Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:07:28.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of monocular deprivation on the development of visual inhibitory interactions in kittens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Harriet D. Speed ,
M. Concetta Morrone  and
David C. Burr
Harriet D. Speed
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
M. Concetta Morrone
Affiliation:
Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy
David C. Burr
Affiliation:
Istituto di Neurofisiologia del CNR, Via S. Zeno 51, Pisa, 56100Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A visual-evoked-potential (VEP) masking technique was used to assess the effects of short- and long-term monocular deprivation on the development of visual inhibitory interactions in kittens. VEP contrast-response curves were recorded in response to contrast-reversed sinusoidal gratings, both with and without superimposed high-contrast masks. The contrast-response curves measured from the nondeprived eye were similar to those of normal cats: with no mask VEP amplitudes increase with contrast up to saturation at about 10% contrast; parallel masks shift the curves to the right, decreasing thresholds; and orthogonal masks decrease the slope of the contrast-response curves without affecting thresholds. After monocular deprivation (either brief or extensive), the contrast-response curves without mask did not show the typical response saturation, and neither parallel nor orthogonal mask had any effect on the contrast-response curves. The masking effects did not return after 100 days of normal vision, although contrast sensitivity and acuity recovered to about half of the normal levels during that period. The results indicate that the inhibitory intracortical circuitry that mediates the orientation-dependent masking effects are highly vulnerable to visual experience.

Keywords

VisionInhibitionDevelopmentMonocular deprivationVisual-evoked potentialMasking
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , October 1991 , pp. 335 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bear, M.F., Schmechel, D.E. & Ebner, F.F. (1985). Glutamic-acid decarboxylase in the striate cortex of normal and monocularly deprived kittens. Journal of Neuroscience 5, 126–1275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisti, S. & Carmignoto, G. (1986). Monocular deprivation in kittens differently affects crossed and uncrossed visual pathways. Vision Research 26, 875–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blasdel, G.G. & Pettigrew, J.D. (1978). Effect of prior visual experience on cortical recovery from the effects of unilateral eyelid suture in kittens. Journal of Physiology (London) 274, 601–619.Google Scholar
Burr, D.C. & Morrone, M.C. (1987). Inhibitory interactions in the human visual system revealed in pattern-evoked potentials. Journal of Physiology (London) 389, 1–21.Google Scholar
Cynader, M. & Shaw, C. (1990). GABA receptors in postnatal development of cat visual cortex. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 31, 175.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, A. & Maffei, L. (1979). Responses of cortical neurones of monocularly deprived kittens: a re-examination. Journal of Physiology (London) 291, 35P.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, A., Pirchio, M. & Spinelli, D. (1983). Development of retinal and cortical responses to pattern reversal in infants: a selective review. Behavioral Brain Research 10, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, R.D. & Ohzawa, I. (1988). Monocularly deprived cats: binocular tests of cortical cells reveal functional connections from the deprived eye. Journal of Neuroscience 8, 2491–2506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giffin, F. & Mitchell, D.E. (1978). The rate of recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens. Journal of Physiology (London) 274, 511–537.Google Scholar
Hendry, S.H.C. & Jones, E.G. (1986). Reduction in numbers of immunostained GABAergic neurones in deprived-eye dominance columns of monkey area 17. Nature 320, 750–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1970). The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. Journal of Physiology (London) 206, 419–436.Google Scholar
Mioche, L. & Singer, W. (1989). Chronic recordings from single sites of kitten striate cortex during experience-dependent modifications of receptive field properties. Journal of Neurobiology 62, 185–197.Google ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, D.E. (1988). The extent of visual recovery from early monocular or binocular visual deprivation in kittens. Journal of Physiology 395, 639–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, D.E., Cynader, M. & Movshon, J.A. (1977). Recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation in kittens. Journal of Comparative Neuroscience 176, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, D.E. & Timney, B. (1984). Postnatal development of function in the mammalian visual system. In Handbook of Physiology, Section I: The Nervous System ed. Darian-Smith, I., pp. 507–555. Bethesda: American Physiology Society.Google Scholar
Mitzdorf, U. & Singer, W. (1980). Monocular activation of visual cortex in normal and monocularly deprived cats: an analysis of evoked potentials. Journal of Physiology (London) 304, 203–304.Google Scholar
Morrone, M.C., Burr, D.C. & Speed, H.D. (1988). Cross-orientation inhibition in cat is GABA mediated. Experimental Brain Research 67, 635–644.Google Scholar
Morrone, M.C. & Speed, H. (1987). The effect of visual experience on the development of cortical inhibition in cat. Journal of Physiology (London) 396, 143P.Google Scholar
Morrone, M.C., Speed, H.D. & Burr, D.C. (1991). Development of inhibitory interactions in kittens. Visual Neuroscience 7, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Movshon, J.A. (1976). Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in the kitten's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 261, 125–174.Google Scholar
Movshon, A. & Dursteler, M.R. (1977). Effects of brief periods of unilateral eye closure on the kitten's visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology 40, 1255–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Movshon, J.A. & Sluyters, R.C.Van (1981). Visual neuronal development. Annual Review of Psychology 32, 477–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mower, G.D., White, W.F. & Rustad, R. (1986). [3H]-muscimol binding of GABA receptors in the visual cortex of normal and monocularly deprived cats. Brain Research 380, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, C.R. & Freeman, R.D. (1978). Monocular deprivation and recovery during sensitive period in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 41, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, M.S. & Spear, P.D. (1982). Organization of visual pathways in normal and visual deprived cats. Physiological Reviews 62, 738–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, W. (1977). Effects of monocular deprivation on excitatory and inhibitory pathways in cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research 30, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsumoto, T. & Suda, K. (1978). Evidence for excitatory connections from the deprived eye to the visual cortex in monocularly deprived kittens. Experimental Brain Research 153, 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar