Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:21:06.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chlorimuron and Imazaquin Persistence in Selected Southern Soils under Controlled Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jill Schroeder
Jill Schroeder*
Affiliation:
Dept. Entomol., Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growth chamber research was conducted to compare the persistence of chlorimuron or imazaquin in soils from 11 locations in the southern United States at 25 C. Chlorimuron at 30 ng g-1 or imazaquin at 60 ng g-1 of soil was incorporated throughout each soil, and soils were watered to the water holding capacity and incubated in the dark. Soil samples were taken 0, 7, 14, 28, 60, and 90 d after treatment. Amount of chlorimuron or imazaquin remaining in each soil was quantified by sicklepod or corn root length bioassay, respectively. First order regression generally fit the concentration data for each herbicide. Bioactivity and persistence of chlorimuron in the soils was related primarily to soil organic matter content. Bioactivity and persistence of imazaquin was similar among the soils.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic addimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3369A.’Bioassaydegradation
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 635 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.Google Scholar
2. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., Schlueter, D. D. 1987. Sulfonylurea herbicides. Pages 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D. eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action, Vol 3. Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
3. Brown, H. M. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29:263–281.Google Scholar
4. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815–819.Google Scholar
5. Che, M., Loux, M. M., Traina, S. J., and Logan, T. J. 1992. Effect of pH on sorption and desorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on clays and humic acid. J. Environ. Qual. 21:698–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fuesler, T. P. and Hanafey, M. K. 1990. Effect of moisture on chlorimuron degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 38:256–261.Google Scholar
7. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.Google Scholar
8. Goetz, A. J., Walker, R. H., Wehbe, G., and Hajek, B.F. 1989. Sorption and mobility of chlorimuron in Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 37:428–433.Google Scholar
9. Hay, J. V. 1990. Chemistry of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29:247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Humburg, N. E. (ed). 1989. Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America, 6th ed. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL. 301 pp.Google Scholar
11. Jackson, M. N. and Banks, P. A. 1986. Effect of soil pH on the behavior of chlorimuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:421.Google Scholar
12. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.Google Scholar
13. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed Sci. 37:712–718.Google Scholar
14. Loux, M. M. and Reese, K. D. 1992. Effect of soil pH on adsorption and persistence of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 40:490–496.Google Scholar
15. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Rotational crop response to chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the previous year. Weed Sci. 39:629–633.Google Scholar
16. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1993. Effect of straw, ash, and tillage on dissipation of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 41:133–137.Google Scholar
17. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:78–83.Google Scholar
18. Stotzky, G. 1974. Activity, ecology, and population dynamics of microorganisms in soil. Pages 57–135 in Laskin, A. I. and Lechevalier, H. eds. Microbial Ecology. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
19. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–73.Google Scholar
20. Vencill, W. K. and Banks, P. A. 1994. Dissipation of chlorimuron in southeastern soils. Weed Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
21. Vencill, W. K. and Banks, P. A. 1994. Dissipation of imazaquin in southeastern soils. (personal communication) Google Scholar
22. Wolt, J. D., Rhodes, G. N., Graveel, J. G., Glosauer, E. M., Amin, M. K., and Church, P. L. 1989. Activity of imazaquin in soil solution as affected by incorporated wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw. Weed Sci. 37:254–258.Google Scholar