Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:39:43.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of an updated HRR color vision test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2005

JAMES E. BAILEY ,
MAUREEN NEITZ ,
DIANE M. TAIT  and
JAY NEITZ
JAMES E. BAILEY
Affiliation:
Southern California College of Optometry
MAUREEN NEITZ
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin
DIANE M. TAIT
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin
JAY NEITZ
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The HRR pseudoisochromatic plate (pip) test was originally designed as a screening and diagnostic test for color vision deficiencies. The original HRR test is now long out of print. We evaluate here the new 4th edition of the HRR test, produced in 2002 by Richmond Products. The 2002 edition was compared to the original 1955 edition for a group of subjects with normal color vision and a group who had been previously diagnosed as having color vision deficiencies. The color deficient subjects spanned the range of severity among people with red-green deficiencies except for one individual who had a mild congenital tritan deficiency. The new test compared favorably with the original and in at least two areas, outperformed it. Among subjects with deutan defects the classification of severity correlated better with the anomaloscope results than the original; all the subjects who were classified as dichromats on the anomaloscope were rated as “severe” on the new HRR, while those diagnosed as anomalous trichromats were rated as mild or medium on the new test. Among those with moderate and severe defects the new test was highly accurate in correctly categorizing subjects as protan or deutan. In addition, a mild tritan subject made a tritan error on the new test whereas he was misdiagnosed as normal on the original.

Keywords

Pseudoisochromatic testColor blindnessColor visionSaturation discriminationDichromatic confusion lines
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2004 , pp. 431 - 436
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Birch, J. (1997). Clinical use of the American Optical Company (Hardy, Rand and Rittler) pseudoisochromatic plates for red-green colour deficiency. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 17, 248–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, K., Neitz, J., & Neitz, M. (2003). A novel missense mutation in the S cone photopigment in a male who made tritan errors on the Neitz Test of Color Vision. ARVO Abstracts CD-ROM, abstract 1907.
Hardy, L.H., Rand, G., & Rittler, M.C. (1954). HRR polychromatic plates. Journal of the Optical Society of America 44, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linksz, A. (1964). An Essay on Color Vision and Clinical Color-Vision Tests. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Neitz, M. & Neitz, J. (2001). A new test for mass screening of school age children for red-green color vision defects. Color Research & Application 26, S239–S249.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, H.M. (1971). Color vision testing in the United States Navy. In Visual Science. Proceedings of the 1968 International Symposium, ed. Pierce, J.R. & Levene, J.R., pp. 164–176. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Schmidt, I. (1952). Comparative evaluation of the Hardy-Rand-Rittler polychromatic plates for testing color vision. USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Project Number 21-31-013. Randolph Field, Texas.
Smith, V.C., Pokorny, J. (1975). Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm; Vision Research 15, 161–171.Google Scholar
Vos, J.J., Verkaik, W., Boogaard, J. (1972). The significance of the TMC and HRR color-vision-tests as to red-green defectiveness. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of the American Academy of Optometry 49, 847–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walls, G.L. (1959). How good is the HRR test for color blindness? American Journal of Optometry and Archives of the American Academy of Optometry 36, 169–193.Google Scholar