Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:11:45.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of threshold on the relationship between the receptive-field profile and the spatial-frequency tuning cure in simple cells of the cat's striate cortex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Y. Tadmor  and
D. J. Tolhurst
Y. Tadmor
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Cambridge, England
D. J. Tolhurst
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Cambridge, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is believed that spatial summation in most simple cells is a linear process. If this were so, then the Fourier transform of a simple cell's line weighting function should predict the cell's spatial frequency tuning curve. We have compared such predictions with experimental measurements and have found a consistent discrepancy: the predicted tuning curve is much too broad. We show qualitatively that this kind of discrepancy is consistent with the well-known threshold nonlinearity shown by most cortical cells. We have tested quantitatively whether a response threshold could explain the observed disagreements between predictions and measurements: a least-squares minimization routine was used to fit the inverse Fourier Transform of the measured frequency tuning curve to the measured line weighting function. The fitting procedure permitted us to introduce a threshold to the reconstructed line weighting function. The results of the analysis show that, for all of the cells tested, the Fourier transforms produced better predictions when a response threshold was included in the model. For some cells, the actual magnitude of the response threshold was measured independently and found to be compatible with that suggested by the model. The effects of nonlinearities of spatial summation are considered.

Keywords

Simple cellsThresholdSpatial frequencySpatial summationStriate cortex
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 3 , Issue 5 , November 1989 , pp. 445 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, B.W. & Pollen, D.A. (1979). Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive-field profile of simple cells. Journal of Physiology 287, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, F.W., Cooper, G.F. & Enroth-Cugell, C. (1969). The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology, 203, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, G.F. & Robson, J.G. (1968). Successive transformations of spatial information in the visual system. Institute of Electrical Engineers Conference Proceedings 42, 134–143.Google Scholar
Dean, A.F. (1981). The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research 44, 437–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, A.F. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1983). On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. Journal of Physiology 344, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, A.F. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1986). Factors influencing the temporal phase of response to bar and grating stimuli for simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research 62, 143–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeValois, R.L., Albrecht, D.G. & Thorell, L.G. (1978). Cortical cells: bar and edge detectors or spatial-frequency analyzers? In Frontiers in Visual Science, ed. Cool, S.J. & Smith, E.L. pp. 544–556. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeValois, R.L., Thorell, L.G. & Albrecht, D.G. (1985). Periodicity of striate cortex cell receptive fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2, 1115–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, D.J. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1986). The structure and symmetry of simple cell receptive-field profiles in the cat's visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 228, 379–400.Google ScholarPubMed
Glezer, V.D., Tsherbach, T.A., Gauselman, V.E. & Bondarko, V.M. (1980). Linear and nonlinear properties of simple and complex receptive fields in area 17 of the cat visula cortex. Biological Cybernetics 37, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glezer, V.D., Tsherbach, T.A., Gauselman, V.E. & Bondarko, V.M. (1982). Spatio-temporal organization of receptive fields of the cats striate cortex. Biological Cybernetics 43, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D.H. & Weisel, T.N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 148, 574–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Weisel, T.N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architrecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160, 106–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, J.P. & Palmer, L.A. (1987). An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in the cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 58, 1233–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulikowski, J.J. & Bishop, P.O. (1981). Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in the cat visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research 44, 386–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, B.B., Elepfandt, A. & Virsu, V. (1981). Phase of responses to sinusoidal gratings of simple cells in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysioligy 45, 818–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maffei, L., Morrone, C., Pirchio, M. & Sandini, G. (1979). Responses of visual cortical cells to periodic and nonperiodic stimuli. Journal of Physiology 296, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marceija, S. (1980). Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America 70 1297–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movshon, J.A., Thompson, I.D. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1978). Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 283, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. & Vetterling, W.T. (1986). Numerical Recipes: the Art Scientific Computing. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schumer, R.A. & Movshon, J.A. (1984). Length summation in simple cells of cat striate cortex. Vision Research 24, 565–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolhurst, D.J. & Dean, A.F. (1987). Spatial summation by simple cells in the striate cortex of the cat. Experimental Brain Research 66, 607–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolhurst, D.J. & Thompson, I.D. (1981). On the variety of spatial-frequency selectivities shown by neurons is area 17 of the cat. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 213, 183–199.Google ScholarPubMed
Tolhurst, D.J., Movshon, J.A. & Dean, A.F. (1983). The statistical reliability of single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vision Research 23, 775–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolhurst, D.J., Movshon, J.A. & Thompson, I.D. (1981). The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurons on stimulus contrase. Experimental Brian Research, 41, 414–419.Google Scholar