Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:38:22.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foucault, Dickens, and David Copperfield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Gareth Cordery
Gareth Cordery
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Margaret atwood's narrator in Bodily Harm, reminiscing about her childhood, says: “I learned to listen for what wasn't being said, because it was usually more important than what was” (55). Making a similar point, in The History of Sexuality Foucault writes that “There is not one but many silences, and they are an integral part of the strategies that underlie and permeate discourses” (1: 27). If we read David Copperfield in this way — listening to the silences, as well as attending closely to what is being said — the narrative which emerges from the surface bildungsroman is very different from the traditional story of David who learns that “there can be no disparity in marriage like unsuitability of mind and purpose,” and that his marriage to Dora was “the first mistaken impulse of an undisciplined heart” (ch. 45; 733). In this surface narrative David, suitably chastened, is released to marry the boring Agnes by the fortuitous death of the unfortunate Dora. Many critics have commented wisely on David's emotional and psychological development. What I want to suggest is that, while the surface story traces the disciplining of David's emotions, there is another narrative which tells of a different kind of disciplining, one that subjects David to a variety of social norms, rules, and regulations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Spring 1998 , pp. 71 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Atwood, Margaret. Bodily Harm. London: Virago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Brodhead, Richard. “Sparing the Rod: Discipline and Fiction in Antebellum America.” Representations 21 (1988): 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Philip. Dickens and Education. London: Macmillan, 1965.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Bleak House. Ed. Page, Norman. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. David Copperfield. Ed. Blount, Trevor. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Letters of Charles Dickens. Pilgrim Edition. Ed. Tillotson, Kathleen. Vol. 4. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Public Readings. Ed. Collins, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Criticism and Ideology. London: Verso, 1977.Google Scholar
Eigner, Edward M. “David Copperfield and the Benevolent Spirit.” Dickens Studies Annual 14 (1985): 1–15.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Monica. “Family Plot: The Bleak House of Victorian Romance.” Victorian Newsletter 76 (1989): 5–17.Google Scholar
Forster, John. The Life of Charles Dickens. Ed. Hoppe, A.J.. 2 vols. London: Dent, 1969.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. 2 vols. New York: Random House, 1980.Google Scholar
Malone, Cynthia Northcutt. “The Fixed Eye and the Rolling Eye: Surveillance and Discipline in Hard Times.” Studies in the Novel 21 (1989): 14–26.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: California UP, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musselwhite, David. Partings Welded Together: Politics and Desire in the Nineteenth Century Novel. London: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Nead, Lynda. Myths of Sexuality: Representations of Women in Victorian Britain. New York: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Needham, Gwendolen. “The Undisciplined Heart of David Copperfield.” Nineteenth Century Fiction 9 (1954): 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England. London: Virago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, ed. The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Natalie, and Ronald, A. Schroeder. “Betsey Trotwood and Jane Murdstone: Dickensian Doubles.” Studies in the Novel 21 (1989): 268–78.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Mark. Henry James and the Art of Power. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Vanden Bossche, Chris R. “Cookery Not Rookery: Family and Class in David Copperfield.” Dickens Studies Annual 15 (1986): 87–109.Google Scholar
Welsh, Alexander. From Copyright to Copperfield: The Identity of Dickens. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar