Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:31:40.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NARRATING INSANITY IN THE LETTERS OF THOMAS MULOCK AND DINAH MULOCK CRAIK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2010

Karen Bourrier
Karen Bourrier*
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scholars have had a difficult time assessing the significance of Dinah Mulock Craik (1824–1887), best remembered as the author of John Halifax, Gentleman (1856). The critical verdict on her life and letters has swung toward extremes. Some critics have seen her, to quote Henry James, as “kindly, somewhat dull, pious, and very sentimental” (172); her novels embody the Victorian values of self-help, moral earnestness, and hard work, and it is assumed that her life did too. Elaine Showalter's and Sally Mitchell's feminist recoveries of Craik's work in the 1970s and early 1980s found that just the opposite was true, and that Victorian sentimentality allowed Craik to voice the subversive desires of her female readers covertly, in a form that was acceptable to the general public (Showalter 5–7, Mitchell 31). This critical tradition tended to overemphasize the melodramatic aspects of Craik's life and career as a means of dramatizing the struggles of women in a patriarchal society. The most recent scholarship eschews Craik's life altogether for the most part, focusing on her novelistic representations of disability, of Irish and Scottish nationality, and of class and enfranchisement. This criticism engages Craik's writing as an interesting cultural artifact rather than as an aesthetic object: her work is once again seen as embodying normative Victorian values, but to what extent the author was the cognizant promoter of these values, and to what extent she was their unwitting filter, and whether it matters, is unclear. But new archival work shows the importance of her life in understanding her career. The Mulock Family Papers, held at the University of California at Los Angeles, underscore Craik's challenges in managing an abusive father, who suffered from periods of dejection followed by periods of great happiness, and who was frequently absent and incarcerated. Craik was intensely private when it came to her personal life, and scholars like Showalter have read her reserve as a bow to womanly decorum in a life otherwise dominated by literary celebrity. But the archive suggests that Craik's taciturnity was instead a strategy for managing the threat of violence and scandal.

Type
Work in Progress
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 203 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Auer, Christian. “Un étrange étranger. L'Irlandais Thomas Mulock, journaliste radical dans les Hautes Terres d'Ecosse, 1849–1851.” Études ecossaises 11 (2008): 227–38.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Peter. The Poor Law of Lunacy: The Administration of Pauper Lunatics in mid-Nineteenth-Century England. Washington: Leicester UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Craik, Dinah Mulock. John Halifax, Gentleman. Ed. Alexander, Lynne M.. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Craik, Dinah Mulock. Letters to Ben Mulock. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Craik, Dinah Mulock. Letter to Mary Reade. 14 December c. 1860. M.L. Parrish Collection of Victorian Novelists, Princeton University Library, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Craik, Dinah Mulock. Letter to Alexander Pilkington. 21 January 1886. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Craik, Dinah Mulock, and Mulock, Thomas. Commonplace Book. Dinah Mulock Craik Collection, Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Letter to François Albert Durade. The George Eliot Letters. Ed. Haight, Gordon S.. 9 vols. New Haven: Yale UP, 1954–78.Google Scholar
Forgue, E. D. “Le Roman de femme en Angleterre.” Revue des deux mondes 25 (1860): 797–831.Google Scholar
Fulford, Major. Letter to Dinah Mulock Craik. 6 April 1856. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Holmes, Martha Stoddard. Fictions of Affliction. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Henry. “A Noble Life.” Notes and Reviews. Cambridge: Dunster House: 1921.Google Scholar
Klages, Mary. Woeful Afflictions: Disability and Sentimentality in Victorian America. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1999.Google Scholar
McCandless, Peter. “Liberty and Lunacy: The Victorians and Wrongful Confinement.” Journal of Social History 11.3 (Spring 1978): 366–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, Sally. Dinah Mulock Craik. Boston: Twayne, 1983.Google Scholar
Mulock, Benjamin Robert. Letters to Dinah Mulock Craik. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mulock, Dinah Mellard. Letters to Mrs. Robert Mulock. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mulock, Eliza. Letters to Dinah Mulock Craik. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mulock, Thomas. Letters to Dinah Mulock Craik. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mulock, Thomas Letters to Eliza Mulock. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mulock, Thomas. Letter to Major Fulford. 30 March 1856. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mulock, Thomas. Letters to Mr. and Mrs. Robert Mulock. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Obituary for Thomas Mulock. Mulock Family Papers, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. “Mrs. Craik.” Macmillan's Magazine 57 (1887): 81–85.Google Scholar
Reade, Alleyn Lyell. “The Author of ‘John Halifax, Gentleman.’” Notes and Queries (9 June 1951): 258.Google Scholar
Reade, Alleyn Lyell. “Dinah Mulock and her Father.” Notes and Queries (2 Feb. 1924): 78–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, Alleyn Lyell. The Mellards & their Descendants, Including the Bibbys of Liverpool, with Memoirs of Dinah Maria Mulock & Thomas Mellard Reade. London: Privately printed for the author at the Arden Press, 1915.Google Scholar
Reade, Alleyn Lyell. “Thomas Samuel Mulock, 1789–1869.” Notes and Queries (20 and 22 June 1901): 482–84 and 501–03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Juliet. “The Races of Women: Gender, Hybridity, and National Identity in Dinah Craik's Olive.” Studies in the Novel 39.3 (2007): 284–300.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. “Dinah Mulock Craik and the Tactics of Sentiment.” Feminist Studies 2 (1975): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, David. “Getting Out of the Asylum: Understanding the Confinement of the Insane in the Nineteenth Century.” Social History of Medicine 10.1 (April 1997): 137–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed