Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:02:43.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are primate lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) cells really sensitive to orientation or direction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2002

XIANGMIN XU
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
JENNIFER ICHIDA
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
YURI SHOSTAK
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
A.B. BONDS
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
VIVIEN A. CASAGRANDE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville Department of Cell Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

Abstract

There is considerable controversy over the existence of orientation and direction sensitivity in lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) neurons. Claims for the existence of these properties often were based upon data from cells tested well beyond their peak spatial frequencies. The goals of the present study were to examine the degree of orientation and direction sensitivity of LGN cells when tested at their peak spatial and temporal frequencies and to compare the tuning properties of these subcortical neurons with those of visual cortex. For this investigation, we used conventional extracellular recording to study orientation and direction sensitivities of owl monkey LGN cells by stimulating cells with drifting sinusoidal gratings at peak temporal frequencies, peak or higher spatial frequencies, and moderate contrast. A total of 110 LGN cells (32 koniocellular cells, 34 magnocellular cells, and 44 parvocellular cells) with eccentricities ranging from 2.6 deg to 27.5 deg were examined. Using the peak spatial and temporal frequencies for each cell, 41.8% of the LGN cells were found to be sensitive to orientation and 19.1% were direction sensitive. The degree of bias for orientation and direction did not vary with eccentricity or with cell class. Orientation sensitivity did, however, increase, and in some cases orientation preferences changed, at higher spatial frequencies. Increasing spatial frequency had no consistent effect on direction sensitivity. Compared to cortical cell orientation tuning, the prevalence and strength of LGN cell orientation and direction sensitivity are weak. Nevertheless, the high percentage of LGN cells sensitive to orientation even at peak spatial and temporal frequencies reinforces the view that subcortical biases could, in combination with activity-dependent cortical mechanisms and/or cortical inhibitory mechanisms, account for the much narrower orientation and direction tuning seen in visual cortex.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)