton. Rep. Ser. 279. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Fayetteville.Google Scholar
13. Whitwell, T. and Brown, S. M. 1984. Pre- and post-herbicide combinations for weed control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:29.Google Scholar