Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:49:10.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, Translocation, and Degradation of Tebuthiuron and Hexazinone in Woody Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Wayne K. McNeil ,
Jimmy F. Stritzke  and
Eddie Basler
Wayne K. McNeil
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Jimmy F. Stritzke
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Eddie Basler
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seedlings of winged elm (Ulmus data Michx.), bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa Michx.), black walnut (Juglans nigra L.), eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were treated in nutrient solution with ring-labeled 14C-tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea} or 14C-hexazinone [3-cyclohexyl-6-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione]. Four hours later, 14C was detected in all sections of winged elm treated with 14C-tebuthiuron and 14C-hexazinone. Root absorption of the tebuthiuron label by the other species occurred in the order: loblolly pine > bur oak > black walnut = eastern redcedar. The sequence of 14C-hexazinone absorption was: loblolly pine > black walnut ≥ bur oak = eastern redcedar. Foliar accumulation of the tebuthiuron label occurred in the order: bur oak > loblolly pine > eastern redcedar = black walnut, whereas the sequence with hexazinone was loblolly pine > bur oak > black walnut = eastern redcedar. The presence of the three metabolites of hexazinone in loblolly pine suggests that it may be resistant to hexazinone as a result of its ability to degrade hexazinone rather than its ability to limit uptake.

Keywords

MetabolismJuglans nigraJuniperus virginianaPinus taedaQuercus macrocarpaUlmus alata
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , November 1984 , pp. 739 - 743
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Eaton, B. J., Magnussen, J. D., and Rainey, D. P. 1976. Metabolism of tebuthiuron in soil and plants. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 83.Google Scholar
2. Fitzgerald, C. H. and Fortson, J. C. 1979. Herbaceous weed control with hexazinone in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations. Weed Sci. 27:583–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Gonzalez, F. E. 1980. The development of Velpar “Gridball” brush killer-hexazinone-pellets for forestry. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:132–138.Google Scholar
4. Haderlie, L. C. 1980. Absorption and translocation of buthidazole. Weed Sci. 28:352–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1980. Site of uptake and translocation of buthidazole in corn (Zea mays) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 28:285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-buthidazole in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 28:635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hatzios, K. K., Penner, D., and Bell, D. 1980. Inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport in isolated spinach chloroplasts by two 1,3,4-thiadiazolyl derivatives. Plant Physiol. 65:319–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lee, I. N. and Ishizuka, K. 1976. A mode of selective action of thiadiazolyl urea herbicides. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 4:155–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Loh, A., West, S. D., and Macy, T. D. 1978. Gas chromatographic analysis of tebuthiuron and its metabolites in grass, sugarcane, and sugarcane by-products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:410–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Lund-Hoie, K. 1969. Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of simazine in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Weed Res. 9:142–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Martin, R. D. and Morton, H. L. 1981. Tebuthiuron absorption, translocation, and metabolism by rangeland plants. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 7.Google Scholar
12. Peevy, F. A. 1975. Soil-applied herbicide for upland hardwoods. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:223–226.Google Scholar
13. Reiser, R. W., Belasco, I. J., and Rhodes, R. C. 1983. Identification of metabolites of hexazinone by mass spectrometry. Bio-med. Mass Spectrom. 10:581–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Riggleman, J. D. 1978. Basic properties of “Velpar” weed killer and its selective use in sugar cane. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:141–147.Google Scholar
15. Sargent, J. A. 1976. Relationship of selectivity to uptake and movement. Pages 303–312 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Ecology, Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
16. Shimabukuro, R. H. 1967. Atrazine metabolism and herbicidal selectivity. Plant Physiol. 42:1269–1276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Shone, M.G.T. and Wood, A. V. 1972. Factors responsible for the tolerance of blackcurrants to simazine. Weed Res. 12:337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sikka, H. and Davis, D. E. 1968. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of prometryne in cotton and soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:474–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Smith, J. W. and Sheets, T. J. 1967. Uptake, distribution, and metabolism of monuron and diuron in several plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15:577–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. South, D., Crowley, R. H., and Gjerstad, D. H. 1976. Recent herbicide weed control results in pine seedbeds. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:300–308.Google Scholar
21. Steinert, W. G. and Stritzke, J. F. 1977. Uptake and phytotoxicity of tebuthiuron. Weed Sci. 25:390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Thompson, L. Jr. 1972. Metabolism of chloro-s-triazine herbicides by Panicum and Setaria . Weed Sci. 20:585–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar