Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:11:38.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of allelochemicals in spring cereal cultivars of different competitiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ali Baghestani ,
Claudel Lemieux ,
Gilles D. Leroux ,
Regis Baziramakenga  and
Regis R. Simard
Ali Baghestani
Affiliation:
Department of Phytology, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4
Gilles D. Leroux
Affiliation:
Department of Phytology, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4
Regis Baziramakenga
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Boulevard, Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1V 2J3
Regis R. Simard
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Boulevard, Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1V 2J3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Competitive cereal cultivars are less susceptible than others to weed interference. Their characterization may provide selection criteria that can be used as guidelines to develop new, even more competitive cultivars. Root exudates are a potential means by which competitive cultivars reduce weed growth. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of cereal root exudates on Brassica kaber (DC.) L. C. Wheeler growth, to isolate and characterize the allelochemical compounds released by spring cereal cultivars, and to determine if a relation exists between these allelochemicals and cultivar competitiveness. Highly competitive (HC) and lesser competitive (LC) cultivars of four crop kinds (Triticum aestivum L. [wheat], Avena sativa L. [wild oat], two- and six-rowed Hordeum vulgare L. [barley]) were selected based on previous work. Exudates from undisturbed root systems of B. kaber and cereals were collected and used in a bioassay test with B. kaber. Root exudates were analyzed for 16 common phenolic compounds using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Bioassays indicated that cereal exudates had no negative effect on B. kaber germination, but all concentrations of cereal root exudates inhibited B. kaber root and hypocotyl growth. As cereal root exudate concentration increased, B. kaber growth decreased. For each crop kind, B. kaber growth inhibition was greater with HC cultivars than with LC cultivars. The root exudates of all crop kinds and cultivars contained benzoic, caffeic, ferulic, o-coumaric, and vanillic acids as well as scopoletin. Para-hydroxybenzoic acid was found in exudates from T. aestivum, A. sativa, and two-rowed H. vulgare cultivars. Para-coumaric acid was not identified in root exudates from LC H. vulgare cultivars. Gentisic acid was produced by A. sativa and H. vulgare. Vanillic and o-coumaric acids along with scopoletin may be responsible for the allelopathic effects of H. vulgare, T. aestivum, and A. sativa cultivars. These three compounds may be useful as possible indicators of allelopathic potential of genotypes under development and thus considered for use in breeding programs.

Keywords

Avena sativa L., oatstwo- and six-rowed Hordeum vulgare L., barleyTriticum aestivum L., wheatBrassica kaber (DC.) L. C. Wheeler SINAR, wild mustardAllelopathycompetitionphenolic compoundsroot exudatesphytotoxicitybioassaycerealscompetitivenoncompetitiveSINAR
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 5 , October 1999 , pp. 498 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barnes, J. P., Putnam, A. R., Burke, B. A., and Aasen, A. J. 1987. Isolation and characterisation of allelochcmical in rye herbage. Phytochemistry 26:1385–1390.Google Scholar
Baziramakenga, R., Simard, R. R., and Leroux, G. D., 1995. Determination of organic acids in soil extracts by ion chromatography. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27:349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Hammouda, M., Kremer, R. J., Minor, H. C., and Sarwar, M. 1995a. A chemical basis for differential allelopathic potential of sorghum hybrids on wheat. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:775–786.Google Scholar
Ben-Hammouda, M., Kremer, R. J., and Minor, Harry C. 1995b. Phytotoxicity of extracts from sorghum plant compounds on wheat seedlings. Crop Sci. 35:1652–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, U., Wentworth, T. R., Klein, K., Worsham, A. D., King, L. D., Gerig, T. M., and Lyu, S. W. 1991. Phenolic acid content of soils from wheat no till, wheat-conventional till, and fallow-conventional till soybean cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:1045–1068.Google Scholar
Challaiah, O. C. Burnside, G. A. Wicks, and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34:689–693.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. 1995. Weed suppression ability of spring barley varieties. Weed Res. 35:241–247.Google Scholar
Einhellig, F. A. 1996. Interaction involving in cropping systems. Agron. J. 88:886–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M., Weston, L. A., Snyder, J. C., and Regnier, E. E. 1996. Allelopathic influence of germinating seeds and seedlings of cover crops on weed species. Weed Sci. 44:579–584.Google Scholar
Huel, D. G. and Hucl, P. 1996. Genotypic variation for competitive ability in spring wheat. Plant Breed. 155:325–329.Google Scholar
Jobidon, R., Thibault, J. R., and Fortin, J. A. 1989. Phytotoxic effect of barley, oat and wheat-straw mulches in eastern Quebec forest plantation. 1. Effect on red raspberry (Rubus idaeus). For. Ecol. Manag. 29:277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemerle, D. 1996. The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res. 36:505–513.Google Scholar
Liu, D. L. and Lovett, J. V. 1993. Biologically active secondary metabolites of barley. I. Developing techniques and assessing allelopathy in barley. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:2217–2230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason-Sedun, W., Jessop, R. S., and Lovett, J. V. 1986. Differential phytotoxicity among species and cultivars of the genus Brassica to wheat. I. Laboratory and field screening of species. Plant Soil 93:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panasiuk, O., Bills, D. D., and Leather, G. R. 1986. Allelopathic influence of Sorghum bicolor on weeds during germination and early development of seedlings. J. Chem. Ecol. 12:1543–1553.Google Scholar
Perez, F. J. and Ormeño-Nuñez, J. 1991a. Difference in hydroxamic acid content in roots and root exudates of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rye (Secale cereale L.): possible role in allelopathy. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:1037–1043.Google Scholar
Pérez, F. J. and Ormeño-Nuñez, J. 1991b. Root exudates of wild oats: allelopathic effects on spring wheat. Phytochemistry 30:2199–2202.Google Scholar
Preradov-Odobasic, A. 1997. Évaluation des cultivars de céréales de printemps à l'égard des mauvaises herbes. Mémoire de maǐtrise. Dépatement de phytologie, Université Laval, Canada. 86 p.Google Scholar
Rice, E. L. 1984. Allelopathy. 2nd ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 1–7, 41–67, 306–307.Google Scholar
Rizvi, S.J.H. and Rizvi, V. 1992. Allelopathy Basic and Applied Aspects. New York: Chapman and Hall, pp. 456–460.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, pp. 891–996.Google Scholar
Satorre, E. H. and Snaydon, R. W. 1992. A comparison of root and shoot competition between spring cereals and Avena fatua L. Weed Res. 32:45–55.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 173–175, 471–472.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Murphy, S. D. 1996. The role of integrated weed management (IWM) in agroecosystem health. Weed Sci. 44:437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, C. and Young, C. C. 1982. Collection and identification of allelopathic compounds from the undisturbed root system of bigalta limpograss (Hemarthria altissima). Plant Physiol. 69:155–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wicks, G. A., Ramsel, R. E., Nordquist, P. T., Schmidt, J. W., and Challaiah, . 1986. Impact of wheat cultivars on establishment and suppression of summer annual weeds. Agron. J. 78:59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wòjcik-Wojtkowiak, D., Politycka, B., Schneider, M., and Perkowski, J. 1990. Phenolic substances as allelopathic agents arising during the degradation of rye (Secale cereale) tissues. Plant Soil 124:143–147.Google Scholar
Yu, J. Q. and Matsui, Y. 1994. Phytotoxic substances in root exudates of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L). J. Chem. Ecol. 20:21–31.Google Scholar