Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Victor, Jonathan D.
and
Conte, Mary M.
1990.
Motion mechanisms have only limited access to form information.
Vision Research,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 2,
p.
289.
Victor, Jonathan D.
and
Conte, Mary M.
1991.
Spatial organization of nonlinear interactions in form perception.
Vision Research,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 9,
p.
1457.
Graham, Norma
Sutter, Anne
Venkatesan, Charu
and
Humaran, Maria
1992.
Non‐linear processes in perceived region segregation: orientation selectivity of complex channels.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
142.
Graham, Norma
Beck, Jacob
and
Sutter, Anne
1992.
Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: Effects of sign and amount of contrast.
Vision Research,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 4,
p.
719.
Victor, Jonathan D.
and
Conte, Mary M.
1994.
Investigation of a patient with severely impaired direction discrimination: Evidence against the intersection-of-constraints model.
Vision Research,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 2,
p.
267.
Victor, Jonathan D.
1994.
Images, statistics, and textures: implications of triple correlation uniqueness for texture statistics and the Julesz conjecture: comment.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 5,
p.
1680.
Sutter, Anne
Sperling, George
and
Chubb, Charles
1995.
Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms.
Vision Research,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 7,
p.
915.
Sutter, Anne
and
Graham, Norma
1995.
Investigating simple and complex mechanisms in texture segregation using the speed-accuracy tradeoff method.
Vision Research,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 20,
p.
2825.
Victor, Jonathan D.
and
Conte, Mary M.
1996.
The role of high-order phase correlations in texture processing.
Vision Research,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 11,
p.
1615.
Joseph, Julian S.
Victor, Jonathan D.
and
Optican, Lance M.
1997.
Scaling effects in the perception of higher-order spatial correlations.
Vision Research,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 22,
p.
3097.
Beason-Held, Lori L
Purpura, Keith P
Krasuski, Jack S
Maisog, Joe Ma
Daly, Eileen M
Mangot, David J
Desmond, Richard E
Optican, Lance M
Schapiro, Mark B
and
VanMeter, John W
1998.
Cortical regions involved in visual texture perception: a fMRI study.
Cognitive Brain Research,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
111.
Graham, Norma
and
Sutter, Anne
1998.
Spatial summation in simple (fourier) and complex (non-fourier) texture channels.
Vision Research,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 2,
p.
231.
Victor, Jonathan D.
and
Conte, Mary M.
1999.
Short-range vernier acuity: interactions of temporal frequency, temporal phase, and stimulus polarity.
Vision Research,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 20,
p.
3351.
Graham, Norma
Rico, Marjorie
Offen, Shani
and
Scott, William
1999.
Texture segregation shows only a very small lower-hemifield advantage.
Vision Research,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 6,
p.
1171.
Hartmann, E.E.
Garcia-Quispe, L.A.
and
Lee, K.
1999.
Development of Texture Discrimination in Human Infants: A Cross-sectional VEP Study.
p.
SaA3.
Chubb, Charles
and
Yellott, John I.
2000.
Every discrete, finite image is uniquely determined by its dipole histogram.
Vision Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 5,
p.
485.
Levine, B.K.
Beason–Held, L.L.
Purpura, K.P.
Aronchick, D.M.
Optican, L.M.
Alexander, G.E.
Horwitz, B.
Rapoport, S.I.
and
Schapiro, M.B.
2000.
Age-related differences in visual perception: a PET study.
Neurobiology of Aging,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 4,
p.
577.
Maddess, T.
and
Nagai, Y.
2001.
Discriminating of isotrigon textures.
Vision Research,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 28,
p.
3837.
Tyler, Christopher W
2004.
Beyond fourth-order texture discrimination: generation of extreme-order and statistically-balanced textures.
Vision Research,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 18,
p.
2187.
Victor, Jonathan D.
and
Conte, Mary M.
2004.
Visual working memory for image statistics.
Vision Research,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 6,
p.
541.