Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:37:26.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WHOSE FAULT? THE SPECULATOR'S GUILT IN LITTLE DORRIT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

Colleen Lannon
Colleen Lannon*
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In May 1855, Charles Dickens confided to a friend that he had found a “capital name” for his new work, Nobody's Fault, a title that remained until he completed the first three numbers and renamed it Little Dorrit (Letters 7.703). The original title has generally been assumed to refer to Dickens's broad attack on the lack of accountability in government, particularly in relation to the Crimean War. However, the phrase also evokes the issues of financial impropriety that permeate the novel. In particular, Arthur's obsessive concern that through his parents’ grasping at money “some one may have been grievously deceived, injured, ruined” (39; bk. 1, ch. 5) links his personal sense of guilt to the more public instance of financial “ruin” in the book – the collapse of Mr. Merdle's fraudulent schemes. In both cases, the question of agency remains ambiguous. Who is at fault for the bankruptcy of Clennam & Doyce: Arthur, who invested the firm's money in Merdle's ventures; Pancks, who convinced him of their soundness; or Merdle, who perpetrated the fraud? And who bears responsibility for the financial deceit that deprived Amy Dorrit of her rightful inheritance from Arthur's grandfather: Mrs. Clennam, who hid the codicil; Arthur's father, who colluded in the concealment; or Arthur, who, along with his parents, benefited financially from the transaction? Out of these ambiguities emerges one figure that becomes the locus of responsibility and blame for both transgressions – Arthur Clennam. Against the express wishes of his solicitor, Arthur steps forward to become the “solitary target” for the “thousands of people. . . wildly staring about for somebody alive to heap reproaches on” in the aftermath of Merdle's downfall and suicide (599; bk. 2, ch. 26). His actions give public expression to his private sense of familial guilt, allowing him to declare openly, “I am at fault.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 413 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Arnold, A. J., and McCartney, S.. George Hudson: The Rise and Fall of the Railway King. London and New York: Hambledon and London, 2004.Google Scholar
Brown, James M. Dickens: Novelist in the Market-Place. Totowa: Barnes & Noble, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, John E. “The Topicality of Little Dorrit .” University of Toronto Quarterly 29 (1959): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, John, and Tillotson, Kathleen. “From ‘Nobody's Fault’ to Little Dorrit .” Dickens at Work. London: Methuen, 1957. 222–33.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Charles Dickens: Selected Journalism, 1850–1870. London: Penguin, 1997: 482–85.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Dombey and Son.1848. Ed. Fairclough, Peter. London, New York: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Letters of Charles Dickens. Ed. House, Madeline, Storey, Graham, Tillotson, Kathleen. 11 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Little Dorrit. 1855–57. Ed. Sucksmith, Peter. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “Nobody, Somebody, and Everybody.” Household Words Aug. 30, 1856.Google Scholar
Dvorak, Wilfred P. “The Misunderstood Pancks: Money and the Rhetoric of Disguise in Little Dorrit .” Studies in the Novel 23.3 (Fall 1991): 339–47.Google Scholar
Evans, D. Morier. Facts, Failures, Frauds: Revelations Financial, Mercantile, Criminal. 1859. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1968.Google Scholar
Feltes, N. N. “Community and the Limits of Liability in two Mid-Victorian Novels.” Victorian Studies 17 (1974): 355–69.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. Jeffrey. Serious Play: The Cultural Form of the Nineteenth-Century Realist Novel. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Nancy. “‘Ladies do it?’ Victorian Women Investors in Fact and Fiction.” Victorian Literature and Finance. Ed. O'Gorman, Francis. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Nancy. “‘Rushing into Eternity’: Suicide and Finance in Victorian Fiction.” Victorian Investments. Ed. Henry, Nancy and Schmitt, Cannon. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2009. 161–81.Google Scholar
Herbert, Christopher. “Filthy Lucre: Victorian Ideas of Money.” Victorian Studies 44.2 (Winter 2002): 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzkowitz, David. “Fair Enterprise or Extravagant Speculation: Investment, Speculation, and Gambling in Victorian England.” Victorian Studies 45.1 (Autumn 2002): 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Audrey. The Affective Life of the Average Man. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Justman, Stewart. “Direct and Indirect Guilt in Little Dorrit .” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 85.1 (Spring–Summer 2002): 39–52.Google Scholar
Klaver, Claudia. “Natural Values and Unnatural Agents: Little Dorrit and the Mid-Victorian Crisis in Agency.” Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction 28 (1999): 13–43.Google Scholar
Kornbluh, Anna. Realizing Capital: Financial and Psychic Economies in Victorian Form. New York: Fordham UP, 2014.Google Scholar
Lambert, Richard S. The Railway King. 1934. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1964.Google Scholar
Lewin, Henry Grote. The Railway Mania and its Aftermath: 1845–1852. 1936. New York: Augustus M. Kelly, 1968.Google Scholar
Loftus, Donna. “Limited Liability, Market Democracy, and the Social Organization of Production in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Victorian Investments. Ed. Henry, Nancy and Schmitt, Cannon. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2009. 79–97.Google Scholar
Lund, Roger D. “Genteel Fictions: Character and Satirical Design in Little Dorrit .” Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction 10 (1982): 45–66.Google Scholar
Manning, Sylvia Bank. “Social Criticism and Textual Subversion in Little Dorrit .” Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction 20 (1991): 127–47.Google Scholar
McGann, Tara. “Literary Realism in the Wake of Business Cycle Theory: The Way We Live Now (1875).” Victorian Literature and Finance. Ed. O'Gorman, Francis. Oxford: Oxford UP: 2007. 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, Daniel. “If Re-Collecting were Forgetting: Forged Bodies and Forgotten Labor in Little Dorrit .” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 31.1 (1997): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunokawa, Jeff. The Afterlife of Property: Domestic Security and the Victorian Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Gorman, Francis. “Introduction.” Victorian Literature and Finance. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. “Writing about Finance in Victorian England: Disclosure and Secrecy in the Culture of Investment.” Victorian Studies 45.1 (Autumn 2002): 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reith, Gerda. The Age of Chance: Gambling in Western Culture. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Robb, George. “Ladies of the Ticker: Women, Investment, and Fraud in England and America, 1850–1930.” Victorian Investments. Ed. Henry, Nancy and Schmitt, Cannon. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2009. 120–42.Google Scholar
Robb, George. White-Collar Crime in Modern England: Financial Fraud and Business Morality, 1845–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutterford, Janette, and Maltby, Josephine. “‘The Widow, the Clergyman and the Reckless’ – Women Investors before 1914.” Feminist Economics 12.1/2 (2006): 111–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. “Guilt, Authority, and the Shadows of Little Dorrit .” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 34.1 (1979): 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Grahame. Dickens, Money, and Society. Berkeley: U of California P, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, James. Creating Capitalism: Joint-Stock Enterprise in British Politics and Culture 1800–1870. Suffolk, UK: Boydell, 2006.Google Scholar
Wagner, Tamara. Financial Speculation in Victorian Fiction: Plotting Money and the Novel Genre, 1815–1901. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Weiss, Barbara. The Hell of the English: Bankruptcy and the Victorian Novel. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Weiss, Barbara. “Secret Pockets and Secret Breasts: Little Dorrit and the Commercial Scandals of the Fifties.” Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction 10 (1982): 67–76.Google Scholar
Withers, Hartley. “How to Invest.” Contemporary Review 72 (July 1897): 126–32.Google Scholar