Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:02:18.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption and translocation of florpyrauxifen-benzyl in ten aquatic plant species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2021

Erika J. Haug Open the ORCID record for Erika J. Haug [Opens in a new window] ,
Khalied A. Ahmed ,
Travis W. Gannon  and
Rob J. Richardson
Erika J. Haug*
Affiliation:
Research Scholar, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Khalied A. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Research Chemist, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Travis W. Gannon
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Rob J. Richardson
Affiliation:
Professor, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Erika J. Haug, North Carolina State University, 4401A Williams Hall, 101 Derieux Place, Raleigh, NC27695. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Additional active ingredients are needed for use in aquatic systems to respond to new threats or treatment scenarios, enhance selectivity, reduce use rates, and mitigate the risk of herbicide resistance. Florpyrauxifen-benzyl is a new synthetic auxin developed for use as an aquatic herbicide. A study was conducted at North Carolina State University in which 10 µg L−1 of 25% radiolabeled florpyrauxifen-benzyl was applied to the isolated shoot tissue of 10 different aquatic plant species to elucidate absorption and translocation patterns in these species. Extremely high levels of shoot absorption were observed for all species, and uptake was rapid. Highest shoot absorptions were observed for crested floatingheart [Nymphoides cristata (Roxb.) Kuntze] (A192 = 20 µg g−1), dioecious hydrilla [Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle] (A192 = 25.3 µg g−1), variable watermilfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum Michx.) (A192 = 40.1 µg g−1), and Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) (A192 = 25.3 µg g−1). Evidence of translocation was observed in all rooted species tested, with the greatest translocation observed in N. cristata (1.28 µg g−1 at 192 h after treatment). The results of this study add to the growing body of knowledge surrounding the behavior of this newly registered herbicide within aquatic plants.

Keywords

Egeria densaEichhornia crassipesHydrilla verticillataMyriophyllum heterophyllumMyriophyllum sibiricumMyriophyllum spicatumNymphoides cristataProcellacorSalvinia molestaVallisneria americana
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 2021 , pp. 624 - 630
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Vipan Kumar, Kansas State University

References

Beets, J, Netherland, MD (2018) Mesocosm response of crested floatingheart, hydrilla and two native emergent plants to florpyrauxifen-benzyl: a new arylpicolinate herbicide. J Aquat Plant Manage 56:57–62 Google Scholar
Bromilow, RH, Chamerlain, K, Evans, AA (1990) Physicochemical aspects of phloem translocation of herbicides. Weed Sci 38:305–314 10.1017/S0043174500056575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, AH, Reade, JPH, eds (2010) Herbicides and Plant Physiology. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Wiley. Pp 50–69, 216–237 Google Scholar
Covich, AP, Austen, MC, Bärlocher, F, Chauvet, E, Cardinale, BJ, Biles, CL, Inchausti, P, Dangles, O, Solan, M, Gessner, MO, Statzner, B, Moss, B (2004) The role of biodiversity in the functioning of freshwater and marine benthic ecosystems. BioScience 54:767–775 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0767:TROBIT]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Carvalho, RF, Bomilow, RH, Greenwood, R (2007) Uptake and translocation of non-ionized pesticides in the emergent aquatic plant parrot feather (Myriophyllum aquaticum). Pest Manag Sci 63:798–802 10.1002/ps.1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbarre, A, Muller, P, Imhoff, V, Guern, J (1996) Comparison of mechanisms controlling uptake and accumulation of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, naphthalene-1-acetic acid, and indole-3-acetic acid in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Planta 198:532–541 10.1007/BF00262639CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downing, A, Leibold, MA (2002) Ecosystem consequences of species richness and composition in pond food webs. Nature 416:837–841 10.1038/416837aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelhardt, K, Ritchie, M (2002) The effect of aquatic plant species richness on wetland ecosystem processes. Ecology 83:2911–2924 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2911:TEOAPS]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, JB, Alexander, AL, Balko, TW, Buysse, AM, Brewster, WK, Bryan, K, Daeuble, JF, Fields, CS, Gast, RE, Green, RA, Irvine, NM, Lo, WC, Lowe, CT, Rnega, JM, Richburg, JS, et al. (2016) The discovery of Arylex TM active and Rinskor TM active: two novel auxin herbicides. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 24:362–371 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.08.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangstad, EO, Cardarelli, NF (1993) The Relation between Aquatic Weeds and Public Health. Pages 85–90 in Pieterse, AH, Murphy, KJ eds. Aquatic Weeds: The Ecology and Management of Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation. New York: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Gause, GF (1934) Experimental analysis of Vito Volterra’s mathematical theory of the struggle for existence. Science 79:16–17 10.1126/science.79.2036.16.bCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Getsinger, KD, Netherland, MD, Grue, CE, Koschnick, TJ (2008) Improvements in the use of aquatic herbicides and establishment of future research directions. J Aquat Plant Manage 46:32–41 Google Scholar
Grossmann, K (2010) Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Manag Sci 66:113–120 10.1002/ps.1860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halstead, JM, Michaud, J, Hallas-Burt, S (2003) Hedonic analysis of effects of a nonnative invader (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) on New Hampshire (USA) lakefront properties. Environ Manage 32:391–398 10.1007/s00267-003-3023-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, G (1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297 10.1126/science.131.3409.1292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kniss, AR, Vassios, JD, Nissen, SJ, Ritz, C (2011) Nonlinear regression analysis of herbicide absorption studies. Weed Sci 59:601–610 10.1614/WS-D-11-00034.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, DG, Barko, JW (1987) Effects of temperature and sediment type on growth and morphology of monoecious and dioecious Hydrilla. J Freshwater Ecol 4:245–252 Google Scholar
Miller, MR, Norsworthy, JK (2015) Influence of herbicide rate, application volume and adjuvant use on efficacy of Rinskor active. B.R. Wells Arkansas Rice Research Studies 634:196–200 Google Scholar
Netherland, MD (2009) Chemical control of aquatic weeds. Pages 65–78 in Gettys, LA, Haller, WT, Bellaud, M eds. Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants. Marietta, GA: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation Google Scholar
Netherland, MD, Richardson, RJ (2016) Evaluating sensitivity of five aquatic plants to a novel arylpicolinate herbicide utilizing an organization for economic cooperation and development protocol. Weed Sci 64:181–190 10.1614/WS-D-15-00092.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitlo, RH, Dawson, FH (1993) Flow resistance of aquatic weeds. Pages 74–84 in Pieterse, AH, Murphy, KJ, eds. Aquatic Weeds: The Ecology and Management of Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation. New York: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Puri, A, MacDonald, GE, Haller, WT (2007) Stability of fluridone-resistant hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) biotypes over time. Weed Sci 55:12–15 10.1614/WS-06-150.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, RJ, Haug, EJ, Netherland, MD (2016) Response of seven aquatic plants to a new arylpicolinate herbicide. J Aquat Plant Manage 54:26–31 Google Scholar
Schultz, R, Dibble, E (2012) Effects of invasive macrophytes on freshwater fish and macroinvertebrate communities: the role of invasive plant traits. Hydrobiologia 684:1–14 10.1007/s10750-011-0978-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, DF, Anderson, LW (1986) Photoperiod responses in monoecious and dioecious Hydrilla verticillata. Weed Sci 34:551–557 Google Scholar
Sperry, BP, Leary, JK, Jones, D, Ferrell, JA (2021) Observations of a submersed field application of florpyrauxifen-benzyl suppressing hydrilla in a small lake in central Florida. J Aquat Plant Manage 59:20–26 Google Scholar
Steward, KK, Van, TK (1987) Comparative studies of monoecious and dioecious hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) biotypes. Weed Sci 35:204–210 10.1017/S0043174500079066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, DL, Van, TK, Portier, KM (1992) Growth of dioecious and monoecious hydrilla from single tubers. J. Aquat Plant Manage 30:15–20 Google Scholar
True-Meadows, SL (2013) Monoecious Hydrilla Biology and Response to Selected Herbicides. Ph.D dissertation. Raleigh: North Carolina State University. 157 pGoogle Scholar
True-Meadows, SL, Haug, EJ, Richardson, RJ (2016) Monoecious hydrilla—a review of the literature. J Aquat Plant Manage 54:1–11 Google Scholar
Vassios, JD, Nissen, SJ, Koschnick, TJ, Heilman, MA (2014) Triclopyr absorption and translocation by Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) following liquid and granular applications. Weed Sci 62:22–28 10.1614/WS-D-13-00036.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassios, JD, Nissen, SJ, Koschnick, TJ, Heilman, MA (2017) Fluridone, penoxsulam, and triclopyr absorption and translocation by Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata). J Aquat Plant Manage 55:58–64 Google Scholar
Wells, GS, Taylor, M (2016) Rinskor (TM) active—a new herbicide for rice weed control in Australia. Pages 269–271 in Proceedings of the Twentieth Australasian Weeds Conference. Perth, Western Australia: Weeds Society of Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Wilde, SB, Murphy, TM, Hope, CP, Habrun, SK, Kempton, J, Birrenkott, A, Wiley, F, Bowerman, WW, Lewitus, AJ (2005) Avian vacuolar myelinopathy linked to exotic aquatic plants and a novel cyanobacterial species. Environ Toxicol 20:348–353 10.1002/tox.20111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C, Boyle, KJ (2010) The effect of an aquatic invasive species (Eurasian watermilfoil) on lakefront property values. Ecol Econ 70:394–404 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar