Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:15:25.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“NEUTRAL PHYSIOGNOMY”: THE UNREADABLE FACES OF MIDDLEMARCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

Josh Epstein
Josh Epstein*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mr. Brooke himself has already been described by the narrator as having a “neutral physiognomy,” and that neutrality itself identified as one of few “striking points in his appearance” (503). Part of the effigy's menace, clearly, is its uncanny similarity to the original. As described, however, the effigy is unlikely to be a piece of skilled imitative craftsmanship; indeed, it is the very shoddiness of the thing that makes it eerie. Unlike the banality and apparent harmlessness of this vaguely empty caricature, a rag-doll in waistcoat and monocle, the “parrot-like, Punch-voiced echo of [Mr. Brooke's] words” threatens because it offers no legible meaning, instead forcing interpretive agency onto the reader. Indeed, the “neutral physiognomy” must foreground interpretive agency, otherwise it would be impossible for a non-trait such as neutrality, either in Brooke or in his effigy, to be a “striking point” at all.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 131 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berland, K. J. H. “Reading Character in the Face: Lavater, Socrates, and Physiognomy.” Word and Image 9.3 (1993): 252–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882. Ed. Barlow, Nora. London: Harcourt, 1958.Google Scholar
Deresiewicz, William. “Heroism and Organicism in the Case of Lydgate.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 38.4 (1998): 723–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Living On.” Trans. James Hulbert. Deconstruction and Criticism. New York: Seabury, 1979. 75–176.Google Scholar
Dever, Carolyn. Death and the Mother from Dickens to Freud. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easley, Alexis. “Authorship, Gender, and Identity: George Eliot in the 1850s.” Women's Writing: The Elizabethan to the Victorian Period 3.2 (1996): 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elam, Diane. Feminism and Deconstruction: Ms. en Abyme. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Daniel Deronda. 1876. London: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch. 1872. London: Penguin, 1994.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra, and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Imagination. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Michal Peled. “Pseudonym, Epigraphs, and Narrative Voice: Middlemarch and the Problem of Authorship.” ELH 47.3 (1980): 542–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, John. “Lavater's Physiognomy in England.” Journal of the History of Ideas 22.4 (1961): 561–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, Lucy. Physiognomy and the Meaning of Expression in Nineteenth-Century Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Hertz, Neil. George Eliot's Pulse. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. “This Sex Which Is Not One.” Trans. Claudia Reeder. New French Feminisms: An Anthology. Ed. Marks, Elaine and Courtivron, Isabelle de. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1980. 99–110.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. To Speak Is Never Neutral. 1985. Trans. Gail Schwab. New York: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Patricia E. “The Gendered Politics of the Gaze: Henry James and George Eliot.” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature 30.1 (1997): 39–54.Google Scholar
Lavater, Johann Caspar. Essays on Physiognomy; for the Promotion of the Knowledge and the Love of Mankind. 1789. Trans. Thomas Holcroft. Boston, 1794. Early American Imprints, Series I: Evans. Vanderbilt U., Nashville. 10 May 2005<http://infoweb.newsbank.com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/>..>Google Scholar
Lavater, Johann Caspar. Essays on Physiognomy. 4th ed. London, 1844. Digital Lavater. Ed. Ross Woodrow. U. of Newcastle. 2002. 12 May 2005<http://www.newcastle.edu.au/discipline/fine-art/pubs/lavater>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Logan, Peter M.“Conceiving the Body in Middlemarch.” History of the Human Sciences 4.2 (1991): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Michael York. “Middlemarch and Science: Problems of Life and Mind.” The Review of English Studies 22.86 (1971): 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, Richard. “Fiction as Vivisection: G. H. Lewes and George Eliot.” ELH 67.2 (2000): 617–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “Narrative and History.” ELH 41.3 (1974): 455–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “Optic and Semiotic in Middlemarch.” The Worlds of Victorian Fiction. Ed. Buckley, Jerome H.. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1975. 125–48.Google Scholar
Nardo, Anna K. George Eliot's Dialogue with John Milton. Columbia: U of Missouri P, 2003.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Postlethwaite, Diana. “When George Eliot Reads Milton: The Muse in a Different Voice.” ELH 57.1 (1990): 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rischin, Abigail S.“Beside the Reclining Statue: Ekphrasis, Narrative, and Desire in Middlemarch.” PMLA 111 (1996): 1121–32.Google Scholar
Rivers, Christopher. Face Value: Physiognomical Thought and the Legible Body in Marivaux, Lavater, Balzac, Gautier, and Zola. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1994Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works of Shakespeare. Ed. Bevington, David. 4th ed. New York: Harper Collins, 1992.Google Scholar
Shookman, Ellis. “Pseudo-Science, Social Fad, Literary Wonder: Johann Caspar Lavater and the Art of Physiognomy.” The Faces of Physiognomy: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Johann Caspar Lavater. Ed. Shookman, . Columbia: Camden House, 1993. 1–24.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, Sally. George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Science: The Make-Believe of a Beginning. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Tytler, Graeme. “‘The Lines and Lights of the Human Countenance’: Physiognomy in George Eliot's Fiction.” George Eliot-George Henry Lewes Studies 36–37 (1999): 29–58.Google Scholar
Tytler, Graeme. Physiognomy in the European Novel: Faces and Fortunes. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. R. “From Bumps to Morals: The Phrenological Background to George Eliot's Moral Framework.” Review of English Studies 33.129 (1982): 34–46.Google Scholar