Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T22:46:55.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of motion and configural complexity on color transparency perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2006

PEGGY GERARDIN ,
PHILIPPE ROUD ,
SABINE SÜSSTRUNK  and
KENNETH KNOBLAUCH
PEGGY GERARDIN
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Audiovisual Communications, École Polytechnique F édérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland
PHILIPPE ROUD
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Audiovisual Communications, École Polytechnique F édérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland
SABINE SÜSSTRUNK
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Audiovisual Communications, École Polytechnique F édérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland
KENNETH KNOBLAUCH
Affiliation:
Inserm, U371, Cerveau et Vision, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 avenue du Doyen, Lépine, F-69500 Bron, France Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Institut F éderatif des Neurosciences (IFR 19), Bron, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We tested whether motion and configural complexity affect perceived transparency. A series of five coherent chromatic transformations in color space was applied across a figure: translation, convergence, shear, divergence and rotation. The stimuli consisted of a bipartite or a checkerboard configuration (10 × 10°), with a central static or moving overlay (5 × 5°). Three different luminance conditions (the plane of chromatic transformation oriented toward higher, lower, or equal luminances) were also tested for each of three modulation depths. For each stimulus, the observer judged whether the overlay appeared transparent or not. The main results indicated an interaction between the type of chromatic transformation and stimulus motion and complexity. For example, convergences are judged to appear transparent significantly more often when motion is added for bipartite configurations, or when they are generated in a checkerboard configuration. Surprisingly, shears that have been reported to appear opaque, are more frequently reported to appear transparent with short vector lengths and when combined with motion. Other transformations are also affected by motion, although the effectiveness of figural complexity on transparency seems to depend on both the type of color shifts and the presence of motion. The results indicate that adding motion and stimulus complexity are not necessarily neutral with respect to the chromatic shifts evoking transparency. Thus, studies that have used motion to enhance transparency may yield different results about the color shifts supporting transparency perception from those that did not. The same might be supposed for stimulus complexity under some conditions.

Keywords

Color visionTransparency perceptionMotionConfigural complexityPsychophysics
Type
PERCEPTION
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 23 , Issue 3-4 , May 2006 , pp. 591 - 596
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adelson, E.H. & Movshon, J.A. (1982). Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature 300, 523–525.Google Scholar
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Inference Theory, Petrov, B.N. & Csàki, F., eds., pp. 267–281. Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.
Anderson, B.L. (1997). A theory of illusory lightness and transparency in monocular and binocular images: the role of contour junctions. Perception 26, 419–453.Google Scholar
Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E., & Holland, P.W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chen, V. & D'Zmura, M. (1998). Test of a convergence model for color transparency. Perception 27, 595–608.Google Scholar
Dojat, M., Piettre, L., Delon-Martin, C., Pachot-Clouard, M., Segebarth, C., & Knoblauch, K. (2006). Global integration of local color differences in transparency perception: An fMRI study. Visual Neuroscience 23, 357–364.Google Scholar
D'Zmura, M., Colantoni, P., Knoblauch, K., & Laget, B. (1997). Color transparency. Perception 26, 471–492.Google Scholar
D'Zmura, M., Rinner, O., & Gegenfurtner, K.R. (2000). The colors seen behind transparent filters. Perception 29, 911–926.Google Scholar
Faul, F. & Ekroll, V. (2002). Psychophysical model of chromatic perceptual transparency based on subtractive color mixture. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 19, 1084–1095.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, J. & D'Zmura, M. (2000). Color appearance of surfaces viewed through fog. Perception 29, 1169–1184.Google Scholar
Khang, B.G. & Zaidi, Q. (2002). Cues and strategies for color constancy: perceptual scission, image junctions and transformational color matching. Vision Research 42, 211–226.Google Scholar
Khang, B.G. & Zaidi, Q. (2004). Illuminant color perception of spectrally filtered spotlights. Journal of Vision 4, 680–692, http://journalofvision.org/4/9/2/.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, K. & Dojat, M. (2003). Transparence, constance et apparence des couleurs. Pour La Science. Dossier Hors Séries 2, 16–19.Google Scholar
Knoke, D. & Burke, P. (1980). Log-Linear Models, vol. 20, Twin Cities, MN: Sage Publications.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
R Development Core Team. (2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-00-3, URL http://www.R-project.org.
Ripamonti, C. & Westland, S. (2003). Prediction of transparency perception based on cone-excitation ratios. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 20, 1673–1680.Google Scholar
Ripamonti, C., Westland, S., & Da Pos, O. (2004). Conditions for perceptual transparency. Journal of Electronic Imaging 13, 29–35.Google Scholar
Robilotto, R. & Zaidi, Q. (2004). Perceived transparency of neutral density filters across dissimilar backgrounds. Journal of Vision 4, 183–195.Google Scholar
Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S (4th edition). New York: Springer.
Westland, S. & Ripamonti, C. (2000). Invariant cone-excitation ratios may predict transparency. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 17, 255–264.Google Scholar