Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:05:33.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction of a pattern-induced motion aftereffect by binocular rivalry suggests the involvement of extrastriate mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Rick Van Der Zwan ,
Peter Wenderoth  and
David Alais
Rick Van Der Zwan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Peter Wenderoth
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
David Alais
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research suggests that plaid-induced motion aftereffects (MAEs) involve extrastriate mechanisms (Wenderoth et al., 1988). There is evidence also that binocular rivalry occurs beyond VI and that it disrupts the processing of MAEs which are believed to be based upon extrastriate mechanisms (e.g. the spiral MAE) but not MAEs, such as linear MAE induced by a drifting grating, which are thought to arise in striate cortex (Wiesenfelder & Blake, 1990). The logical inference is that binocular rivalry during drifting plaid-induced adaptation should reduce the MAEs which result. We report experiments which confirm this prediction.

Keywords

MotionExtrastriatePlaidsAftereffectBinocular rivalry
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , July 1993 , pp. 703 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelson, E.H. & Movshon, J.A. (1982). Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature 300, 523–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allman, J.M., Miezin, F. & McGuiness, E. (1985). Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classic receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurones. Annual Review of Neuroscience 8, 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. & Fox, R. (1974). Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature 249, 488–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, R., O’Shea, R.P. & Mueller, T.J. (1992). Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Visual Neuroscience 8, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, D. & Wenderoth, P. (1993). Determinants of two-dimensional motion aftereffects induced by simultaneously and alternately presented plaid components. Vision Research 33, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavanagh, P. & Favreau, O.E. (1980). Motion aftereffect: A global mechanism for the perception of rotation. Perception 9, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaudhuri, A. (1991). Eye movements and the motion aftereffect: Alternatives to the induced motion hypothesis. Vision Research 31, 1639–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, H.W. & Fowler, F.G. (ed.) (1973). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heeley, D.W. & Buchanan-Smith, H.M. (1992). Changes in the direction of motion induced by changes in spatial and temporal structure. Perception 21 (Suppl. 2), 66–67.Google Scholar
Hershenson, M. (1984). Phantom spiral aftereffect: Evidence for global mechanisms in perception. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22, 535–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmkuhle, S.W. & Fox, R. (1975). Effect of binocular rivalry sup pression on the motion aftereffect. Vision Research 15, 855–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logothetis, N.K. & Schall, J.D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science 245, 761–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maunsell, J.H.R. & Newsome, W.T. (1987). Visual processing in the monkey extrastriate cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 10, 363–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Movshon, J.A., Adelson, E.H., Gizzi, M.S. & Newsome, W.T. (1985). The analysis of moving visual patterns. In Pattern Recognition Mechanisms, ed. Chagas, C, Gattass, R. & Gross, C, pp. 117–151. Rome, Italy: Vatican Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shea, R.P. & Crassini, B. (1981). Interocular transfer of the motion aftereffect is not reduced by binocular rivalry. Vision Research 21, 801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakata, H., Shibutani, H., Ito, Y. & Tsurugai, K. (1986). Parietal cortical neurons responding to rotary movement of visual stimulus in space. Experimental Brain Research 61, 658–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidman, S.H., Leigh, R.J. & Thomas, C.W. (1992). Eye movements during motion aftereffect. Vision Research 32, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, , (1992). Coherence of plaids comprising components of disparate spatial frequencies. Vision Research 32, 393–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoner, G.R. & Albright, T.D. (1992). Neural correlates of perceptual motion coherence. Nature 358, 412–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, K. & Saito, H. (1989). Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 62, 626–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, S. (1986). Artificial intelligence and the brain: Computational studies of the visual system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 9, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Essen, D.C., Anderson, C.H. & Felleman, D.J. (1992). Information processing in the primate visual system: An integrated systems perspective. Science 255, 419–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, N.J. & Wenderoth, P. (1978). The influence of colour and contrast rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt aftereffect. Vision Research 18, 827–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenderoth, P., Bray, R. & Johnstone, S. (1988). Psychophysical evidence for an extrastriate contribution to a pattern-selective motion aftereffect. Perception 17, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiesenfelder, H. & Blake, R. (1990). The site of binocular rivalry relative to the analysis of motion in the human visual system. Journal of Neuroscience 10, 3880–3888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar