Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:53:02.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enlarging the Heart: L. E. L.'s “The Improvisatrice,” Hemans's “Properzia Rossi,” and Barrett Browning's Aurora Leigh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Margot K. Louis
Margot K. Louis
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Elizabeth barrett browning's relation to her female predecessors was complex, conflicted, and rewarding. In Aurora Leigh we see both the heroine and her creator grow from poets who attempt to prove themselves in traditionally masculine terms, into poets who engage with a feminine tradition of sentimental verse which they resist and criticize but nevertheless find of essential value. Only by viewing the poem against the backdrop of the sentimental tradition can we fully appreciate Barrett Browning's challenge to the cult of privacy and the doctrine of separate spheres, her dual emphasis on poetry as at once a job requiring doggedness and a vocation requiring wide social and religious vision, and, finally, her sense of the connection between herself and her female predecessors. Such poets as Felicia Hemans and L. E. L. (Letitia Elizabeth Landon) stand in a relation to Barrett Browning which resembles the unsentimental aunt's relation to Aurora in Book 1 of Aurora Leigh: there is more conflict than sympathy in the relationship; the older woman represents a version of femininity which the younger must at all costs resist; and yet the older woman leaves the younger a legacy which is both narrow and enabling, an essential basis for the young poet's future achievement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Spring 1998 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Barry, Kathleen. Susan B. Anthony: A Biography of a Singular Feminist. New York: Ballantine, 1988.Google Scholar
Bell, Susan Groag, and Offen, Karen M., eds. Women, the Family, and Freedom: The Debate in Documents. 2 vols. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Elizabeth Barrett. Aurora Leigh and Other Poems. Ed. Kaplan, Cora. London: Women's Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Browning, Elizabeth Barrett. The Letters of Elizabeth Barrett Browning to Mary Russell Mitford 1836–1854. Ed. Raymond, Meredith B. and Sullivan, Mary Rose. 3 vols. Winfield: Wedgestone, 1983.Google Scholar
Byrd, Deborah. “Combating an Alien Tyranny: Elizabeth Barrett Browning's Evolution as a Feminist Poet.” Browning Institute Studies 15 (1987): 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, Terry. “The Spectralization of the Other in The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Nussbaum and Brown 231–53.Google Scholar
David, Deirdre. Intellectual Women and Victorian Patriarchy. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Sarah. The Mothers of England: Their Influence and Responsibility. London: Jackson, n.d.Google Scholar
Gelpi, Barbara Charlesworth. “‘Verses with a Good Deal about Sucking’: Percy Bysshe Shelley and Christina Rossetti.” Influence and Resistance in Nineteenth-Century English Poetry. Ed. Blank, G. Kim and Louis, Margot K.. London: Macmillan, 1993. 150–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemans, Felicia. The Poetical Works of Mrs. Felicia Hemans. Ed. Rossetti, William Michael. London: Ward, Lock, 1873.Google Scholar
Landon, Letitia Elizabeth. Poetical Works of Letitia Elizabeth Landon. 2 vols. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1853.Google Scholar
Leighton, Angela. Victorian Women Poets: Writing Against the Heart. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1992.Google Scholar
Markley, Robert. “Sentimentality as Performance: Shaftesbury, Sterne, and the Theatrics of Virtue.” Nussbaum and Brown 210–30.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome J. “‘My Brain is Feminine’: Byron and the Poetry of Deception.” Byron: Augustan and Romantic. Ed. Rutherford, Andrew. London: Macmillan, 1990. 26–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermin, Dorothy. Elizabeth Barrett Browning: The Origins of a New Poetry. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Moers, Ellen. Literary Women. New York: Doubleday, 1976.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Felicity, and Brown, Laura, eds. The New Eighteenth Century. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Patmore, Coventry. The Angel in the House. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1863.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Margaret, ed. Aurora Leigh. Athens: Ohio UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Roberts, Michèle. All the selves I was. London: Virago, 1995.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Julie, ou La Nouvelle Héloise. Ed. Pomeau, René. Paris: Garnier, 1988.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. Sesame and Lilies. London: Smith, Elder, 1865.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Glennis. “Letitia Landon and the Victorian Improvisatrice: The Construction of L. E. L.” Victorian Poetry 30 (1992): 1–17.Google Scholar
Stone, Marjorie. “Genre Subversion and Gender Inversion: The Princess and Aurora Leigh.” Victorian Poetry 25 (1987): 101–27.Google Scholar
Sulloway, Alison. Jane Austen and the Province of Womanhood. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutphin, Christine. “Revising Old Scripts: The Fusion of Independence and Intimacy in Aurora Leigh” Browning Institute Studies 15 (1987): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Beverly. “‘School-Miss Alfred’ and ‘Materfamilias’: Female Sexuality and the Poetic Voice in The Princess and Aurora Leigh.” Gender and Discourse in Victorian Literature and Art. Ed. Harrison, Antony H. and Taylor, Beverly. DeKalb: Northern Illinois UP, 1992. 5–29.Google Scholar