Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:20:42.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Droplet and Vapor Drift from Butyl Ester and Dimethylamine Salt of 2,4-D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. Grover ,
J. Maybank  and
K. Yoshida
R. Grover
Affiliation:
Res. Sta., Canada Dep. Agr., Regina, Saskatchewan
J. Maybank
Affiliation:
Saskatchewan Research Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
K. Yoshida
Affiliation:
Saskatchewan Research Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relative drift of droplet and vapor of butyl ester and dimethylamine formulations of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) was determined under conventional crop spraying procedures in the field. Labelled herbicides were mixed with spray solution or emulsion, and the ground deposit and the air-borne droplet and vapor clouds drifting from the target area were collected. The mass of the dimethylamine formulation drifting as droplets was 3 to 4% of the material sprayed. No significant amounts of this material were collected as vapor or particulate drift. For the butyl ester, in addition to the droplet drift, 25 to 30% of the material was collected as vapor drift in the half hour after spraying. Thus the drift potential from the butyl ester was about 8 to 10 times greater than that from the dimethylamine formulation under the conditions of these tests.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , July 1972 , pp. 320 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, D. F., Jackson, C. M., and Bamesberger, W. L. 1964. Quantitative studies of 2,4-D esters in the air. Weeds 12: 280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dabbs, D. H. and Forsberg, D. E. 1957. Effect of 2,4-D on tomatoes. Res. Rep. Nat. Weed Comm. (Canada), West. Sect. p. 107–108.Google Scholar
3. Day, B. E., Johnson, E., and Dewlen, J. L. 1959. Volatility of herbicides under field conditions. Hilgardia 28:255–267.Google Scholar
4. Greenshields, J. E. R. and Putt, E. D. 1958. The effect of 2,4-D spray drift on sunflowers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 38: 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Greenshields, J. E. R. and White, W. J. 1954. The effect of 2,4-D spray drift on sweet clover plants in the record year of growth. Can. J. Agr. Sci. 34:389–392.Google Scholar
6. Grover, R. 1970. Herbicides and air pollution. 24th Annual meeting, Nat. Weed Comm. (Canada), West. Sect., p. 40–41.Google Scholar
7. Hamaker, J. W. and Kerlinger, H. O. 1969. Vapor pressure of pesticides, p. 39–54. In Gould, R. F. (ed.) Pesticidal Formulation Research. Adv. Chem. Ser., No. 86, Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
8. Hay, J. R. and Grover, R. 1967. Recovery of 2,4-D from atmosphere. 21st Annual meeting, Nat. Weed Comm. (Canada), West. Sect., p. 43.Google Scholar
9. Jensen, D. J. and Schall, E. D. 1966. Determination of vapor pressures of some phenoxyacetic herbicides by gas-liquid chromatography. J. Agr. Food Chem. 14:123–126.Google Scholar
10. Marth, P. C. and Mitchell, J. W. 1948. Comparative volatility of various forms of 2,4-D. Bot. Gaz. 110:632–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Maybank, J. and Yoshida, K. 1969. Delineation of herbicide-drift hazards on the Canadian prairies. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 12:759–762.Google Scholar
12. Phipps, H. M. 1963. The role of 2,4-D in the appearance of a leaf blight of some plain tree species. Forest Sci. 9:283–288.Google Scholar
13. Potts, S. F. 1963. Treating woody plants with herbicides in proximity to sensitive crops. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 16:269–270.Google Scholar
14. Potts, S. F. 1963. Spraying herbicides on woody plants near sensitive crops. Agr. Chem. 18(8):52, 83–84.Google Scholar