Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T07:15:19.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Response of Wild Oat Lines to Diallate, Triallate, and Barban

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ruben Jacobsohn  and
Robert N. Andersen
Ruben Jacobsohn
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Robert N. Andersen
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, St. Paul, Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluated 214 lines of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) for response to S-2,3-dichloroallyl N,N-diisopropylthiolcarbamate (diallate), S-2,3,3-trichloroaHyl N,N-diisopropylthiolcarbamate (triallate), and 4-chloro-2-butynl m-chlorocarbanilate (barban). We found large differences among the lines in response to these herbicides and some lines that might not be controlled by recommended rates of these herbicides. Frequency distributions of response to herbicides suggest that reaction to these three herbicides is quantitatively inherited. We were unable to establish a relationship between morphological characteristics and plant response to these herbicides.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 491 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abel, A. L. 1954. The rotation of weed killers. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 2:249–255.Google Scholar
2. Harper, J. C. 1956. The evolution of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicide. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 3:179–186.Google Scholar
3. Hayes, J. D., Peiffer, R. K., and Rana, M. S. 1965. The genetic response of barley to DDT and barban and its significance in crop protection. Weed Res. 5:191–206.Google Scholar
4. Lindsay, D. R. 1965. Taxonomic and genetic studies on wild oats (A. fatua L.). Weeds 4:1–10.Google Scholar
5. Roche, B. F. and Muzik, T. J. 1964. Ecological and physiological study of Echinochola crusgalli (L). Beauv. and the response of its biotypes to sodium 2,2-dichloropropionate (dalapon). Agron. J. 56:155–160.Google Scholar
6. Rydrych, D. J. and Seely, C. I. 1964. Effect of IPC on selections of wild oats. Weeds 12:265–267.Google Scholar
7. Santelmann, P. W. and Meade, J. A. 1961. Variation in morphological characteristics and dalapon susceptibility within the species Setaria lutescens and S. faberii . Weeds 9:406–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar