Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:59:45.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“THE GRAND STILL MIRROR OF ETERNITY”: TEMPORAL DUALISM AND SUBJECTIFICATION IN CARLYLE AND DICKENS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2010

Justin Prystash
Justin Prystash*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Carlyle praises “wondrous Dualism” in Past and Present, he invokes a model for conceptualizing man's role in the world that held widespread, even hegemonic currency in mid-Victorian culture. The centrality of dualist discourse during the mid-Victorian period, thanks in part to Carlyle's translations of German literature and philosophy in the 1830s, cannot be overstated. Carlyle argues that dualism transhistorically frames all human activity: “In wondrous Dualism, then [in the year 1200] as now, lived nations of breathing men; alternating, in all ways, between Light and Dark; between joy and sorrow, between rest and toil” (50; bk. 2, ch. 1). The subject “man” – I use the masculine advisedly – endlessly oscillates between the opposing elements that constitute the universe. This, for Carlyle, is the position of all men. To be heroic, however, one must recognize and negotiate the most wondrous dualism of all, time and eternity: “this Earthly life, and its riches and possessions, and good and evil hap, are not intrinsically a reality at all, but are a shadow of realities eternal, infinite; that this Time-world, as an air-image, fearfully emblematic, plays and flickers in the grand still mirror of Eternity; and man's little Life has Duties that are great, that are alone great, and go up to Heaven and down to Hell” (72; bk. 2, ch. 6). Minor dualisms are subsumed in the opposition between “Time-world” and “Eternity,” and in the “mirror” of the latter, man discerns himself: his ultimate insignificance, yet the greatness of his “Duties.” Carlyle emphasizes that these duties demand the payment of obedience to one's temporal and eternal superiors – heroic ancestors, captains of industry, colonial governors, and God. Only then can heroic men once again be born, like the laboring Hercules or the humble Christ, from temporal-eternal intercourse.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 89 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. Brewster, Ben. New York: Monthly Review, 2001. 85–126.Google Scholar
Andrews, Malcolm. Dickens and the Grown-up Child. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. How Novels Think: The Limits of Individualism From 1719–1900. New York: Columbia UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Berry, Laura C. The Child, the State, and the Victorian Novel. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1999.Google Scholar
Brontë, Emily. Wuthering Heights. New York: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Brown, Callum. The Decline of Christian Britain: Understanding Secularization, 1800–2000. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Buckley, Jerome. The Triumph of Time: A Study of the Victorian Concepts of Time, History, Progress, and Decadence. Cambridge: Belknap, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, Janice. The Sense of an Audience: Dickens, Thackeray, and George Eliot at Mid-Century. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1981.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. “Characteristics.” Tennyson 36–69.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. “Occasional Discourse on the Nigger Question.” Thomas Carlyle: Critical and Miscellaneous Essays. Vol. 4. London: Chapman and Hall, 1899.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. Past and Present. Ed. Altick, Richard D.. New York: New York UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. Sartor Resartus. Tennyson 82–272.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. “Shooting Niagara: And After?” Thomas Carlyle: Critical and Miscellaneous Essays. Vol. 5. London: Chapman and Hall, 1899.Google Scholar
Crawford, Brigid Lowe. “Charles Dickens, Uncommercial Space-Time Traveller: Dombey and Son and the Ethics of History.” Dickens Quarterly 19.4 (2002): 187–219.Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1989.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Bleak House. New York: Bantam, 1985.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Dombey and Son. Ed. Sanders, Andrew. New York: Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times. Ed. Schlicke, Paul. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “The Noble Savage.” ‘Gone Astray’ and Other Papers From Household Words 1851–59. Ed. Slater, Michael. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1999. 141–48.Google Scholar
Driver, Felix. Geography Militant: Cultures of Exploration and Empire. Malden: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage, 1977.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Michael. Carlyle and Dickens. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1972.Google Scholar
Hall, Catherine. “The Economy of Intellectual Prestige: Thomas Carlyle, John Stuart Mill, and the Case of Governor Eyre.” Cultural Critique 12 (Spring 1989): 167–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Jude the Obscure. 1895. New York: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
Kern, Stephen. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1918. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Larson, Janet L. Dickens and the Broken Scripture. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1985.Google Scholar
Lawes, Kim. Paternalism and Politics: The Revival of Paternalism in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain. New York: St. Martin's, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, George. Dying to Know: Scientific Epistemology and Narrative in Victorian England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupton, Christina. “Walking on Flowers: The Kantian Aesthetics of Hard Times.” ELH 70 (2003): 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, Anne. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Moore, Grace. Dickens and Empire: Discourses of Class, Race and Colonialism in the Works of Charles Dickens. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Morrow, John. Thomas Carlyle. New York: Hambledon Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patricia. Time is of the Essence: Temporality, Gender, and the New Woman. Albany: SUNY P, 2001.Google Scholar
Nixon, Jude V. “The Carlyle-Dickens Traffic: Slavery in the Americas.” Carlyle Studies Annual 20 (2001): 27–58.Google Scholar
Oddie, William. Dickens and Carlyle: The Question of Influence. London: Centenary, 1972.Google Scholar
Plotz, Judith. Romanticism and the Vocation of Childhood. New York: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation, 1830–1864. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995.Google Scholar
Shelston, Alan, ed. Charles Dickens: Dombey and Son and Little Dorrit, A Casebook. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1985.Google Scholar
Sorensen, David. “An Instinctive Kantian: Carlyle, Kant and ‘The Vital Interests of Men.’ ” Carlyle Studies Annual 18 (1998): 53–63.Google Scholar
Tennyson, G. B. A Carlyle Reader. Acton: Copley, 1999.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. “Time, Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism.” Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture. New York: New, 1993. 352–403.Google Scholar
Vincent, Deirdre. The Eternity of Being: On the Experience of Time in Goethe's Faust. Bonn: Bouvier, 1987.Google Scholar
Wiener, Joel H., ed. Great Britain: Foreign Policy and the Span of Empire, 1689–1971: A Documentary History. Vol. 2. New York: Chelsea, 1972.Google Scholar