Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:03:03.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biorational approaches to managing Datura stramonium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jianhua Zhang ,
Maria L. Salas ,
Nicholas R. Jordan  and
Stephen C. Weller
Maria L. Salas
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1165
Nicholas R. Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Stephen C. Weller
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1165
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted from 1995 to 1997 to test approaches to managing atrazine-resistant Datura stramonium. Eight weed management programs in a Zea mays and Glycine max rotation were evaluated for their effects on the dynamics of atrazine-resistant and -susceptible D. stramonium populations. Overall D. stramonium density and relative abundance of resistant (R) biotypes were greatly reduced in no-till Secale cereale L. (rye) cover crop management programs without triazine compared to conventional-tillage systems with the application of triazine herbicides. The negative effects of no-till on D. stramonium were greater under a G. max–Z. mays—G. max (SCS) rotation than under a Z. mays–G. max—Z. mays (CSC) rotation. A cropping system involving more G. max phases under no-till reduced both the resistant and susceptible D. stramonium populations. Results from this study support the use of soil management, crop rotation, and negative cross-resistant herbicides to manage atrazine-resistant biotypes.

Keywords

AtrazinebentazonmetribuzinpyridateDatura stramonium L. DATST, jimsonweedGlycine max (L.) Merr., soybean, ‘Edison'Zea mays L., corn, ‘Pioneer 3489.'Herbicide resistanceintegrated weed managementpopulation dynamicsseed productionconservation tillagerow widthcorn–soybean rotationcultural weed controlDATST
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , December 1999 , pp. 750 - 756
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Birschbach, E. D., Myers, M. G., and Harvey, R. G. 1993. Triazine resistant smooth pigweed control in field corn. Weed Technol. 7:431–436.Google Scholar
Clements, D. R., Benoit, D. L., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1996. Tillage effects on weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Sci. 44:314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esqueda, V. A. and Weller, S. C. 1993. Responses of jimsonweed (Datura stramonium L.) biotypes to photosynthesis inhibiting herbicides. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:119.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. 1991. Why get resistance? Can it be prevented? Pages 1–26 in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1990a. Modeling the effectiveness of herbicide rotation and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol. 4:186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1990b. Negative cross resistance; a possible key to atrazine resistance management: a call for whole plant data. Z. Naturforsch. 45c:470–473.Google Scholar
Henry, W. T. and Bauman, T. T. 1991. Interference between soybean (Glycine max) and jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) in Indiana. Weed Technol. 5:759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, J. S. 1996. Ecological fitness of herbicide-resistant weeds. Pages 387–392 in Brown, H. and Streibig, J. C., eds. Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress. Flakkebjerg, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology.Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Brule-Babel, A. L., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci. 44:176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N., Kelrick, M., Brooks, J., and Kinerk, W. 1999. Biorational management tactics to select against triazine-resistant Amaranthus hybridus: a field trial. J. Appl. Ecol. 36:123–132.Google Scholar
Jordan, T. N. and Weller, S. C. 1991. Triazine-resistant jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) problems in corn production in Indiana. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:64.Google Scholar
Kemp, M. S. and Caseley, J. C. 1987. Herbicide resistance in Alopecurus myosuroides . Pages 376–393 in Green, M. B., LeBaron, H. M., and Moberg, W. K., eds. Managing Resistance to Agrochemicals: From Fundamental Research to Practical Strategies. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
LeBaron, H. M. 1991. Distribution and seriousness of herbicide resistant weed infestations worldwide. Pages 27–44 in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Morrison, I. N. and Friesen, L. F. 1996. Herbicide resistant weeds: mutation, selection, misconception. Proc. Second Int. Weed Control Congr. 2:377–385.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B. and Matthews, J. M. 1992. Multiple herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). A driving force for the adaptation of integrated weed management. Pages 75–87 in Denholm, I., Devonshire, A., and Holloman, D., eds. Achievements and Developments in Combating Pest Resistance. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Maxwell, B. D., and Roush, M. L. 1991. Managing herbicide resistance through fitness and gene flow. Pages 129–143 in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Regnier, E. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1989. The effects of soybean (Glycine max) interference on the canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 37:187–195.Google Scholar
van Oorschot, J.L.P. 1991. Chloroplastic resistance of weeds to triazines in Europe. Pages 87–102 in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. 1991. Herbicide resistance in weedy plants: physiology and population biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22:95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Martin, A. R., and Mahnken, G. W. 1993. Control of atrazine resistant kochia in conservation tillage corn. Weed Sci. 41:225–231.Google Scholar
Williams, M. M., Jordan, N., and Yerkes, C. 1995. The fitness cost of atrazine resistance in jimsonweed (Datura stramonium L.). Am. Midl. Nat. 133:131–137.Google Scholar
Yerkes, C. N., Nourizadeh, S. D., and Weller, S. C. 1993. Characterization of atrazine resistance in a biotype of jimsonweed (Datura stramonium L.). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:19.Google Scholar
Yerkes, C. N. and Weller, S. C. 1992. Growth and reproductive characteristics of an atrazine resistant biotype of jimsonweed [Datura stramonium (L.)]. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:12.Google Scholar