Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:56:18.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrophysiological estimates of visual sensitivity in albino and pigmented mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Daniel G. Green ,
Pilar Herreros De Tejada  and
Marilyn J. Glover
Daniel G. Green
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Pilar Herreros De Tejada
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Marilyn J. Glover
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have estimated the absolute threshold of congenic albino and pigmented mice (C57) using ERG, pupillary light reflex, and VHP. We are unable to detect strain differences using ERGs or VEPs, but pupillary thresholds appear to be different. In addition, as we have previously reported for rats, VEP thresholds are considerably lower than the ERG b−wave thresholds. The VEP thresholds agree with behavioral data from pigmented mice made by others. The mouse VEP thresholds are close to the VEP thresholds in rats and the psychophysical thresholds of two human observers.

Keywords

AlbinoPigmentedMouseElectroretinogramEvoked potentialAbsolute threshold
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , September 1994 , pp. 919 - 925
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balkema, G.W. (1988). Elevated dark-adapted thresholds in albino rodents. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 29, 544–549.Google ScholarPubMed
Balkema, G.W. & Drager, U.C. (1991). Impaired visual thresholds in hypopigmented animals. Visual Neuroscience 6, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balkema, G.W., Mangini, N.J., Pinto, L.H. & Vanable, J.W. Jr., (1984). Visually evoked eye movements in mouse mutants and inbred strains. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 25, 795–800.Google ScholarPubMed
Balkema, G.W. & Pinto, L.H. (1982). Electrophysiology of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse: A study of a normally pigmented mouse and a congenic hypopigmentation mutant pearl. Journal of Neurophysiology 48, 968–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkema, G.W., Pinto, L.H., Drager, U.C. & Vanable, J.W. (1981). Characterization of abnormalities in the visual system of the mutant mouse pearl. Journal of Neuroscience 1(11), 1320–1329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, F.W. & Kulikowski, J.J. (1972). The visual evoked potential as a function of contrast sensitivity of a grating pattern. Journal of Physiology 222, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, P. (1978). Visual acuity in hooded rats: Effects of superior collicular or posterior neocortical lesions. Brain Research 157, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defries, J.C., Hegmann, J.P. & Weir, M.W. (1966). Open-field behavior in mice: Evidence for a major gene effect mediated by the visual system. Science 154, 1577–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, V.C. & Olsen, J.F. (1980). Origins of crossed and uncrossed retinal projections in pigmented and albino mice. Journal of Comparative Neurology 191, 383–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreher, B., Sefton, A.J., Ni, S.Y. & Nisbett, G. (1985). The morphology, number, distribution and central projections of Class I retinal ganglion cells in albino and hooded rats. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution 26, 10–48.Google Scholar
Green, D.G., Herreros De Tejada, P. & Glover, M.J. (1991). Are albino rats night blind? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 32, 2366–2371.Google ScholarPubMed
Hayes, J.M. & Balkema, G.W. (1993). Elevated dark-adapted thresholds in hypopigmented mice measured with a water maze screening apparatus. Behavior Genetics 23, 395–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herreros De Tejada, P., Green, D.G. & Muñoz Tedó, C. (1992). Visual thresholds in albino and pigmented rats. Visual Neuroscience 9, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Vail, J.H., Nixon, R. & Sidman, R.L. (1978). Genetic control of retinal ganglion cell projections. Journal of Comparative Neurology 182, 399–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legg, C.R. (1986). Spatial contrast and flicker sensitivity following medial talamic or visual cortex lesion in hooded rats. Behavioral Brain Research 19, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, R.D. (1965). Uncrossed visual pathways of hooded and albino rats. Science 149, 1506–1507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero, V.M., Rojas, A. & Torrealba, F. (1973). Retinotopic organization of striate and prestriate visual cortex in the albino rat. Brain Research 53, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Tedó, C., Herreros De Tejada, P. & Green, D.G. (1994). Behavioral estimates of absolute threshold in rat. Visual Neuroscience (in press).Google Scholar
Overton, P., Dean, P. & Redgrave, P. (1985). Detection of visual stimuli in far periphery by rats: Possible role of superior colliculus. Experimental Brain Research 59, 559–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paylor, R., Baskall, L. & Wehner, J.M. (1993). Behavioral dissociations between C57 BL/6 and DBA/Z mice on learning and memory tasks: A Hippocampal-disfunction hypothesis. Psychobiology 21(1), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santucci, A.C. & Treichler, F.R. (1985). Effect of posterior cortical lesion on two versions of the brightness-discrimination task. Physiological Psychology 13(2), 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, J. (1983). Parallel Processing in the Visual System. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trejo, L.J. & Cicerone, C.M. (1982). Retinal sensitivity measured by the pupillary light reflex in RCS and albino rats. Vision Research 22, 1163–1171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Upchurch, M. & Wehner, J.M. (1988). Differences between inbred strains of mice in Morris water maze performance. Behavior Genetics 18, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed