Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:40:25.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in pupil diameter entrained by cortically initiated changes in attention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2012

LORI B. DANIELS ,
DAVID F. NICHOLS ,
MATHEW S. SEIFERT  and
HOWARD S. HOCK
LORI B. DANIELS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida
DAVID F. NICHOLS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Roanoke College, Salem, Virginia
MATHEW S. SEIFERT
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida
HOWARD S. HOCK*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida
*
*Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Howard S. Hock, Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diameter of the pupil is affected by changes in ambient illumination, color, spatial structure, movement, and mental effort. It has now been found that pupil diameter can be affected by cognitive processes. That is, it can be entrained by alternations between broadly spread and narrowly focused attention that are cued exogenously (attention is “summoned” by the cue) or endogenously (attention changes under the perceiver’s intentional control). Pupil diameter also is affected by post-eye-blink constrictions that occur most often when attention is narrowed, and possibly by changes evoked by the near reflex, although changes in attention state parsimoniously account for the entirety of the results. Changes in pupil diameter produce differences in spherical aberration that alternately blur (when the pupil dilates) and sharpen the retinal image (when the pupil constricts), affecting the relative sensitivity of large receptive fields that mediate broadly spread attention compared with smaller receptive fields that mediate more narrowly focused attention. Results for endogenously cued, intentional changes in attentional spread provide definitive behavioral evidence for cortical feedback to subcortical nuclei that control pupil diameter, either directly or through pupil-constricting eye blinks. Analyses of convergent and divergent changes in eye position indicate that the near reflex was activated long after the initiation of relatively gradual attentionally cued changes in pupil diameter, and further, that when it occurs, the near reflex facilitates ongoing changes in pupil diameter.

Keywords

Pupil dynamicsAttentional spreadCortical feedbackSpherical aberration
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 131 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aston-Jones, G. & Cohen, J.D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience 28, 403–450.Google Scholar
Balz, G.W. & Hock, H.S. (1997). The effect of attentional spread on spatial resolution. Vision Research 37, 1499–1510.Google Scholar
Barbur, J.L. (2004). Learning from the pupil - studies of basic mechanisms and clinical applications. In The Visual Neurosciences, ed. Chalupa, M. & Werner, J.S., pp. 641–656. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barbur, J.L. & Forsyth, P.M. (1986). Can the pupil response be used as a measure of visual input associated with the geniculo-striate pathway? Clinical Vision Sciences 1, 107–111.Google Scholar
Beatty, J. (1982). Task evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin 91, 276–292.Google Scholar
Campbell, F.W. & Green, D.G. (1965). Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. The Journal of Physiology 181, 576–593.Google Scholar
Campbell, F.W. & Gubish, R.W. (1966). Optical quality of the human eye. The Journal of Physiology 18, 558–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castiello, U. & Umilta, C. (1990). Size of attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychologica 73, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G.L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 3, 201–215.Google Scholar
Cowey, A., Johnson, H. & Stoerig, P. (2001). The retinal projection to the pregeniculate nucleus in normal and destriate monkeys. European Journal of Neuroscience 13, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowey, A., Stoerig, P. & Perry, V.H. (1989). Transneuronal retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells after damage to striate cortex in macaque monkeys: Selective loss of P beta cells. Neuroscience 29, 65–80.Google Scholar
Ellis, C.J. (1981). The pupillary light reflex in normal subjects. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 65, 754–759.Google Scholar
Erkelens, C.J. & Regan, D. (1986). Human ocular vergence movements induced by changing size and disparity. The Journal of Physiology 379, 145–169.Google Scholar
Gamlin, P.D.R. (2006). The pretectum: Connections and oculomotor-related roles. Progress in Brain Research 151, 379–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamlin, P.D.R., Zhang, H. & Clarke, R.J. (1995). Luminance neurons in the pretectal olivary complex nucleus mediate the pupillary light reflex in the rhesus monkey. Experimental Brain Research 106, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamlin, P.D.R., Zhang, H., Harlow, A. & Barbur, J.L. (1998). Pupil responses to stimulus color, structure and light flux increments in the rhesus monkey. Vision Research 38, 3353–3358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goto, M., Toriu, T. & Tanahashi, J. (2001). Effect of size of attended area on contrast sensitivity function. Vision Research 41, 1483–1487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S.J. & Vrba, E.S. (1982). Exaptation - a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, P.H., Perry, F., Jewett, D.L. & Levine, J.D. (1990). Autonomic components of the human pupillary light reflex. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 31, 156–162.Google Scholar
Hess, E.H. & Polt, J.M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science 132, 349–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heywood, C.A., Nicholas, J.J., Lemare, C. & Cowey, A. (1998). The effects of lesions to cortical areas V4 or AIT on pupillary responses to chromatic and achromatic stimuli in monkeys. Experimental Brain Research 122, 475–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochstein, S. & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36, 791–804.Google Scholar
Hock, H.S. & Balz, G.W. (1994). Spatial scale dependent in-phase and anti-phase directional biases in the perception of self-organized motion patterns. Vision Research 34, 1843–1864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hock, H.S., Balz, G.W. & Smollon, W. (1998). Attentional control of spatial scale and effects on self-organized motion patterns. Vision Research 38, 3743–3758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howarth, P.A., Heron, G. & Whittaker, L. (2000). The measurement of pupil cycling time. Graefe’s Archives of Clinical Experimental Ophthalmology 238, 826–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, D.C. (1982). Statistical Methods for Psychology. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Húpe, J.M., Lamirel, C. & Lorenceau, J. (2009). Pupil dynamics during bistable motion perception. Journal of Vision 9, 1–19.Google Scholar
Ignashchenkova, A., Dicke, P.W., Haarmeier, T. & Their, P. (2004). Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience 7, 56–64.Google Scholar
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In Attention and Performance IX, ed. Long, J.B. & Baddeley, A.D., pp. 187–203. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 154, 1583–1585.Google Scholar
Kardon, R.H. (1998). Anatomy and physiology of the pupil. In Walsh and Hoyt’s Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology (5th ed.), ed. Miller, N.R., pp. 847–897. Philadelphia, PA: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
LaBerge, D., Brown, V., Carter, M., Bash, D. & Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 17, 65–76.Google Scholar
Loewenfeld, I.E. (1999). The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, O. & Loewenfeld, I.E. (1950). Mutual role of sympathetic and parasympathetic in shaping of the pupillary reflex to light: Pupillographic studies. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 64, 341–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDougal, D.H. & Gamlin, P.D.R. (2008). Pupillary control pathways. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference 1, 521–536.Google Scholar
Mihailovic, L.T., Cupic, D. & Dekleva, N. (1971). Changes in the numbers of neurons and glial cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the monkey during retrograde cell degeneration. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 142, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peelen, M.V., Heslenfeld, D.J. & Theeuwes, J. (2004). Endogenous and exogenous attention shifts are mediated by the same large-scale neural network. Neuroimage 22, 822–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierson, R.J. & Carpenter, M.B. (1974). Anatomical analysis of pupillary reflex pathways in the rhesus monkey. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 158, 121–144.Google Scholar
Poggel, D.E., Treutwein, B., Calmanti, C. & Strasburger, H. (2006). Increasing the temporal grain: Double-pulse resolution is affected by the size of the attention focus. Vision Research 46, 2998–3008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, A.C., Rao, S.M., Caffarra, P., Scaglioni, A., Bobholz, J.A., Woodley, S.J., Hammeke, T.A., Cunningham, J.M., Prieto, T.E. & Binder, J.R. (1999). Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11, 135–152.Google Scholar
Sahraie, A. & Barbur, J.L. (1997). Pupil response triggered by the onset of coherent motion. Graefe’s Archives of Clinical Ophthalmology 235, 494–500.Google Scholar
Shipp, S. (2004). The brain circuitry of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slooter, J. & van Norren, D. (1980). Visual acuity measure with pupil responses to checkerboard stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 19, 105–108.Google Scholar
Stark, L., Campbell, F.W. & Atwood, J. (1958). Pupil unrest: An example of noise in a biological servomechanism. Nature 182, 857–858.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, S.R., Siegle, G.J., Condray, R. & Pless, M. (2004). Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology 52, 77–86.Google Scholar
Westheimer, G. & Mitchell, A.M. (1956). Eye movement responses to convergence stimuli. Archives of Ophthalmology 55, 848–856.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, J.M. (1975). The effects of pupil size on grating detection at various contrast levels. Vision Research 15, 645–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, R.S.L. & Alpern, M. (1980). Pupil responses to foveal exchange of monochromatic lights. Journal of the Optical Society of America 70, 697–706.Google Scholar
Young, R.S.L., Han, B.C. & Wu, P.Y. (1993). Transient and sustained components of the pupillary responses evoked by luminance and color. Vision Research 33, 437–446.Google Scholar
Young, R.S.L. & Kennish, J. (1993). Transient and sustained components of the pupillary responses evoked by achromatic spatial patterns. Vision Research 33, 2239–2252.Google Scholar