Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T22:46:13.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A whiter shade of pale, a blacker shade of dark: Parameters of spatially induced blackness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2006

DAVID L. BIMLER
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Human Development, Massey University, New Zealand
GALINA V. PARAMEI
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Darmstadt University of Technology, Germany
CHINGIS A. IZMAILOV
Affiliation:
Department of Psychophysiology, Moscow Lomonosov State University, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The surface-mode property of “blackness” is induced by simultaneous contrast with an adjacent, more luminant surround. As numerous studies have shown, the degree of blackness induced within an achromatic test field is a function of the relative luminance of the adjacent chromatic inducing field, but not of its hue. But in the converse case of chromatic test fields, susceptibility to blackening has been reported to vary with wavelength. The present study investigates this possibility, that some wavelengths are more susceptible. We also questioned whether “white” and “black” sensory components function as opposites in blackness appearance. We recorded the appearance of a central monochromatic test field of constant luminance (10 cd/m2), with wavelength ranging across the visible spectrum, while a broadband white annulus was set to six luminance levels ranging across three log steps. Three color-normal observers followed a color-naming technique. All six opponent-hue names and their combinations were response options; blackness and whiteness in the test field could therefore be reported independently. Of primary interest were the achromatic responses. When represented within a multidimensional space, these revealed the “white-to-black” dimension but in addition a quality (dimension) of “desaturation.” Compared against chromatic properties of the test field, the results provide evidence that blackness is a function of inducing field brightness (not luminance). This result is in accord with observations made by Shinomori et al. (1997) using a different procedure. We conclude that blackness induction occurs at a stage of visual processing subsequent to the origin of the brightness signal from a combination of opponent-process channels.

Type
PERCEPTION
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bimler, D.L. & Paramei, G.V. (2005). Bezold-Brücke effect in normal trichromats and protanopes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 22, 21202136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicerone, C.M., Volbrecht, V., Donnelly, S.K., & Werner, J.S. (1986). Perception of blackness. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 3, 432436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R.M. (1967). Luminance and induced colors from adaptation to 100-millilambert monochromatic light. Journal of the Optical Society of America 57, 279281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R.M. & Swenholt, B.K. (1967). Chromatic strength of colors: Dominant wavelength and purity. Journal of the Optical Society of America 57, 13191324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuld, K. & Otto, T.A. (1985). Colors of monochromatic lights that vary in contrast-induced brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2, 7683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuld, K., Otto, T.A., & Slade, C.W. (1986). Spectral responsivity of the white-black channel. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 3, 11821188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. & Abramov, I. (1988). Scaling procedures for specifying color appearance. Color Research and Application 13, 146152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggelund, P. (1992). A bidimensional theory of achromatic color vision. Vision Research 32, 21072119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izmailov, C.A. (1981). [Multidimensional scaling of achromatic component of color.] In Normative and Descriptive Models of Decision Making, eds. Lomov, B.F., Luce, R.D., Estes, W.K., Krylov, V.J. & Krylova, N.V., pp. 98110. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
Izmailov, C.A. & Sokolov, E.N. (1991). Spherical model of color and brightness discrimination. Psychological Science 2, 249259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izmailov, C.A., Sokolov, E.N., & Shtiui, S. (1999). [Spherical model of color discrimination under the conditions of simultaneous color contrast]. Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya No. 4, 2136 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kulp, T.D. & Fuld, K. (1989). Black spectral responsivity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 6, 12331238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, G.E. & Thomas, J.P. (1968). Relation of spatially induced brightness changes to test and inducing wavelengths. Journal of the Optical Society of America 58, 2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P.C., Wooten, B.R., & Ludman, E.J. (1985). Achromatic color categories. Perception and Psychophysics 37, 198204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rautian, G.N. (1957). [New anomaloscope]. Biofizika 2, 734742 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Shinomori, K., Nakano, Y., & Uchikawa, K. (1994). Influence of the illuminance and spectral composition of surround fields on spatially induced blackness. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 11, 23832388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinomori, K., Schefrin, B.E., & Werner, J.S. (1997). Spectral mechanisms of spatially induced blackness: Data and quantitative model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 14, 372387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volbrecht, V., Werner, J.S., & Cicerone, C.M. (1990). Additivity of spatially induced blackness. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7, 106112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, J.S., Cicerone, C.M., Kliegl, R., & DellaRosa, D. (1984). Spectral efficiency of blackness induction. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1, 981986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar