Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:49:01.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atrazine Dissipation as Affected by Surface pH and Tillage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. J. Kells
Affiliation:
Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, K Y 40546
C. E. Rieck
Affiliation:
Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, K Y 40546
R. L. Blevins
Affiliation:
Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, K Y 40546
W. M. Muir
Affiliation:
Statistics Dep., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546

Abstract

Field studies and laboratory analyses were conducted to examine factors affecting degradation of 14C-atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamine)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] under field conditions. The effects of these factors on weed control under no-tillage and conventional tillage systems were also examined. The amount of radioactivity which was unextractable in 90% methanol increased with time following treatment with 14C-atrazine. The rate of formation of unextractable 14C compounds was greater under no-tillage and increased with decreasing pH. After 14 to 18 days, a greater amount of extractable atrazine was present in areas receiving lime. The degradation of atrazine occurred more rapidly when surface pH was less than 5.0 compared with a pH greater than 6.5. The effect of lime on the amount of parent atrazine present in the soil was directly correlated to its effect on soil pH. Extractable atrazine in the soil 45 days after treatment was significantly correlated with weed control with the greatest effect under no-tillage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Armstrong, D. E., Chesters, C., and Harris, R. F. 1967. Atrazine hydrolysis in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Best, J. A. and Weber, J. B. 1974. Disappearance of s-triazines as affected by soil pH using a balance-sheet approach. Weed Sci. 22:364373.Google Scholar
3. Best, J. A., Weber, J. B., and Monaco, T. J. 1975. Influence of soil pH on s-triazine availability to plants. Weed Sci. 23. 378382.Google Scholar
4. Blevins, R. L., Cook, D., Phillips, S. H., and Phillips, R. E. 1971. Influence of no-tillage on soil moisture. Agron. J. 63:593596.Google Scholar
5. Blevins, R. L., Thomas, G. W., and Cornelius, P. L. 1977. Influence of no-tillage and nitrogen fertilization on certain soil properties after five years of continuous corn. Agron. J. 69:383386.Google Scholar
6. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1966. Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York. 407 pp.Google Scholar
7. Moschler, W. W., Martens, D. C., Rich, C. I., and Shear, G. M. 1973. Comparative lime effects on continuous no-tillage and conventional tilled corn. Agron. J. 65:781783.Google Scholar
8. Nearpass, D. C. 1965. Effects of soil acidity on the adsorption, penetration, and persistence of simazine. Weeds 13:341346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Schnappinger, M. G., Trapp, C. P., Boyd, J. M., and Pruss, S. W. 1977. Soil pH and triazine activity in no-tillage corn as affected by nitrogen and lime applications. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 13:116.Google Scholar
10. Skipper, H. D., Eilmone, C. M., and Furtick, W. R. 1967. Microbial vs. chemical degradation of atrazine in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:653656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Slack, C. H., Blevins, R. L., and Rieck, C. E. 1978. Effect of soil pH and tilage on persistence of simazine. Weed Sci. 26:145148.Google Scholar
12. Wang, C. H. and Willis, D. L. 1965. Radiotracer methodology in biological science. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood, New Jersey. 363 pp.Google Scholar
13. Weber, J. B. 1966. Molecular structure and pH effects on the adsorption of 13 s-triazine compounds on montmorillonite clay. Am. Mineral. 51:16571671.Google Scholar