Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:14:06.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption and translocation of glyphosate isopropylamine and trimethylsulfonium salts in Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Norbert M. Satchivi
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Donald P. Briskin
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Growth chamber and laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate foliar absorption and translocation of the isopropylamine (Ipa) or trimethylsulfonium (Tms) salts of glyphosate in Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi. Glyphosate was applied at 250 g ai ha−1. Absorption of 14C-glyphosate in both formulations increased similarly in both species over 72 h. Seventy-two hours after treatment (HAT), A. theophrasti absorbed 26% of applied 14C of both formulations, whereas S. faberi absorbed 43% of both formulations. The addition of 1% ammonium sulfate (AMS) to both formulations increased the amount of herbicide absorbed to 35% in A. theophrasti and 60% in S. faberi 72 HAT. Translocation of absorbed 14C-glyphosate in both formulations (with or without AMS) was greater for S. faberi than A. theophrasti 72 HAT. For A. theophrasti, 17% of 14C absorbed in Ipa and Tms formulations were translocated out of the treated leaf, whereas additions of AMS increased the amount translocated to 25 and 23% for Ipa and Tms, respectively. The largest portion of translocated 14C moved to tissues above the treated leaf. For S. faberi, 37% of absorbed 14C in both Ipa and Tms formulations were translocated out of the treated leaf 72 HAT, whereas 42% translocated when 1% AMS was added to both formulations. In S. faberi, the largest portion of 14C-glyphosate translocated to tissues below the treated leaf. In summary, no differences were found between Ipa and Tms formulations in both weed species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Ahmadi, M. S., Haderlie, L. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Effect of growth stage and water stress on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control and on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 28:277282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrhein, N., Deus, B., Gehrke, P., and Steinrücken, H. C. 1980. The site of the inhibition of the shikimate pathway by glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 66:830834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnaud, L., Nurit, F., Ravanel, P., and Tissut, M. 1994. Distribution of glyphosate and its target enzyme inside wheat plants. Pestic. Sci. 40:217223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buesinger, M. L. and Hart, S. E. 1998. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate and glyphosate in broadleaf weed species. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:95.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci. 31:124130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caseley, J. C. and Coupland, D. 1985. Environmental and plant factors affecting glyphosate uptake, movement and activity. Pages 92124 in Google Scholar
Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Claus, J. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, H. and Meinen, E. 1998. Influence of water stress and surfactant on the efficacy, absorption, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 46:289296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, M. L. and Delrot, S. 1993. Carrier-mediated uptake of glyphosate in broad bean (Vicia faba) via a phosphate transporter. Physiol. Plant. 87:568575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, S. A. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. A comparison between glyphosate and assimilate translocation patterns in tall morningglory (Ipomoea purpurea). Weed Sci. 31:308314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, P. C., Ryerse, J. S., and Sammons, R. D. 1998. Correlation of leaf damage with uptake and translocation of glyphosate in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Technol. 12:300307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. 1985. The Herbicide Glyphosate. London: Butterworth, pp. 4874.Google Scholar
Holloway, P. J. 1970. Surface factors affecting the wetting of leaves. Pestic. Sci. 1:156163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T. N. 1981. Effects of diluent volumes and surfactant on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 29:7983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G., Krauz, R. F., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Soybean tolerance and summer annual weed control with glufosinate and glyphosate in resistant soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:120.Google Scholar
Krauz, R. F. and Kapusta, G. 1994. Annual weed control with glyphosate at several rates, weed sizes and spray volumes. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:120121.Google Scholar
Laerke, P. E. and Streibig, J. C. 1995. Foliar absorption of some glyphosate formulations and their efficacy on plants. Pestic. Sci. 44:107116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybeans (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. A. and Edgington, L. V. 1981. Comparative systemic translocation of several xenobiotics and sucrose. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 16:8796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Azlin, W. R. 1978. Effects of environment on the toxicity of glyphosate to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 26:605608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Taylor, S. E., and Gander, J. R. 1996. Influence of application timing and rate of glyphosate on weed control in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:51.Google Scholar
Riechers, D. E., Wax, L. M., Liebl, R. A., and Bullock, D. G. 1995. Surfactant effects on glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technol. 9:281285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riechers, D. E., Wax, L. M., Liebl, R. A., and Bush, D. R. 1994. Surfactant-increased glyphosate uptake into plasma membrane vesicles isolated from common lambsquaters leaves. Plant Physiol. 105:14191425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Røyneberg, T., Balke, N. E., and Lund-Høie, K. 1992. Effects of adjuvants and temperature on glyphosate absorption by cultured cells of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.). Weed Res. 32:419428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. L., Gaines, C. G., and Jensen, R. A. 1982. Enzymological basis for the herbicidal action of glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 70:833839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salisbury, C. D., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1991. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of glyphosate and SC-0224 control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 5:1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandburg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-glyphosate in several weed species. Weed Res. 20:195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherrick, S. L., Holt, H. A., and Hess, F. D. 1986. Effects of adjuvants and environment during plant development on glyphosate absorption and translocation in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 34:811816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprankle, P., Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1978. Separation of glyphosate and possible metabolites by thin-layer chromatography. Weed Sci. 26:673674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate on four weed species. Weed Sci. 45:378381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldecker, M. A. and Wyse, D. L. 1985. Soil moisture effects on glyphosate absorption and translocation in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 33:299305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanamarta, G. D. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215231.Google Scholar
Westwood, J. H., Yerkes, C. N., DeGennaro, F. P., and Weller, S. C. 1997. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in tolerant and susceptible biotypes of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 45:658663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, G. D. 1978. Factors affecting toxicity and translocation of glyphosate in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 26:509513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1985. Effect of inorganic salts on the toxicity and translocation of glyphosate and MSMA in purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Sci. 33:755761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyrill, J. B. and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandstra, B. H. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1977. Movement and activity of glyphosate in purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 25:268274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar