Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:51:25.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Prometryne in Cotton and Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. C. Sikka  and
D. E. Davis
H. C. Sikka
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
D. E. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-labeled 2,4-bis (isopropylamino)-6-methylmercapto-s-triazine (prometryne) from solution cultures by cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L., var. DPL smoothleaf) and soybean (Glycine max Merr., var. Lee) were investigated. Cotton (moderately tolerant) and soybean (sensitive) absorbed essentially equal amounts of prometryne. Whereas 14C was uniformly distributed in soybean, it was concentrated in the lysigenous glands and in the root primordia of cotton. Soybean had a considerably higher concentration of radioactivity in shoots than in roots, whereas the reverse was true in cotton. The major methanol extractable 14C-labeled component in the roots and shoots of both species was prometryne. Both species converted some prometryne to the derivative, 2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-hydroxy-s-triazine (hereinafter referred to as hydroxypropazine), but cotton shoots had a slightly higher percentage of the latter than the soybean shoots. The concentration of prometryne in soybean shoots was about four times greater than in cotton shoots. Differential translocation of prometryne appeared to be a major factor contributing to the difference in susceptibility between cotton and soybean.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 474 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Castelfranco, P., Foy, C. L., and Deutsch, D. B. 1961. Nonenzymatic detoxification of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) by extracts of Zea mays . Weeds 9:580–591.Google Scholar
2. Davis, D. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Sansing, N. G. 1959. Absorption and translocation of 14C-labeled simazine by corn, cotton, and cucumber. Weeds 7:300–309.Google Scholar
3. Davis, D. E., Gramlich, J. V., and Funderburk, H. H. Jr. 1965. Atrazine absorption and degradation by corn, cotton, and soybeans. Weeds 13:252–255.Google Scholar
4. Foy, C. L. 1964. Volatility and tracer studies with alkylamino-s-triazines. Weeds 12:103–108.Google Scholar
5. Funderburk, H. H. and Davis, D. E. 1963. The metabolism of 14C-chain and ring-labeled simazine by corn and the effect of atrazine on plant respiration systems. Weeds 11:101–104.Google Scholar
6. Gysin, H. and Knusli, E. 1960. Chemistry and herbicidal properties of triazine derivatives, p. 289–385. In Metcalf, R. L. (ed.) Advances in Pest Control Research. Vol. III. Interscience Publisher, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
7. Hamilton, R. H. 1964. Tolerance of several grass species to 2-chloro-s-triazine herbicides in relation to degradation and content of benzoxazinone derivatives. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:14–17.Google Scholar
8. Hamilton, R. H. and Moreland, D. E. 1962. Simazine: Degradation by corn seedlings. Science 135:373–374.Google Scholar
9. Hamilton, R. H. and Moreland, D. E. 1963. Fate of ipazine in cotton plants. Weeds 11:213–217.Google Scholar
10. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 347. p. 32.Google Scholar
11. Montgomery, M. and Freed, V. H. 1961. The uptake, translocation and metabolism of simazine and atrazine by corn plants. Weeds 9:231–237.Google Scholar
12. Montgomery, M. and Freed, V. H. 1964. Metabolism of triazine herbicides by plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:11–14.Google Scholar
13. Muller, P. W. and Payot, P. H. 1966. Fate of 14C-labeled triazine herbicides in plants, p. 61–70. In Isotopes in Weed Research. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
14. Negi, N. S., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Davis, D. E. 1964. Metabolism of atrazine by susceptible and resistant species. Weeds 12:53–57.Google Scholar
15. Whitenberg, D. C. 1965. Fate of prometryne in cotton plants. Weeds 13:68–71.Google Scholar
16. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A. S. 1958. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using 14C-labeled compounds. Hilgardia 28:161–191.Google Scholar