Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:03:11.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of eliminating retinal Y cell input on center-surround interactions in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Chun Wang ,
B. Dreher  and
W. Burke
B. Dreher
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Histology, University of SydneyN.S.W. 2006, Australia Institute for Biomedical Research (F13), University of SydneyN.S.W. 2006, Australia
W. Burke
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Histology, University of SydneyN.S.W. 2006, Australia Department of Physiology, University of SydneyN.S.W. 2006, Australia Institute for Biomedical Research (F13), University of SydneyN.S.W. 2006, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this project was to investigate the interaction between Y retinal ganglion cells and the cells of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) of the cat, with particular reference to center-surround antagonism and intrageniculate inhibition. Responses of cells in the LGNd were studied by stimulating the retina with spots of light of constant contrast but varying size. The peak discharges of nonlagged X (XN) cells were strongly suppressed with increase in spot size but the responses of lagged X (XL) cells and nonlagged Y (YN) cells were inhibited much less strongly. The effect of the Y system on these responses was examined by producing a selective block of conduction in Y fibers in one optic nerve by means of a pressure cuff (Y-blocking). These effects were assessed by measuring the peak discharge rates and by calculation of a “peak suppression index.” Y-blocking had no significant effect on the peak suppression index of XL, cells in either lamina or on YN cells in the normal (not Y-blocked) lamina but had significant effects on the responses of XN cells, causing a decrease in peak suppression index, both for cells in laminae receiving their principal excitatory input from the Y-blocked eye (both lamina A and lamina A1 ) as well as those in lamina A (but not lamina A1 ) receiving their excitatory input from the normal eye. These effects were obtained with relatively large spots of light. Thus Y optic fibers have both intralaminar (monocular) and interlaminar (binocular) inhibitory effects on XN cells. In addition to these suppressive effects, the experiments also show that ipsilaterally projecting Y fibers have facilitatory effects on XN cells in lamina A when small spots of light, about optimal size for the XN cell, are used. These results suggest that the Y system plays a powerful role in shaping the responses of XN cells, possibly enhancing visual acuity.

Keywords

Center/surround antagonismSelective Y-blockIntrageniculate inhibitionLagged/nonlagged cellsVisual acuity
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , November 1996 , pp. 1089 - 1097
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berardi, N. & Morrone, M.C. (1984). The role of γ−aminobutyric acid mediated inhibition in the response properties of cat lateral geniculate nucleus neurones. Journal of Physiology 357, 505–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, P.O., Jeremy, D. & Lance, J.W. (1953). The optic nerve. Properties of a central tract. Journal of Physiology 121, 415–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullier, J. & Norton, T.T. (1979 a). X and Y relay cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus: Quantitative analysis of receptive-field properties and classification. Journal of Neurophysiology 42, 244–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullier, J. & Norton, T.T. (1979 b). Comparison of receptive-field properties of X and Y ganglion cells with X and Y lateral geniculate cells in the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 42, 274–291.Google Scholar
Burke, W., Cottee, L.J., Garvey, J., Kumarasinghe, R. & Kyriacou, C. (1986). Selective degeneration of optic nerve fibres in the cat produced by a pressure block. Journal of Physiology 376, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, W., Dreher, B., Michalski, A., Cleland, E.G. & Rowe, M.H. (1992). Effects of selective pressure block of Y-type optic nerve fibers on the receptive-field properties of neurons in the striate cortex of the cat. Visual Neuroscience 9, 47–64.Google Scholar
Cleland, B.C., Dubin, M.W. & Levick, W.R. (1971). Sustained and transient neurones in the cat's retina and lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Physiology 217, 473–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleland, B.C., Levick, W.R., Morstyn, R. & Wagner, H.G. (1976). Lateral geniculate relay of slowly conducting retinal afferents to cat visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 255, 299–320.Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, C. & Gilbert, C.D. (1995). Topographic reorganization in the striate cortex of the adult cat and monkey is cortically mediated. Journal of Neuroscience 15, 1631–1647.Google Scholar
Eysel, U.T., Gonzalez-Aguilar, F. & Mayer, U. (1980). A functional sign of reorganization in the visual system of adult cats: Lateral geniculate neurons with displaced receptive fields after lesions of the nasal retina. Brain Research 181, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuda, Y. & Stone, J. (1976). Evidence of differential inhibitory influences on X- and Y-type relay cells in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Research 113, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, P. & Mackay, D.M. (1977). Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture. Experimental Brain Research 30, 275–296.Google ScholarPubMed
Hartveit, E. & Hegoelund, P. (1992). The effect of contrast on the visual response of lagged and nonlagged cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Visual Neuroscience 9, 515–525.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, K.-P., Stone, J. & Sherman, S.M. (1972). Relay of receptive field properties in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 35, 518–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1961). Integrative action in the cat's lateral geniculate body. Journal of Physiology 155, 385–398.Google Scholar
Humphrey, A.L. & Weller, R.E. (1988). Functionally distinct groups of X cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 268, 429–447.Google Scholar
Levick, W.R., Cleland, B.C. & Dubin, M.W. (1972). Lateral geniculate neurons of cat: Retinal inputs and physiology. Investigative Ophthalmology 11, 302–311.Google Scholar
LindströM, S. & Wróbel, A. (1990). Private inhibitory systems for the X and Y pathways in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Journal of Physiology 429, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastronarde, D.N. (1987 a). Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Receptive-field properties and classification of cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 357–380.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D.N. (1987 b). Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. 11. Retinal inputs and the generation of receptive-field properties. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 381–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, P.C. & Sillito, A.M. (1989). The binocular input to cells in the feline dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). Journal of Physiology 415, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pape, H.-C. & Eysel, U.T. (1986). Binocular interactions in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: GABAergic inhibition reduced by dominant afferent activity. Experimental Brain Research 61, 265–271.Google Scholar
Rodieck, R.W., Pettigrew, J.D., Bishop, P.O. & Nikara, T. (1967). Residual eye movements in receptive-field studies of paralyzed cats. Vision Research 7, 107–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, K.J., Bishop, P.O. & Darian-Smith, I. (1971). The properties of the binocular receptive fields of lateral geniculate neurons. Experimental Brain Research 13, 178–207.Google Scholar
Saul, A.B. & Humphrey, A.L. (1990). Spatial and temporal response properties of lagged and nonlagged cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Neurophysiology 64, 206–224.Google Scholar
Schmielau, F. & Singer, W. (1977). The role of visual cortex for binocular interactions in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Research 120, 354–361.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill Co.Google Scholar
Sillito, A.M. & Kemp, J.A. (1983). The influence of GABAergic inhibitory processes on the receptive field structure of X and Y cells in cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). Brain Research 277, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, W. & Bedworth, N. (1973). Inhibitory interaction between X and Y units in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Research 49, 291–307.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Dreher, B. & Burke, W. (1994 a). Non-dominant suppression in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: Laminar differences and class specificity. Experimental Brain Research 97, 451–465.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Dreher, B. & Burke, W. (1994 b). Is surround suppression in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat class-specific? Proceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society 5, 110.Google Scholar
Wilson, P.D., Rowe, M.H. & Stone, J. (1976). Properties of relay cells in cat's lateral geniculate nucleus: A comparison of W-cells with X-and Y-cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 39, 1193–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolbarsht, M.L., MacNichol, E.F. & Wagner, H.G. (1960). Glass insulated platinum microelectrode. Science 132, 1309–1310.Google Scholar