Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:39:25.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absence of a Role for Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism in Differential Sensitivity of Hemp Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to Two Pyridine Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael S. Orfanedes ,
Loyd M. Wax  and
Rex A. Liebl
Michael S. Orfanedes
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana. IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
Crop Prot. Res. Unit. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Univ. Illinois, Urbana. IL 61801
Rex A. Liebl
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana. IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hemp dogbane is sensitive to fluroxypyr and tolerant to clopyralid. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of clopyralid and fluroxypyr were studied in hemp dogbane to determine if differences in these processes could be responsible for differential sensitivity. In addition, the effect of growth stage on herbicide absorption and translocation was evaluated. The 14C-herbicides were applied to the adaxial side of a single leaf located near the midpoint of hydroponically cultured plants. Uptake of fluroxypyr was more rapid than clopyralid. At 72 h after treatment (HAT), fluroxypyr and clopyralid absorption was 62 and 38%, respectively. Clopyralid was much more mobile than fluroxypyr, with 75% of the absorbed 14C from 14C-clopyralid recovered outside the treated leaf compared to only 45% for fluroxypyr 72 HAT. Relative to fluroxypyr, a higher percentage of 14C-clopyralid recovered outside the treated leaf translocated acropetally, especially when plants were treated during the vegetative stage. Treatment during the early reproductive stage increased basipetal and reduced acropetal translocation relative to the vegetative stage. Neither herbicide was metabolized rapidly. Approximately 60 and 90% of the recovered 14C was attributable to unaltered fluroxypyr and clopyralid, respectively, 72 HAT. Some differences in absorption, translocation, and metabolism between clopyralid and fluroxypyr exist, but they cannot fully account for differential sensitivity of hemp dogbane to these two herbicides. Differences in activity at the target site may be responsible for differential activity of these herbicides on hemp dogbane.

Keywords

Clopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidfluroxypyr, [(4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6(fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acidhemp dogbane, Apocynum cannabinum L. # APCCAUptaketranslocationmetabolismselectivityAPCCA
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1948. Principal noxious weeds of kansas with emphasis upon their root systems in relation to control. Agric. Exp. Sta., Kansas State Coll. of Agric. and Applied Sci., Manhattan, KS. Bull. 331. 45 pp.Google Scholar
2. Balbach, H. E. 1965. Variation and Speciation in Populations of Apocynum in North America. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
3. Becker, R. 1981. Today's weed: hemp dogbane. Pages 15–16 in Weeds Today. Winter issue. Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H., and Meyer, R. E. 1983. Absorption and translocation of triclopyr in honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 31:807–812.Google Scholar
5. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H., and Meyer, R. E. 1986. Concentration of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) stems. Weed Sci. 34:211–217.Google Scholar
6. Coble, H. D., Slife, F. W., and Butler, H. S. Absorption, metabolism. and translocation of 2,4-D by honeyvine milkweed. Weed Sci. 18:653–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Crafts, A. S. 1964. Herbicide behavior in the plant. Pages 75–110 in Audus, L. J., ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
8. Devine, M. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Devine, M. D., Bestman, H. D., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1987. Uptake and accumulation of the herbicides chlorsulfuron and clopyralid in excised pea root tissue. Plant Physiol. 85:82–86.Google Scholar
10. Devine, M. D. 1989. Phloem translocation of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:191–213.Google Scholar
11. Devine, M. D., Bestman, H. D., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1990. Physiological basis for the different phloem mobilities of chlorsulfuron and clopyralid. Weed Sci. 38:1–9.Google Scholar
12. Eames, A. J. 1950. Destruction of phloem in young bean plants after treatment with 2,4-D. Am. J. Bot. 37:840–847.Google Scholar
13. Gorrell, R. M., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1988. Translocation and fate of dicamba, picloram, and triclopyr in horsenettle, Solanum carolinense . Weed Sci. 36:447–452.Google Scholar
14. Haagsma, T. 1975. Dowco 290-A coming new selective herbicide. Down Earth 30(4): 1–2.Google Scholar
15. Hall, J. C. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1988. The absence of a role of absorption, translocation, or metabolism in the selectivity of picloram and clopyralid in two plant species. Weed Sci. 36:9–14.Google Scholar
16. Hall, J. C. and Soni, M. 1989. Antagonism of picloram by clopyralid in rapeseed plants. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 33:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Hodgson, J. M. 1974. Canada thistle, world-wide pest with many names. Pages 10–11 in Weeds Today. Winter issue.Google Scholar
18. Horak, M. J. 1990. The life history and control of bigroot morningglory (Ipomoea pandurata). Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. 88 pp.Google Scholar
19. Jacob, F. and Neumann, S. 1983. Quantitative determination of mobility of xenobiotics and criteria of their phloem and xylem mobility. Pages 357–362 in Miyamoto, J. and Kearney, P. C., eds. Pesticide Chemistry: Human Welfare and the Environment. Pergamon Press, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Kirkland, K. H. 1977. Glyphosate for the control of Canada thistle on summer fallow. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:1015–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Kleier, D. A. 1988. Phloem mobility of xenobiotics I. Mathematical model unifying the weak acid hypothesis and intermediate permeability theories. Plant Physiol. 86:803–810.Google Scholar
22. Lewer, P. and Owen, W. J. 1989. Amino acid conjugation of triclopyr by soybean cell suspension cultures. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 33:249–256.Google Scholar
23. Lym, R. G. and Moxness, K. D. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of picloram and 2,4-D in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 37:498–502.Google Scholar
24. McAllister, R. S. and Haderlie, L. C. 1985. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on root bud development and assimilate translocation in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:148–152.Google Scholar
25. Orfanedes, M. S. and Wax, L. M. 1991. Differential response of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to clopyralid, fluroxypyr, and 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 5:781–787.Google Scholar
26. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1984. Absorption and translocation of 14C-3,6-dichlorpicolinic acid in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Weed Res. 24:17–22.Google Scholar
27. Radosevich, S. R. and Bayer, D. E. 1979. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on triclopyr, picloram, and 2,4,5-T translocation. Weed Sci. 27:22–27.Google Scholar
28. Robison, L. R. and Jeffery, L. S. 1972. Hemp dogbane growth and control. Weed Sci. 20:156–159.Google Scholar
29. Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979. Distribution, competition, and phenology of hemp dogbane in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 27:565–570.Google Scholar
30. Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1980. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum). Weed Sci. 28:13–20.Google Scholar
31. Sharma, M. P., Chang, F. Y., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1971. Penetration and translocation of picloram in Canada thistle. Weed Sci. 19:349–355.Google Scholar
32. Sharma, M. P. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1973. Fate of picloram in Canada thistle, soybean, and barley. Weed Sci. 21:350–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Shober, A. E., McMaster, S. A., and Gantz, R. L. 1986. Fluroxypyr: a new environmentally compatible herbicide. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 39:167–168.Google Scholar
34. Turnbull, G. C. and Stephenson, G. R. 1985. Translocation of clopyralid and 2,4-D in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:143–147.Google Scholar
35. Waldecker, M. A. and Wyse, D. L. 1985. Chemical and physical effects of the accumulation of glyphosate in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) root buds. Weed Sci. 33:605–611.Google Scholar
36. Wyrill, J. B. and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557–566.Google Scholar
37. Yamaguchi, S. 1965. Analysis of 2,4-D transport. Hilgardia 36:349–378.Google Scholar