Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:11:16.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chromatic assimilation unaffected by perceived depth of inducing light

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2005

STEVEN K. SHEVELL  and
DINGCAI CAO
STEVEN K. SHEVELL
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago, Chicago
DINGCAI CAO
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago, Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chromatic assimilation is a shift toward the color of nearby light. Several studies conclude that a neural process contributes to assimilation but the neural locus remains in question. Some studies posit a peripheral process, such as retinal receptive-field organization, while others claim the neural mechanism follows depth perception, figure/ground segregation, or perceptual grouping. The experiments here tested whether assimilation depends on a neural process that follows stereoscopic depth perception. By introducing binocular disparity, the test field judged in color was made to appear in a different depth plane than the light that induced assimilation. The chromaticity and spatial frequency of the inducing light, and the chromaticity of the test light, were varied. Chromatic assimilation was found with all inducing-light sizes and chromaticities, but the magnitude of assimilation did not depend on the perceived relative depth planes of the test and inducing fields. We found no evidence to support the view that chromatic assimilation depends on a neural process that follows binocular combination of the two eyes' signals.

Keywords

Chromatic inductionChromatic assimilationStereo disparityFigure/ground segregation
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2004 , pp. 373 - 376
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

DeValois, R.L. & DeValois, K.K. (1975). Neural coding of color. In Handbook of Perception, Vol. 5, ed. Carterette, E.C. & Friedman, M.P., pp. 117–166. New York: Academic Press.
de Weert, C.M.M. (1991). Assimilation versus contrast. In From Pigments to Perception, ed. Valberg, A. & Lee, B.B., pp. 305–311. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef
de Weert, C.M.M. & van Kruysbergen, M.A.W.H. (1987). Subjective contour strength and perceptual superimposition: Transparency as a special case. In The Perception of Illusory Contours, ed. S. Petry & G. Meyer, pp. 165–170. New York: Springer.CrossRef
de Weert, C.M.M. & van Kruysbergen, M.A.W.H. (1997). Assimilation: Central and peripheral effects. Perception 26, 1217–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fach, C. & Sharpe, L.T. (1986). Assimilative hue shifts in color gratings depend on bar width. Perception and Psychophysics 40, 412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L., Coren, S., & Rivers, G. (1970). The effect of attention on brightness contrast and assimilation. American Journal of Psychology 83, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, W. (1923). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Änderung von Farben unter dem Einfluss von Gestalten (Angleichungsercsheinungen) (Experimental investigations on the alteration of color under the influence of Gestalten). Zeitschrift für Psychologie 92, 249–325.Google Scholar
Helson, H. (1963). Studies of anomalous contrast and assimilation. Journal of the Optical Society of America 53, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurvich, L.M. & Jameson, D. (1974). Opponent processes as a model of neural organization. American Psychologist 29, 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, D. & Hurvich, L.M. (1989). Essay concerning color constancy. Annual Review of Psychology 40, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D.L. (1988). Assimilation is due to one perceived whole and contrast is due to two perceived wholes. New Ideas in Psychology 6, 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, D.I.A. & Boynton, R.M. (1979). Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. Journal of the Optical Society of America 69, 1183–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marimont, D.H. & Wandell, B.A. (1994). Matching color images: The effects of axial chromatic aberration. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 12, 3113–3122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monnier, P. & Shevell, S.K. (2003). Large shifts in color appearance from patterned chromatic backgrounds. Nature Neuroscience 6, 801–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulden, B., Kingdom, F., & Wink, B. (1993). Colour pools, brightness pools, assimilation and the spatial resolving power of the human colour-vision system. Perception 22, 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevell, S.K. & Cao, D. (2003). Chromatic assimilation: Evidence for a neural mechanism. In Normal and Defective Colour Vision, ed. Mollon, J.D., Pokorny, J. & Knoblauch, K., pp. 114–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Shevell, S.K. & Wei, J. (1998). Chromatic induction: Border contrast or adaptation to surrounding light? Vision Research 38, 1561–1566.Google Scholar
Smith, V.C., Jin, P., & Pokorny, J. (2001). The role of spatial frequency in color induction. Vision Research 41, 1007–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taya, R., Ehrenstein, C., & Cavonius, R. (1995). Varying the strength of the Munker–White effect by stereoscopic viewing. Perception 24, 685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lier, R. & Wagemans, J. (1997). Perceptual grouping measured by color assimilation: Regularity versus proximity. Acta Psychologica 97, 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bezold, W. (1876). The Theory of Color and its Relation to Art and Art-Industry. Boston, Massachusetts: Prang.CrossRef
Wyszecki, G. (1986). Color Appearance. In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol I: Sensory Processes and Perception, ed. Boff, K.R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J.P., pp. 9-1–9-57. New York: Wiley.
Xian, S. & Shevell, S.K. (2004). Changes in color appearance caused by perceptual grouping. Visual Neuroscience 21, 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar