Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:00:50.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gain control from beyond the classical receptive field in primate primary visual cortex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2003

BEN S. WEBB
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
CHRIS J. TINSLEY
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
NICK E. BARRACLOUGH
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
AMANDA PARKER
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
ANDREW M. DERRINGTON
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

Abstract

Gain control is a salient feature of information processing throughout the visual system. Heeger (1991, 1992) described a mechanism that could underpin gain control in primary visual cortex (V1). According to this model, a neuron's response is normalized by dividing its output by the sum of a population of neurons, which are selective for orientations covering a broad range. Gain control in this scheme is manifested as a change in the semisaturation constant (contrast gain) of a V1 neuron. Here we examine how flanking and annular gratings of the same or orthogonal orientation to that preferred by a neuron presented beyond the receptive field modulate gain in V1 neurons in anesthetized marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). To characterize how gain was modulated by surround stimuli, the Michaelis–Menten equation was fitted to response versus contrast functions obtained under each stimulus condition. The modulation of gain by surround stimuli was modelled best as a divisive reduction in response gain. Response gain varied with the orientation of surround stimuli, but was reduced most when the orientation of a large annular grating beyond the classical receptive field matched the preferred orientation of neurons. The strength of surround suppression did not vary significantly with retinal eccentricity or laminar distribution. In the marmoset, as in macaques (Angelucci et al., 2002a, b), gain control over the sort of distances reported here (up to 10 deg) may be mediated by feedback from extrastriate areas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)