Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:16:07.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dendritic impulse collisions and shifting sites of action potential initiation contract and extend the receptive field of an amacrine cell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2007

AUDREY S. ROYER  and
ROBERT F. MILLER
AUDREY S. ROYER
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
ROBERT F. MILLER
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluated the contributions of somatic and dendritic impulses to the receptive field dimensions of amacrine cells in the amphibian retina. For this analysis, we used the NEURON simulation program with a multicompartmental, multichannel model of an On-Off amacrine cell with a three-dimensional structure obtained through computer tracing techniques. Simulated synaptic inputs were evenly spaced along the dendritic branches and organized into eight annuli of increasing radius. The first set of simulations activated each ring progressively to simulate an area summation experiment, while a second approach activated each annulus individually. Both sets of simulations were done with and without the presence of Na channels in the dendrites and soma. Unexpectedly, the receptive field dimensions observed in the area summation simulations was often smaller than that predicted from the summation of the annular simulations. Collisions of action potentials moving in opposite directions in the dendrites largely accounted for this contraction in receptive field size for the area summation studies. The presence of dendritic Na channels increased the size of the receptive field beyond that achieved in their absence and allowed the physiological size of the receptive field to approximate the physical dimensions of the dendritic tree. This receptive field augmentation was the result of impulse generating ability in the dendrites which enhanced the signal observed at the soma. These simulations provide a plausible mechanistic explanation for physiological recordings from amacrine cells that show similar phenomena.

Keywords

RetinaDendritesSodium channelsSummationComputer model
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , July 2007 , pp. 619 - 634
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloomfield, S.A. (1991). Two types of orientation-sensitive responses of amacrine cells in the mammalian retina. Nature 350, 347–350.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, S.A. (1992). Relationship between receptive and dendritic field size of amacrine cells in the rabbit retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 68, 711–725.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, S.A. (1994). Orientation-sensitive amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 71, 1672–1691.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, S.A. (1996). Effect of spike blockade on the receptive-field size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 75, 1878–1893.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, S.A. & Dacheux, R.F. (2001). Rod vision: Pathways and processing in the mammalian retina. Progress in Retina and Eye Research 20, 351–384.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, S.A. & Xin, D. (2000). Surround inhibition of mammalian AII amacrine cells is generated in the proximal retina. Journal of Physiology 523, 771–783.Google Scholar
Cook, P.B., Lukasiewicz, P.D. & McReynolds, J.S. (1998). Action potentials are required for the lateral transmission of glycinergic transient inhibition in the amphibian retina. Journal of Neuroscience 18, 2301–2308.Google Scholar
Cook, P.B. & Werblin, F.S. (1994). Spike initiation and propagation in wide field transient amacrine cells of the salamander retina. Journal of Neuroscience 14, 3852–3861.Google Scholar
Dacheux, R.F., Chimento, M.F. & Amthor, F.R. (2003). Synaptic input to the on-off directionally selective ganglion cell in the rabbit retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 456, 267–278.Google Scholar
Dacheux, R.F. & Raviola, E. (1986). The rod pathway in the rabbit retina: A depolarizing bipolar and amacrine cell. Journal of Neuroscience 6, 331–345.Google Scholar
Dacheux, R.F. & Raviola, E. (1995). Light responses from one type of ON-OFF amacrine cells in the rabbit retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 74, 2460–2468.Google Scholar
Deng, P., Cuenca, N., Doerr, T., Pow, D.V., Miller, R. & Kolb, H. (2001). Localization of neurotransmitters and calcium binding proteins to neurons of salamander and mudpuppy retinas. Vision Research 41, 1771–1783.Google Scholar
Eliasof, S., Barnes, S. & Werblin, F. (1987). The interaction of ionic currents mediating single spike activity in retinal amacrine cells of the tiger salamander. Journal of Neuroscience 7, 3512–3524.Google Scholar
Fohlmeister, J.F. & Miller, R.F. (1997a). Mechanisms by which cell geometry controls repetitive impulse firing in retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 78, 1948–1964.Google Scholar
Fohlmeister, J.F. & Miller, R.F. (1997b). Impulse encoding mechanisms of ganglion cells in the tiger salamander retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 78, 1935–1947.Google Scholar
Freed, M.A., Pflug, R., Kolb, H. & Nelson, R. (1996). ON-OFF amacrine cells in cat retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 364, 556–566.Google Scholar
Hines, M. (1997). NEURON: A program for simulation of nerve equations. In Neural Systems: Analysis and Modeling, ed. Eeckman, F.H., pp. 127–136. Norwell: Kluwer Academic.
Koizumi, A., Hayashida, Y., Kiuchi, T., Yamada, Y., Fujii, A., Yagi, T. & Kaneko, A. (2005). The interdependence and independence of amacrine cell dendrites: Patch-clamp recordings and simulation studies on cultured GABAergic amacrine cells. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 4, 363–380.Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, P.D. & Werblin, F.S. (1990). The spatial distribution of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to ganglion cell dendrites in the tiger salamander retina. Journal of Neuroscience 10, 210–221.Google Scholar
MacNeil, M.A., Heussy, J.K., Dacheux, R.F., Raviola, E. & Masland, R.H. (1999). The shapes and numbers of amacrine cells: Matching of photofilled with Golgi-stained cells in the rabbit retina and comparison with other mammalian species. Journal of Comparative Neurology 413, 305–326.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F. & Bloomfield, S.A. (1983). Electroanatomy of a unique amacrine cell in the rabbit retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 80, 3069–3073.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F. & Dacheux, R. (1976). Dendritic and somatic spikes in mudpuppy amacrine cells: identification and TTX sensitivity. Brain Research 104, 157–162.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F. & Dacheux, R.F. (1983). Intracellular chloride in retinal neurons: Measurement and meaning. Vision Research 23, 399–411.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F., Dacheux, R.F. & Frumkes, T.E. (1977). Amacrine cells in Necturus retina: Evidence for independent gamma-aminobutyric acid- and glycine-releasing neurons. Science 198, 748–750.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F., Frumkes, T.E., Slaughter, M. & Dacheux, R.F. (1981). Physiological and pharmacological basis of GABA and glycine action on neurons of mudpuppy retina. II. Amacrine and ganglion cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 45, 764–782.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F., Staff, N.P. & Velte, T.J. (2006). Form and function of ON-OFF amacrine cells in the amphibian retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 95, 3171–3190.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. & Kolb, H. (1985). A17: A broad-field amacrine cell in the rod system of the cat retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 54, 592–614.Google Scholar
Rall, W. (1959). Branching dendritic trees and motoneuron membrane resistivity. Experimental Neurology 1, 491–527.Google Scholar
Rall, W. (1964). Theoretical significance of dendritic trees for neuronal input-output relations. In Neural Theory and Modeling, ed. Reiss, R.F., Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rall, W., Burke, R.E., Holmes, W.R., Jack, J.J., Redman, S.J. & Segev, I. (1992). Matching dendritic neuron models to experimental data. Physiological Reviews 72, S159–S186.Google Scholar
Raviola, E. & Dacheux, R.F. (1987). Excitatory dyad synapse in rabbit retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 84, 7324–7328.Google Scholar
Sandell, J.H., Masland, R.H., Raviola, E. & Dacheux, R.F. (1989). Connections of indoleamine-accumulating cells in the rabbit retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 283, 303–313.Google Scholar
Shields, C.R. & Lukasiewicz, P.D. (2003). Spike-dependent GABA inputs to bipolar cell axon terminals contribute to lateral inhibition of retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 89, 2449–2458.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M.M. & Miller, R.F. (1981). 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid: A new pharmacological tool for retina research. Science 211, 182–185.Google Scholar
Strettoi, E., Raviola, E. & Dacheux, R.F. (1992). Synaptic connections of the narrow-field, bistratified rod amacrine cell (AII) in the rabbit retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 325, 152–168.Google Scholar
Volgyi, B., Xin, D., Amarillo, Y. & Bloomfield, S.A. (2001). Morphology and physiology of the polyaxonal amacrine cells in the rabbit retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 440, 109–125.Google Scholar
Yang, C.Y., Lukasiewicz, P., Maguire, G., Werblin, F.S. & Yazulla, S. (1991). Amacrine cells in the tiger salamander retina: morphology, physiology, and neurotransmitter identification. Journal of Comparative Neurology 312, 19–32.Google Scholar