Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:10:32.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

These Newcomes: William Makepeace Thackeray and Novelistic Particularity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2021

Timothy Gao Open the ORCID record for Timothy Gao [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through a sustained close reading of William Makepeace Thackeray's 1855 novel The Newcomes, this essay examines three analogous types of particularity in the novel: the particularity of loved ones in the social network, of fictional persons in the literary work, and of the individual text. Drawing on recent sociological and network readings of Victorian narrative, I argue that Thackeray's plot about relationships in the marriage market is reflected (on the level of form) by the structural relation between characters and text, and (on the level of the reading experience) by the affective engagement of the reader to the novel. As characters encounter problems in replacing old relations (former lovers, deceased spouses, estranged relatives) with new ones, the novel raises analogous questions about the replaceability of characters as textual constructs or fictional persons, and of the novel itself as one experience among multitudes on offer in the nineteenth-century market. A tension between the continual or particular experience of an individual novel and the felt historical pressure of novels en masse registers in the text itself as a formal and narrative problem, one that leads us suggestively toward recent methodological debates about intimate and distant reading.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , Fall 2021 , pp. 457 - 480
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Allingham, William. “Visits to Aldsworth.” In Tennyson: Interviews and Recollections, edited by Page, Norman, 130–54. London: MacMillan, 1983.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Rustle of Language. Translated by Richard Howard. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. Chesterton on Dickens. Vol. 15 of The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton. Edited by Alzina, Stone Dale. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria. Edited by J. Shawcross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1907.Google Scholar
Collins, Philip, ed. Thackeray: Interviews and Recollections. London: MacMillan, 1989.Google Scholar
Dames, Nicholas. The Physiology of the Novel: Reading, Neural Science, and the Form of Victorian Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dames, Nicholas. “William Makepeace Thackeray.” In The Cambridge Companion to English Novelists, edited by Poole, Adrian, 149–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita. Uses of Literature. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Frow, John. Character and Person. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “George Eliot: Immanent Victorian.” Representations 90, no. 1 (2005): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. The Letters of Mrs Gaskell. Edited by J. A. V. Chapple and Arthur Pollard. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Hughes, Linda K., and Lund, Michael. “Studying Victorian Serials.” Literary Research 2, no. 4 (1986): 235–52.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Art of Criticism: Henry James on the Theory and the Practice of Fiction. Edited by William Veeder and Susan M. Griffin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
James, Henry. “Henry James, ‘Daniel Deronda: A Conversation.’” In George Eliot: The Critical Heritage, edited by Carroll, David, 417–33. London: Routledge, 1971.Google Scholar
James, Henry. Theory of Fiction: Henry James. Edited by James Edwin Miller. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1972.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Tragic Muse. London: MacMillan, 1921.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. The Great Tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad. New York: George W. Stewart, 1950.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Levine, George. The Realistic Imagination: English Fiction from Frankenstein to Lady Chatterley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre Shauna. Loving Literature: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMaster, Juliet. “Theme and Form in The Newcomes.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 23, no. 2 (1968): 177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWeeny, Gage. The Comfort of Strangers: Social Life and Literary Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
“The Newcomes.” Athenaeum. August 4, 1855.Google Scholar
Plotz, John. “Serial Pleasures: The Influence of Television on the Victorian Novel.” Romanticism on the Net, no. 63 (2014), http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1025619ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Works of John Ruskin. Edited by Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander. London: George Allen, 1908.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. The Newcomes: Memoirs of a Most Respectable Family. Edited by Sanders, Andrew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. “Proposals for a Continuation of Ivanhoe.” Fraser's Magazine for Town and Country 34, no. 200 (August 1846): 237–45.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. Roundabout Papers. London: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1914.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. Vanity Fair. Edited by Small, Helen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillotson, Geoffrey. Thackeray the Novelist. London: Methuen, 1954.Google Scholar
Woloch, Alex. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Zygmunt, Lawrence Charles. “Thackeray and the Picaresque World.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 2012.Google Scholar