No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Myth, Exorcism, and Maggie Tulliver
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Extract
Pater speaks here for a perception shared, differently, by George Eliot and Matthew Arnold. Deep respect for Greek learning as the font of humanism led Arnold to suspect that myth held more truth than did mere philosophy. As if in agreement, Eliot's novel, The Mill on the Floss, asks what that more might be. Is myth a religious expression? an illustration of fate? a model of nature? or of some irreducible essence within the grain and texture of reality eluding definition? All may apply. The gross sum of rural life in the novel, a “grovelling existence which even calamity does not elevate” (238; bk. 4, ch. 1), nevertheless possesses an obscure power that Eliot both dignifies and parodies through sustained allusions to the Ariadne myth. In addition and more particularly, Ariadne expresses Maggie Tulliver's otherwise mute impulses and suppressed motives, the same function it performs for Eliot's later heroines in conflict. This evidence of the myth's extended hold on Eliot's imagination strongly suggests that it spoke for personal as well as fictional experience. Here in her bildungsroman, myth begins to provide her with a vocabulary to express antagonism between nature and culture – to put this roughly – or between passion and idea that Eliot herself confronted and returned to time and again in her novels.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988
References
WORKS CITED
Auerbach, Nina. “The Power of Hunger: Demonism and Maggie Tulliver.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 30.2 (1975): 150–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry-Hillman, Patricia. “Virginities of Image.” Images of the Untouched. Ed. Stroud, Joanne and Thomas, Gail. Dallas: The Dallas Institute of Humanities and Culture, Spring Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, Felicia. The Triptych and The Cross: The Central Myths of George Eliot's Poetic Imagination. New York: New York UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Essays of George Eliot. Ed. Pinney, Thomas. New York: Columbia UP, 1963.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. The George Eliot Letters. Ed. Haight, Gordon S.. 6 vols. New Haven: Yale UP, 1954–1955.Google Scholar
Haight, Gordon S. Introduction. The Mill on the Floss. Boston: Riverside-Houghton Mifflin, 1961.Google Scholar
Heilbrun, Carolyn. Toward a Recognition of Androgyny. 1973. New York: W.W. Norton, 1982.Google Scholar
Joseph, Gerhard. “The Antigone as Cultural Touchstone: Matthew Arnold, Hegel, George Eliot, Virginia Woolf, Margaret Drabble.” PMLA 96 (1981): 22–35.Google Scholar
Knoepflmacher, U.C.Laughter and Despair: Readings in Ten Novels of the Victorian Era. Berkeley: U of California P, 1971.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. The Disappearance of God: Five Nineteenth-Century Writers. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1963.Google Scholar
Moers, Ellen. Literary Women, The Great Writers. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1976.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter. The Renaissance, Studies in Art and Poetry, The 1893 Text. Ed. Hill, Donald L.. Berkeley: U of California P, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesenfarth, Joseph. “The Greeks, The Germans, and George Eliot.” Browning Institute Studies 10 (1982): 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar