Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:52:32.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Six Morningglory (Ipomoea) Species in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. D. Mathis  and
L. R. Oliver
W. D. Mathis*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Altheimer Lab., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
L. R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Altheimer Lab., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Field Res. Rep., Rohm and Haas, Monroe, LA 71203
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 4-yr field test was initiated in 1975 to determine susceptibility of a natural infestation of six morningglory species to herbicides which can be applied to the soil and foliage in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. The species studied were pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.), entireleaf morningglory [Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. var. integriuscula], ivyleaf morningglory [Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq.], purple moonflower [Ipomoea muricata (L.) Jacq.], palmleaf morningglory [Ipomoea wrightii (Gray)], and small flower morningglory [Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Griseb.]. Control with herbicides applied preplant incorporated and preemergence was dependent on morningglory species and on rainfall to allow plant uptake of the herbicide. Herbicides applied to the soil were not as effective as those applied postemergence. Oxadiazon [2-tert-butyl-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-δ2-1,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one] gave the best and longest lasting preemergence control, averaging 79% control for all species. Preemergence control with metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] was dependent on species, with 84% control of small flower morningglory and only 26% for ivyleaf and 18% for entireleaf morningglory. At V2 (one trifoliolate) and V5 stages of soybean growth, acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid} at 0.56 kg/ha applied over-the-top and oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene] at 0.28 kg/ha applied post-directed gave 90 and 92% control of all species, respectively. Most effective were repeated post-directed applications at V5 and V7 stages of soybean growth. Metribuzin + 2,4-DB [4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butyric acid] (99%), linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea] + 2,4-DB (98%), 2,4-DB (95%), and paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion) + 2,4-DB (93%) provided excellent control regardless of the morningglory species.

Keywords

Herbicide susceptibilitynatural infestationpreplant incorporatedpreemergencepostemergence
Type
Other
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , July 1980 , pp. 409 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Published with the approval of the Dir., Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville. A portion of the Ph.D. Thesis of the senior author.

References

Literature Cited

1. Baldwin, F. L. and Frans, R. E. 1972. Soybean and weed response to dinoseb and chloroxuron applied topically. Weed Sci. 20:511–514.Google Scholar
2. Chandler, J. M. 1976. Broadleaf weed control with combinations of MBR-12325 and selected herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:146.Google Scholar
3. Crowley, H. R., Teem, D. H., Buchanan, G. A., and Hoveland, C. S. 1979. Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Cassia spp. to preemergence applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:531–535.Google Scholar
4. Eastman, D. G. and Coble, H. D. 1977. Differences in the control of five morningglory species by selected soybean herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:39–45.Google Scholar
5. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. State of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11:929–931.Google Scholar
6. Frans, R. E., McClelland, M. R., and Sharp, T. 1979. Herbicide field evaluation trials on field crops, 1978. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Mimeo Series 266.Google Scholar
7. Harrison, H. F. Jr., Gossett, B. J., and Musen, H. L. 1976. Response of soybeans and weeds to MBR-12325 alone and with bentazon and chloroxuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29: 103.Google Scholar
8. Mathis, W. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1975. Effects of bentazon on different weed species at various stages of growth. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:35.Google Scholar
9. Mathis, W. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1977. Control of six annual morningglory species in Arkansas soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:38.Google Scholar
10. Mathis, W. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1977. Control of morningglory the number one weed problem in soybeans. Ark. Farm Res. 26(5):11.Google Scholar
11. Mathis, W. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1978. Control of six morningglory (Ipomoea) species in soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Abstr., p. 26.Google Scholar
12. McClelland, M. R., Oliver, L. R., Mathis, W. D., and Frans, R. E. 1978. Responses of six morningglory (Ipomoea) species to bentazon. Weed Sci. 26:459–464.Google Scholar
13. Murray, D. S. and Crowley, R. H. 1977. Relationship of weed size and susceptibility to postemergence applied herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr., p. 25.Google Scholar
14. Teem, D. H., Crowley, R. H., Buchanan, G. A., and Hoveland, C. S. 1977. Response of six Ipomoea spp. and two Cassia spp. to post-emergence applied herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:136.Google Scholar
15. Younce, H. D. and Palmer, J. H. 1976. Systems of control for sicklepod and morningglory in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:105.Google Scholar