Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:54:42.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Frank Schaeffel
Affiliation:
Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
David Troilo
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, City College of The City University of New York, New York
Josh Wallman
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, City College of The City University of New York, New York
Howard C. Howland
Affiliation:
Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Abstract

The eyes of growing chicks adjust to correct for myopia (eye relatively long for the focal length of its optics) or hyperopia (eye relatively short for the focal length of its optics). Eyes made functionally hyperopic with negative spectacle lenses become myopic and long, whereas eyes made functionally myopic with positive spectacle lenses become hyperopic and short. We report here that these compensatory growth adjustments occur not only in normal eyes but also in eyes unable to accommodate (focus) because of lesions to the Edinger-Westphal nuclei. Thus, at least in chicks, accommodation is not necessary for growth that reduces refractive errors during development, and may not be necessary for the normal control of eye growth.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adel, N.L. (1966). Electromyographic and entopic studies suggesting a theory of action of the ciliary muscle in accommodation for near and its influence on the development of myopia. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 43, 2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedrossian, R.H. (1971). The effect of atropine on myopia. Annals of Ophthalmology 3, 891897.Google ScholarPubMed
Bell, G.R. (1980). The Coleman theory of accommodation and its relevance to myopia. Journal of the American Optometric Association 51, 582588.Google ScholarPubMed
Coleman, D.J. (1970). Unified model of accommodative mechanism. American Journal of Ophthalmology 69, 10631079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtin, B.J. (1985). The Myopias: Basic Science and Clinical Management. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ebenholtz, S.M. (1983). Accommodative hysteresis: a precursor for myopia? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 24, 513515.Google ScholarPubMed
Fulton, A.B., Dobson, V., Salem, D., Mar, C., Petersen, R.A., & Hansen, R.M. (1980). Cycloplegic refractions in infants and young children. American Journal of Ophthalmology 90, 239247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosvenor, T., Perrigin, D.M., Perrigin, J., & Maslovitz, B., (1987). Houston myopia control study: a randomized clinical trial, II: Final report by the patient care team. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 64, 482498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heaton, M.B. & Wayne, M.D. (1983). Patterns of extraocular innervation by the oculomotor complex in the chick. Journal of Comparative Neurology 216, 245252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiely, P.M., Crewther, S.G., Nathan, J., Brennan, N.A., Efron, N. & Madigan, M. (1987). A comparison of ocular development of the cynomolgus monkey and man. Clinical Visual Science 1, 269280.Google Scholar
Miles, F.A. & Wallman, J. (1990). Local ocular compensation for imposed local refractive error. Vision Research (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, K.H. & Young, F.A. (1975). Bifocal control of myopia. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 52, 758764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiner, A., Karten, H.J., Gamlin, P.D.R. & Erichsen, J.T. (1983).Parasympathetic ocular control: functional subdivisions and circuitry of the avian nucleus of Edinger-Westphal. Trends in Neuroscience 6, 140145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffel, F. & Howland, H.C. (1987). Corneal accommodation in chick and pigeon. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 160, 375384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffel, F. & Howland, H.C. (1988). Visual optics in normal and ametropic chickens. Clinical Visual Science 3, 8399.Google Scholar
Schaeffel, F., Farkas, L. & Howland, H.C. (1987). Infrared photoretinoscope. Applied Optics 26, 15051509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffel, F., Glasser, A. & Howland, H.C. (1988). Accommodation, refractive error, and eye growth in chickens. Vision Research 28, 639657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffel, F., Howland, H.C. & Farkas, L. (1986). Natural accommodation in the growing chicken. Vision Research 26, 19771993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troilo, D. (1989). The visual control of eye growth in chicks. Doctoral Dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Troilo, D., Gottlieb, M.D. & Wallman, J. (1987). Eye growth is controlled by both the retina and the brain. Current Eye Research 6, 993999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Alphen, G.W.H.M. (1961). On emmetropia and ametropia. Ophthalmologica (Suppl.) 142, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallman, J., Adams, J.I. & Trachtman, J.N. (1981). The eyes of young chicks grow toward emmetropia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 20, 557561.Google ScholarPubMed
Wallman, J. & Adams, J.I. (1987). Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks. Vision Research 27, 11391163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallman, J., Gottlieb, M.D., Rajaram, V. & Fugate-Wentzek, L. (1987). Local retinal regions control local eye growth and myopia. Science 237, 7377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, F.A. (1977). The nature and control of myopia. Journal of the American Optometric Association 48, 451457.Google ScholarPubMed