Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:31:53.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of cross-resistance patterns in acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor resistant wild oat (Avena fatua)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Luc Bourgeois*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Division, Bayer Inc., 77 Belfield Road, Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada M9W 1G6
Norm C. Kenkel
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
Ian N. Morrison
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Alberta, 4-10 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2P5

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine cross-resistance patterns among wild oat lines resistant to acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors and to determine which, if any, cross-resistant type was more common than another. Discriminatory concentrations of two aryloxyphenoxy-propionates (APP) and three cyclohexanediones (CHD) were determined using a petri-dish bioassay. These concentrations were then applied to 82 resistant wild oat lines identified in previous studies. In addition, two resistant standards (UM1 and UM33) and a susceptible standard (UM5) were included in the experiments. Coleoptile lengths expressed as percentages of untreated controls were used to assess the level of resistance to each herbicide. Large variations were observed among wild oat lines and herbicides. However, cluster analysis summarized the relationship between the five herbicides (variables) and the wild oat lines into three main cross-resistance types. Type A included wild oat lines with high resistance to APP herbicides and no or low resistance to CHD herbicides. Types B and C included those with low to moderate resistant and high levels of resistance to all five herbicides, respectively. Type C was the most common cross-resistance type. Relationships among herbicides were determined using pairwise correlation and principal component analysis (PCA). All correlations were high between APP herbicides and between CHD herbicides but not between APP and CHD herbicides. The first two axes of the PCA accounted for 88.4% of the total variance, with the first axis correlated to the CHD herbicides and the second axis correlated to the APP herbicides. In the PCA, wild oat lines were segregated into the three types identified in the cluster analysis. Although CHD and APP herbicides bind at the same region on the ACCase, resistant wild oat lines respond differently to them.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Betts, K. J., Ehlke, N. J., Wise, D. L., Gronwald, J. W., and Somers, D. A. 1992. Mechanism of inheritance of diclofop resistance in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 40: 184189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L. and Morrison, I. N. 1997a. Mapping risk areas for resistance to ACCase inhibitor herbicides in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77: 173179.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. and Morrison, I. N. 1997b. A survey of ACCase inhibitor resistant wild oat in a high risk township in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L., Morrison, I. N., and Kelner, D. 1997. Field and producer survey of ACCase resistant wild oat in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. In press.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1994. Resistance to acetyl Coenzyme A carboxylase inhibiting herbicides. Pages 141169 in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J. A. M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Gronwald, J. W., Eberlein, C. V., Betts, K. J., Baerg, R. J., Ehlke, N. J., and Wyse, D. L. 1992. Mechanism of diclofop resistance in an Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) biotype. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 44: 126139.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. and Morrison, I. N. 1996. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in green foxtail. Weed Sci. 44: 2530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. M., Murray, B. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Morrison, I. N. 1993. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 41: 232238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jana, S. and Naylor, J. M. 1982. Adaptation for herbicide tolerance in populations of Avena fatua . Can. J. Bot. 60: 16111617.Google Scholar
Koutsoyiannis, A. 1977. Theory of Econometrics. 2nd ed. London, U.K.: MacMillan Education Ltd, London, U. K., pp. 8191.Google Scholar
Leach, G. E., Devine, M. D., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1995. Target enzyme-based resistance to acetyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors in Eleusine indica . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 51: 129136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maneechote, C., Holtum, J. A. M., Preston, C., and Powles, S. B. 1994. Resistant acetyl-coA carboxylase is a mechanism of herbicide resistance in a biotype of Avena sterilis spp. ludoviciana . Plant Cell Physiol. 35: 627635.Google Scholar
Mansooji, A. M., Holtum, J. A., Boutsalis, P., Matthews, J. M., and Powles, S. B. 1992. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in two wild oat species (Avena fatua and Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana). Weed Sci. 40: 599605.Google Scholar
Maries, M. A. S., Devine, M. D., and Hall, J. C. 1993. Herbicide resistance in Setaria viridis conferred by a less sensitive form of acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 46: 714.Google Scholar
Marshall, G., Kirkwood, R. C., and Leach, G. E. 1994. Comparative studies on graminicide-resistant and susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica . Weed Res. 34: 177185.Google Scholar
Mazur, B. J. and Falco, S. C. 1989. The development of herbicide resistant crops. Ann. Rev. Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 441470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, S. R. 1990. Herbicide cross-resistance in slender foxtail (Alopecurus myosuroides). Weed Sci. 38: 492496.Google Scholar
Murray, B. G., Friesen, L. F., Beaulieu, K. J., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. A seed bioassay to identify acetyl-coA carboxylase inhibitor resistance in wild oat (Avena fatua) populations. Weed Technol. 10: 8589.Google Scholar
Murray, B. G., Morrison, I. N., and Brûlé-Babel, A. L. 1995. Inheritance of acetyl-coA carboxylase inhibitor resistance in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 43: 233238.Google Scholar
Newhouse, K., Singh, B., Shaner, D., and Stidham, M. 1991. Mutations in corn (Zea mays L.) conferring resistance to imidazolinone herbicides. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 6570.Google Scholar
Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics. A methodological guide to the SYN-TAX 5. 0 package. The Hague: SPB Academic.Google Scholar
Rendina, A. R., Beaudoin, J. D., Craig-Kennard, A. C., and Breen, M. K. 1989. Kinetics of inhibition of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase by the aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione graminicides. Pages 163172 in Proceedings of the 1989 Brighton Crop Protection Conference. Surrey, UK: BCPC.Google Scholar
(SAS) Statistical Analysis Systems. 1985. Version 5. SAS User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37: 350352.Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, D. E. and Wiederholt, R. J. 1995. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides. Weed Sci. 43: 527535.Google Scholar
Wiederholt, R. J. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1995. Cross-resistance of a large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) accession to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides. Weed Technol. 9: 518524.Google Scholar