Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:31:27.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UV responses in the retina of the turtle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1999

D.F. VENTURA
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience and Behavior, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil
J.M. de SOUZA
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience and Behavior, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil
R.D. DEVOE
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington
Y. ZANA
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience and Behavior, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil

Abstract

To study processing of UV stimuli in the retina of the turtle, Trachemys dorbignii, we recorded intracellular responses to spectral light from 89 cells: 54 horizontal (47 monophasic, five (R/G) biphasic and two (Y/B) triphasic), 14 bipolar, 12 amacrine, and nine ganglion cells. Spectral sensitivities were measured with monochromatic flashes or with the dynamic constant response method in dark or chromatic adapted states. Stray light and second-order harmonics were also measured. (1) All cells responded to UV stimuli, although none had maximum sensitivity in the UV. (2) Most horizontal, bipolar, and amacrine cells had red-peaked spectral sensitivities. (3) Red adaptation of all monophasic horizontal cells indicated a single red input, except one that had additional peaks in the blue and UV. (4) Responses of biphasic and triphasic horizontal cells to UV light were always hyperpolarizing. Opposition between hyperpolarizing and depolarizing responses at long wavelengths indicates that UV responses were not due to the beta band of red receptors. (5) An unstained spectrally opponent bipolar cell hyperpolarized in the center to green light and antagonistically depolarized in the surround to UV, blue, and green flashes, but hyperpolarized to red. (6) All dark-adapted amacrine cells were red-peaked monophasic cells, but red adaptation broadened their spectral-sensitivity curves or displaced their peaks. An A15, an A18, and an A24 wide-field amacrine cell were stained. (7) A G15 bistratified ganglion cell is shown here for the first time to be spectrally opponent. This UVB/RG cell depolarized to UV and blue and hyperpolarized to red and green. It differs from previously reported turtle ganglion cells in being color opponent in the entire field, not only in the surround, and in showing spatial opponency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)