Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:15:56.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SINCERITY AND REFLEXIVE SATIRE IN ANTHONY TROLLOPE’S THE STRUGGLES OF BROWN, JONES AND ROBINSON

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2015

Matthew Titolo
Matthew Titolo*
Affiliation:
West Virginia University College of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite the recent revival of interest in the works of Anthony Trollope, his short novel The Struggles of Brown, Jones and Robinson has largely escaped serious attention. Trollope called the book a “satire on the ways of trade,” (Autobiography 106) and serialized it in Cornhill Magazine, 1861–62. The novel turned out to be a critical and commercial failure, perhaps because it marked a dramatic departure from the familiar social comedy of Barsetshire novels. Contemporary reviewers called it “coarse,” “odiously vulgar,” and “unmitigated rubbish.” Later readers were no more generous. C. P. Snow judged SBJR “one of the least funny books ever written” and thought Trollope had “perpetrated idiocy. . .” by writing it (95–96).

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 23 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Anderson, Amanda. “Trollope's Modernity.” English Literary History 74.3 (2007): 509–34.Google Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. The Way We Argue Now. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. Past and Present. New York: New York UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G.On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Anna Maria. Problem Novels: Victorian Fiction Theorizes the Sensational Self. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2007.Google Scholar
Letwin, Shirley Robin. The Gentleman in Trollope. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Walter. The Novel-Machine: The Theory and Fiction of Anthony Trollope. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Kincaid, James. The Novels of Anthony Trollope. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1977.Google Scholar
Kucich, John. “Transgression in Trollope: Dishonesty and the Antibourgeois Elite.” English Literary History 56.3 (1989): 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Andrew. Novels Behind Glass: Commodity Culture and Victorian Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Polhemus, Robert M.The Changing World of Anthony Trollope. Berkeley: U of California P, 1968.Google Scholar
Reed, John R.Victorian Conventions. Athens: Ohio UP, 1975.Google Scholar
Slakey, Roger. “Trollope's Case for Moral Imperative.” Nineteenth Century Fiction 28.3 (1973): 305–20.Google Scholar
Smalley, Anthony, ed. The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge, 1969.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P.Trollope: His Life and Art. New York: Scribner, 1977.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel. Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. An Autobiography. New York: Penguin Classics, 1996.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. Doctor Thorne. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. The New Zealander. Hall, N. John, ed. London: Oxford UP, 1972.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. The Struggles of Brown, Jones and Robinson. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992.Google Scholar