Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:29:19.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual response properties of cortical inputs to an extrastriate cortical area in the cat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Helen Sherk
Helen Sherk
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The existence of multiple areas of extrastriate visual cortex raises the question of how the response properties of each area are derived from its visual input. This question was investigated for one such area in the cat, referred to here as the Clare-Bishop area (Hubel & Wiesel, 1969); it is the region of lateral suprasylvian cortex that receives input from area 17. A novel approach was used, in which kainic acid was injected locally into the Clare-Bishop area, making it possible to record directly from afferent inputs.

The response properties of the great majority of a sample of 424 presumed afferents resembled cells in areas 17 and 18. Thus, a systematic comparison was made with cells from area 17's upper layers, the source of its projection to the Clare-Bishop area (Gilbert & Kelly, 1975), to see whether these afferents had distinctive properties that might distinguish them from cells projecting to areas 18 or 19. Some differences did emerge: (1) The smallest receptive fields typical of area 17 were relatively scarce among afferents. (2) Direction-selective afferents were more abundant than were such cells in area 17. (3) End-stopped afferents were extremely rare, although end-stopped cells were common in area 17's upper layers.

Despite these differences, afferents were far more similar in their properties to cells in areas 17 and 18 than to cells in the Clare-Bishop area. Compared to the latter, afferents showed major discrepancies in receptive-field size, in direction selectivity, in end-stopping, and in ocular dominance distribution. These differences seem most likely to stem from circuitry intrinsic to the Clare-Bishop area.

Keywords

Visual cortexExtrastriate visual areasClare-Bishop areaArea 17 outputsKainic acid
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 249 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berson, D.M. & Graybiel, A.M. (1978). Parallel thalamic zones in the LP-pulvinar complex of the cat identified by their afferent and efferent connections. Brain Research 147, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, P.O., Coombs, J.S. & Henry, G.S. (1971). Responses to visual contours: spatio-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurons. Journal of Physiology (London) 219, 625–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, C. & Zumbroich, T.J. (1987). Stimulus selectivity and functional organization in the lateral suprasylvian visual cortex of the cat. Journal of Physiology (London) 389, 569–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullier, J., Kennedy, H. & Salinger, W. (1984). Branching and laminar origin of projections between visual cortical areas in the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 228, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camarda, R. & Rizzolatti, G. (1976). Visual receptive fields in the lateral suprasylvian area (Clare-Bishop area) of the cat. Brain Research 101, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalupa, L.M. & Fish, S.E. (1978). Response characteristics of visual and extravisual neurons in the pulvinar and lateral posterior nuclei of the cat. Experimental Neurology 61, 96–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalupa, L.M., Williams, R.W. & Hughes, M.J. (1983). Visual response properties in the tectorecipient zone of the cat's lateral posterior-pulvinar complex: a comparison with the superior collic-ulus. Journal of Neuroscience 3, 2587–2596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, M.H. & Bishop, G.H. (1954). Response from an association area secondarily activated from optic cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 17, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyle, J.T. & Schwarcz, R. (1976). Lesion of striatal neurons with kainic acid provides a model for Huntington's chorea. Nature (London) 263, 244–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoe, E.A. & Van Essen, D.C. (1985). Segregation of efferent connections and receptive-field properties in visual area V2 of the macaque. Nature 317, 58–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duysens, J., Orban, G.A., Van der Glas, H.W. & de Zegher, F.E. (1982). Functional properties of area 19 as compared to area 17 of the cat. Brain Research 231, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferster, D. (1981). A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 311, 623–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garey, L.J., Jones, E.G. & Powell, T.P.S. (1968). Interrelationships of striate and extrastriate cortex with the primary relay sites of the visual pathway. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 31, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, C.D. (1977). Laminar differences in receptive-field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 268, 391–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, C.D. & Kelly, J.P. (1975). The projections of cells in different layers of the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 163, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfraind, J.M., Meulders, M. & Veraat, C. (1969). Visual receptive fields of neurons in pulvinar, nucleus lateralis posterior, and nucleus suprageniculatus thalami of the cat. Brain Research 15, 552–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamada, T. (1987). Neural response to the motion of textures in the lateral suprasylvian area of cats. Behavioral Brain Research 25, 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, G.H., Lund, J.S. & Harvey, A.R. (1978). Cells of the striate cortex projecting to the Clare-Bishop area of the cat. Brain Research 151, 154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D.H. & Livingstone, M.S. (1987). Segregation of form, color, and stereopsis in primate area 18. Journal of Neuroscience 7, 3378–3415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 160, 106–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1965). Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 28, 229–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1969). Visual area of the lateral suprasylvian gyrus (Clare-Bishop area) of the cat. Journal of Physiology (London) 202, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, A. (1975). A quantitative analysis of the cat retinal ganglion cell topography. Journal of Comparative Neurology 163, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, A. (1981). Population magnitudes and distribution of the major modal classes of cat retinal ganglion cells as estimated from HRP filling and a systematic survey of the soma diameter spectra for classical neurones. Journal of Comparative Neurology 197, 303–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levick, W.R. (1972). Another tungsten microelectrode. Medical and Biological Engineering 10, 510–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, R. (1978). Functional organization in the cat's pulvinar complex. Experimental Brain Research 31, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, R. (1981). Differential responsiveness of cells in the visual zones of the cat's LP-pulvinar complex to visual stimuli. Experimental Brain Research 43, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConnell, S.K. & LeVay, S. (1984) Segregation of on- and off-center afferents in mink visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 81, 1590–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, I.W. & Nakane, P.K. (1974). Periodate-lysine-paraformal-dehyde fixative. A new fixative for immunoelectron microscopy. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 22, 1077–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, L.A., Rosenquist, A.C. & Tusa, R.J. (1978). The retinotopic organization of lateral suprasylvian visual areas in the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 177, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, J.D., Nikara, T. & Bishop, P.O. (1968). Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research 6, 373–390.Google ScholarPubMed
Raczkowski, D. & Rosenquist, A.C. (1981). Retinotopic organization in the cat lateral posterior-pulvinar complex. Brain Research 221, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauschecker, J.P., von Grunau, M.W. & Poulin, C. (1987). Centrifugal organization of direction preferences in the cat's lateral suprasylvian visual cortex and its relation to flow field processing. Journal of Neuroscience 7, 943–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J.H. & Deadwyler, S.A. (1981). Kainic acid produces depolarization of CA3 pyramidal cells in the in vitro hippocampal slice. Brain Research 221, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, H., Tanaka, K., Fukada, Y. & Oyamada, H. (1988). Analysis of discontinuity in visual contours in area 19 of the cat. Journal of Neuroscience 8, 1131–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherk, H. (1986). Location and connections of visual cortical areas in the cat's suprasylvian sulcus. Journal of Comparative Neurology 247, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherk, H. (1988). Retinotopic order and functional organization in a region of suprasylvian visual cortex, the Clare-Bishop area. In Progress in Brain Research Vol. 57, ed. Hicks, T.P. & Benedek, G., pp. 237–244.Google Scholar
Sherk, H. & LeVay, S. (1983). Contribution of the cortico-claustral loop to receptive-field properties in area 17 of the cat. Journal of Neuroscience 3, 2121–2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherk, H. & Ombrellaro, M. (1988). The retinotopic match between area 17 and its targets in visual suprasylvian cortex. Experimental Brain Research 72, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipp, S. & Zeki, S. (1985) Segregation of pathways leading from area VZ to areas V4 and V5 of macaque monkey visual cortex. Nature 315, 322–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spear, P.D. & Baumann, T.P. (1975). Receptive-field characteristics of single neurons in the lateral suprasylvian visual area of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 38, 1403–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, J. (1978). The number and distribution of ganglion cells in the cat's retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 180, 753–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, K., Ohzawa, I., Ramoa, A.S. & Freeman, R.D. (1987). Receptive-field properties of cells in area 19 of the cat. Experimental Brain Research 65, 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyama, K., Komatusu, Y. & Kozasa, T. (1986). The responsiveness of Clare-Bishop neurons to motion cues for motion stereopsis. Neuroscience Research 4, 83–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunau, M.W.von, Zumbroich, T.J. & Poulin, C. (1987). Visual receptive-field properties in the posterior suprasylvian cortex of the cat: a comparison between the areas PMLS and PLLS. Vision Research 27, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M.J. (1969). Visual receptive fields of cells in a cortical area remote from the striate cortex in the cat. Nature 223, 973–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahs, K.R. & Stryker, M.P. (1988). Segregation of ON and OFF afferents to ferret visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 59, 1410–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeki, S.M. (1974). Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Physiology (London) 236, 549–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zumbroich, T.J., Von Grunau, M., Poulin, C. & Blakemore, C. (1986). Differences of visual field representation in the medial and lateral banks of the suprasylvian cortex (PMLS/PLLS) of the cat. Experimental Brain Research 64, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed