Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:34:00.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Apomorphine blocks form-deprivation myopia in chickens by a dopamine D2-receptor mechanism acting in retina or pigmented epithelium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Baerbel Rohrer ,
Arthur W. Spira  and
William K. Stell
Baerbel Rohrer
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Lions’ Sight Center, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Arthur W. Spira
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Lions’ Sight Center, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
William K. Stell
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Lions’ Sight Center, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) in animal models have shown that postnatal ocular growth is regulated by the quality of patterned images on the retina. One of the major challenges in myopia research is to identify the biochemical mechanisms which translate retinal visual responses into signals that regulate scleral growth. Dopamine (DA) has been implicated in this process, since retinal DA levels decline in FDM and subconjunctival injections of apomorphine (Apo, a nonspecific DA agonist) prevent FDM in a dose-dependent way (Stone et al., 1989).

To gain insight into where and how DA ligands act to regulate ocular elongation, we compared the action and distribution of DA receptor ligands injected intravitreally vs. subconjunctivally in young chicks. Ocular length was measured by A-scan ultrasound. We found that daily intravitreal injections of Apo block FDM at a 50% effective dose (ED50) of 5 pg per day, or a peak concentration in the vitreous humor of 108 pM, compared to an ED50 of 2.5 ng for subconjunctival injections as reported by Stone et al. (1989, 1990). [3H]-spiperone, a D2-receptor antagonist, reached average maximum retinal concentrations of 160 pM and 260 pM, during the first hour after intravitreal and subconjunctival administration, respectively, at the ED50 dose. In contrast, the maximum spiperone concentrations in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) were 30 pM and 410 pM, respectively, after intravitreal or subconjunctival ED50 doses. Spiperone concentrations in sclera after ED50 doses to the two sites differed by 4 x 104 (0.4 pM vs. 1.7 nM, respectively). The FDM-preventing action of Apo was blocked completely by simultaneous administration of spiperone but not by SCH 23390 (a D1-receptor antagonist) in 100-fold molar excess.

These results show that apomorphine acts to prevent FDM at an intraocular site, presumably in retina and/or pigment epithelium, but not sclera, whether administered intravitreally or subconjunctivally. A dose yielding a concentration of 100–260 pM, delivered ≤1 h per day, produces half-maximal inhibition. This action is mediated by D2-receptors, for which the dissociation constant for apomorphine is ≤1 nM. The retinal pigment epithelium may act as a trophic relay station, responding to a retinal messenger which may be DA and secreting scleral growth-regulator(s) from its basal surface.

Keywords

Ocular growthApomorphineMyopiaRetinaPigment epitheliumDopamine D2-receptor
Type
Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , May 1993 , pp. 447 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, A. III, & Hastings, A.B. (1956). Studies on water and electrolytes in nervous tissue. I. Rabbit retina: Methods and interpretation of data. Journal of Neurophysiology 19, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, A.M. & Wallman, J. (1989). Increased protein synthesis in scleras of eyes with deprivation myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 30, 402.Google Scholar
Creese, I.I., Sibley, D.R., Hamblin, M.W. & Leef, S.E. (1983). The classification of dopamine receptors: Relationship to radioligand binding. Annual Review of Neuroscience 6, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doan, M.G., Jensen, A.D. & Dohlman, C.H. (1978). Penetration routes of topically applied eye medications. American Journal of Ophthalmology 85, 383–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faktorovich, E.G., Steinberg, R.H., Yasumura, D., Matthes, M.T. & Vail, M.M.La (1990). Photoreceptor degeneration in inherited retinal dystrophy delayed by basic fibroblast growth factor. Nature 347, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollender, M., Thorn, F. & Erickson, P. (1979). Development of axial dimensions following eye lid suture in the cat. Vision Research 19, 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodos, W. & Kuenzel, W.J. (1984). Retinal image degradation produces ocular enlargement in chicks. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 25, 652–659.Google ScholarPubMed
Holden, A.L., Hodos, W., Hayes, B.P. & Fitzke, F.W. (1988). Myopia: Induced, normal and clinical. Eye (Suppl.) 2, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyt, C.S., Stone, R.D., Fromer, C. & Billson, F.A. (1982). Monocular axial myopia associated with eye lid closure in human infants. American Journal of Ophthalmology 91, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D.H. (1988). Eye, Brain, and Vision. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.A., Post, R.B., Chalupa, L.M. & Lee, T.J. (1982). Monocular deprivation in humans: A study of identical twins. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 23, 135–140.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirby, A.W., Sutton, L. & Weiss, H. (1982). Elongation of cat eyes following neonatal lid suture. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 22, 274–277.Google ScholarPubMed
Koh, S-W.M. (1991). VIP stimulation of polarized macromolecule secretion in cultures of chick embryonic retinal pigment epithelium. Experimental Cell Research 197, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, S.G. (1971). Dopamine: A retinal neurotransmitter. I. Retinal uptake, storage, and light-stimulated release of [3H]-dopamine in vivo. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 10, 438–452.Google ScholarPubMed
Lin, T., Grimes, P.A., Stone, R.A. & Laties, A.M. (1992). Can transchoroidal diffusion account for retinal control of scleral growth? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 33, 813.Google Scholar
Mcbrien, N.A., Moghaddan, H.O., Reeder, A.P. & Moules, S. (1991). Structural and biochemical changes in the sclera of experimentally myopic eyes. Biochemical Society Transactions 19, 861–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mckanna, J.A. & Casagrande, V.A. (1978). Reduced lens development in lid-suture myopia. Experimental Eye Research 26, 715–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nickla, D., Panos, S., Fugate-Wentzek, L., Gottlieb, M. & Wallman, J. (1989). What attributes of visual stimulation determine whether chick eyes develop deprivation myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 30, 31.Google Scholar
Norton, T.T. (1990). Experimental myopia in tree shrew. In 1990 Myopia and the Control of Eye Growth, ed. Wallman, J., Vol. 155, pp. 178–199. Wiley, Chichester: Ciba Foundation Symposium.Google Scholar
Nowak, J.Z. & Zurawska, E. (1989). Dopamine in the rabbit retina and striatum: Diurnal rhythm and effect of light stimulation. Journal of Neural Transmission 75, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Leary, D.J. & Millodot, M. (1979). Eyelid closure causes myopia in humans. Experiment/a 35, 1478–1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peroutka, S.J.U, ’ Prichard, D.C., Greenberg, D.A. & Snyder, S.H. (1977). Neuroleptic drug interactions with norepinephrine alpha receptor binding sites in rat brain. Neuropharmacology 16, 549–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quik, M., Iversen, L.L., Larder, A. & Mackay, A.V.P. (1978). Use of ADTN to define specific [3H]-spiperone binding to receptors in brain. Nature 274, 513–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quik, M. & Iversen, L.L. (1979). Regional study of [3H]-spiperone binding and the dopamine sensitive adenylate cyclase in the rat brain. European Journal of Pharmacology 56, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rada, J.A., Thoft, R.A., Hassell, J.R. (1991). Increased aggrecan (cartilage proteoglycan) production in the sclera of myopic chick. Developmental Biology 147, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, P., Watanabe, M., Grigorladis, D., Tedesco, J.L., George, S.R., Sevensson, U., Nilsson, J.L.G. & Neumeyer, J.L. (1985). Dopamine D2-receptor binding sites for agonists–a tetrahedral model. Molecular Pharmacology 28, 391–399.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, E.L., Harwerth, T.N., Crawford, M.L.J. & Von Noorden, G.K. (1987). Observations on the effects of form deprivation on the refractive status of the monkey. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 28, 1236–1245.Google ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, R. (1986). Research update: Report from a workshop on cell biology of retinal detachment. Experimental Eye Research 43, 695–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, R.A., Lin, T., Laties, A.M. & Iuvone, P.M. (1989). Retinal dopamine and form deprivation myopia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 86, 704–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, R.A., Lin, T., Iuvone, P.M. & Laties, A.M. (1990). Postnatal control of ocular growth: Dopaminergic mechanisms. In 1990 Myopia and the Control of Eye Growth, ed. Wallman, J., Vol. 155, pp. 45–62. Wiley, Chichester: Ciba Foundation Symposium.Google Scholar
Tripathi, B.J., Borisuth, N.S.C. & Tripathi, R.C. (1992). Concentrations of growth factors in primary and secondary aqueous humors. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 33, 1180.Google Scholar
Troilo, D., Judge, S.J., Ridley, R. & Baker, H. (1990). Myopia induced in a new world primate the common marmoset (Callythrix jacchus). Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 31, 254.Google Scholar
Ventura, A.L.M., Klein, W.L. & Demello, F.G. (1984). Differential ontogenesis of D1 and D2 dopaminergic receptors in the chick embryo retina. Brain Research 314, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vingrys, A.J., Squires, M.A., Napper, G.A., Barrington, M., Ves-Sey, G.A. & Brennan, N.A. (1991). Prevention of form deprivation myopia in post-hatch chickens. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 32, 1203.Google Scholar
Wagner, H.-J., Luo, B.-G., Stell, W.K., Ariano, M.A. & Sibley, D.R. (1992). Localization of D2 dopamine receptors in vertebrate retinae with antipeptide antibodies. Journal of Comparative Neurology (in press).Google Scholar
Wallman, J., Turkel, J. & Trachtman, J. (1978). Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. Science (Washington, D.C.) 201, 1249–1251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallman, J., Gottlieb, M.D., Rajaram, V. & Fugate-Wentzek, L. (1987). Local retinal regions control local eye growth and myopia. Science 237, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallman, J., Xu, A., Wildsoet, C., Krebs, W., Gottlieb, M., Marran, L. & Nickla, D. (1992). Moving the retina: A third mechanism of focusing the eye. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 33, 1053.Google Scholar
Yinon, U., Rose, L. & Shapiro, A. (1980). Myopia in the eye of developing chicks following monocular and binocular lid closure. Vision Research 20, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed