Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:01:43.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition Between Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and Japanese Millet (Echinochloa crus-galli var. frumentacea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. J. Thullen  and
P. E. Keeley
R. J. Thullen
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric, Shafter, CA 93263
P. E. Keeley
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric, Shafter, CA 93263
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field plots, Japanese millet [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. var. frumentacea (Link) W. F. Wight] competed strongly with yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.), reducing its dry weight and the number of plants and tubers with no loss of dry weight to the millet. Because Japanese millet did not shade the nutsedge for more than half the day, the main competition was thought to be ‘root’ competition (nutrient and water) with light competition as a minor factor. The greenhouse studies verified that roots were the primary area of competition. However, light competition between the two species was stronger in the greenhouse than in field plots. Also, when confined to limited light and soil volumes with a 1-month growing period, Japanese millet was reduced in dry weight by nutsedge competition.

Keywords

Root competitionlight competition
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 24 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Black, C. C., Chen, T. M., and Brown, R. H. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17:338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Blackman, G. E. and Templeman, W. G. 1938. The nature of competition between cereal crops and annual weeds. J. Agric. Sci. 28.247–271.Google Scholar
3. Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1975. Effect of early competition on growth of common milkweed. Weed Sci. 23:1–3.Google Scholar
4. Holm, L. G., Pluchnett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The world's worst weeds, distribution and biology. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii. 609 pp.Google Scholar
5. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1978. Light requirements of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and light interception by crops. Weed Sci. 26:10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. King, L. J. 1966. Weeds of the world, biology and control. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York. 526 pp.Google Scholar
7. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.Google Scholar
8. Muzik, T. J. 1970. Weed biology and control. McGraw-Hill Co., New York. 273 pp.Google Scholar
9. Schreiber, M. M. 1967. A technique for studying weed competition in forage legume establishment. Weeds 15:1–4.Google Scholar
10. Williams, E. D. 1973. A comparison of the growth and competition behavior of seedlings and plants from rhizomes of Agropyron repens (L.) Beau v. and Agrostis gigantea Roth. Weed Res. 13: 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar