Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:28:42.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MIND AND MATTER IN THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2013

Michael Davis
Michael Davis*
Affiliation:
University of the West of England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In chapter 8 of Dorian Gray, Dorian reflects on the terrifying discovery, which he has made the previous night, that the painting has been somehow altered to express his own moral state. He speculates thus on a possible explanation for the change in the picture:

Was there some subtle affinity between the chemical atoms, that shaped themselves into form and colour on the canvas, and the soul that was within him? Could it be that what that soul thought, they realized? – that what it dreamed, they made true? (Wilde 93)

At the end of the chapter, he thinks along similar lines:

Might there not be some curious scientific reason for it all? If thought could exercise its influence upon a living organism, might not thought exercise an influence upon dead and inorganic things? Nay, without thought or conscious desire, might not things external to ourselves vibrate in unison with our moods and passions, atom calling to atom in secret love or strange affinity? (103)

Wilde's references to “atoms” encapsulate something of the complexity and paradox which characterise the novel's representations of the mind and its connection with the body. Atoms make up the painting and Dorian's own body, and this reminder of the materiality of both reminds us, in turn, of the possibility that Dorian, and all human selves, may occupy an insignificant yet inescapable place in the wider processes of the physical world. Most pervasively in the novel, and in the fin de siècle more generally, anxieties about one such material process – that of evolution, and especially of degeneration – haunt representations of the self. In Dorian's thoughts about “atoms” lies the still more extreme possibility that the very distinction between organic and inorganic may be blurred, a vertiginous sense that human evolutionary kinship extends beyond even the simplest organisms to matter itself, and that the category of the human is thus under greater threat than ever in the light of scientific theories of the material world. At the same time, the questions that Dorian asks himself envisage not the reduction of the mind to matter but the near-opposite of this: the possibility that “thought” may somehow “influence” the matter of the painting. In a fantastical version of the Hegelian idealism which forms an important part of Wilde's philosophical position, the mind may prove to be the ultimate reality, independent of and dominant over matter, as the state of Dorian's mind is mysteriously given sensuous form in the transformations which the painting undergoes. The atoms of the painting, like the human mind, take on an ambiguous relationship to the material world. The atoms are not fixed but fluid; like the mind itself, they are material and yet seem to act in ways contrary to physical laws of cause and effect, always in process and resistant to external comprehension.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 547 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Arata, Stephen. Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin de Siècle. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausson, Nils. ‘“Culture and Corruption’: Paterian Self-Development versus Gothic Degeneration in Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Papers on Language and Literature 39.4 (2003): 339–64. Literature Online. Web. 13 July 2010.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. “Body and Mind.” Stephen and Pollock 2: 31–70.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K.. “On the Nature of Things-in-Themselves.” Stephen and Pollock 2: 71–88.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K.. “On the Scientific Basis of Morals.” Stephen and Pollock 2: 106–23.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K.. “The Philosophy of the Pure Sciences.” Stephen and Pollock 1: 254–340.Google Scholar
Cohn, Elisha. “‘One single ivory cell’: Oscar Wilde and the Brain.” Journal of Victorian Culture 17.2: 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Michael. ‘“Incongruous Compounds’: Re-Reading Jekyll and Hyde and Late-Victorian Psychology.” Journal of Victorian Culture 11.2 (2006): 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, Bruce. “Wilde”s ‘Decadence’ and the Positivist Tradition.” Victorian Studies 28.2 (1985): 215–29.Google Scholar
Hasseler, Terri A. “The Physiological Determinism Debate in Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Victorian Newsletter 84 (1993): 31–35.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. “On the Physical Basis of Life.” 1868. Methods and Results. London: Macmillan, 1912. 130–65.Google Scholar
James, William. “Are We Automata?” Mind 4 (1879): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. “On Some Omissions of Introspective Psychology.” Mind 9 (1884): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. The Principles of Psychology. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1890.Google Scholar
James, William. The Varieties of Religious Experience. 1902. Ed. Marty, Martin E.. London: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Mighall, Robert. A Geography of Victorian Gothic Fiction: Mapping History's Nightmares. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter. The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry. 1873. Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Riquelme, John Paul. “Oscar Wilde's Aesthetic Gothic: Walter Pater, Dark Enlightenment, and The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Modern Fiction Studies 46.3 (2000): 610–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seagroatt, Heather. “Hard Science, Soft Psychology, and Amorphous Art in The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Studies in English Literature 38 (1998): 741–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, John. Oscar Wilde. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip E. II, and Helfand, Michael S.. “The Context of the Text.” Wilde, Oscar Wilde's Oxford Notebooks. 5–34.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. “Progress: Its Law and Cause.” 1857. Essays: Scientific, Political, and Speculative. 4th ed. Vol. 1. London: Williams and Norgate, 1883. 1–54.Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie, and Pollock, Frederick, eds. Lectures and Essays. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1879.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis. The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and Other Tales of Terror. Ed. Mighall, Robert. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar
Sully, James. “Genius and Insanity.” Nineteenth Century 17 (1885): 948–69.Google Scholar
Sully, James. The Human Mind: A Text-Book of Psychology. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green, 1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sully, James. Rev. of Der menschliche Wille vom Standpunkte der neueren Entwicklungstheorien, by G. H. Schneider. Mind 8 (1883): 126–32.Google Scholar
Sully, James. “The Undefinable in Art.” Cornhill Magazine 38 (1878): 559–72.Google Scholar
Thurschwell, Pamela. Literature, Technology and Magical Thinking, 1880–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. Oscar Wilde's Oxford Notebooks: A Portrait of Mind in the Making. Ed. Smith II, Philip E. and Helfand, Michael S.. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. 1891. Ed. Mighall, Robert. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar