Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:32:29.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COSMETIC TRAGEDIES: FAILED MASQUERADE IN WILKIE COLLINS'S THE LAW AND THE LADY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Aviva Briefel
Aviva Briefel*
Affiliation:
Bowdoin College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Inasmuch as they offer advice on how to improve appearances, nineteenth-century beauty manuals also vividly describe the dangers of putting on a face. The consequences of using cosmetics – often comprised of toxic ingredients such as arsenic, mercury, and lead – might range from the discomfort of surface irritation to the fatality of poisoning. Several manuals recount the unfortunate story of Lady Mary Montagu, who suffered an allergic reaction to a popular cosmetic, the Genuine Balm of Mecca, which led her face to turn red and swell “to a very extraordinary size . . . . It remained in this tormentable state three days, during which you may be sure I passed my time very ill” (Toilette of Health 64). Another woman succumbed to an equally unfortunate fate as the facial powder, or “pearl white,” she wore to a scientific demonstration suddenly turned black in an adverse reaction to the chemicals used in the experiment. In an even more tragic case, “Mrs. S, being much troubled with pimples, applied an alum poultice to her face, which was soon followed by a stroke of the palsy, and terminated in her death” (Clark iv, 46). These stories caution that beautification through artificial means may eradicate the very self that had sought improvement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , September 2009 , pp. 463 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Angeloglou, Maggie. A History of Make-Up. London: Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
“Arsenic-Eaters.” Chambers's Journal 27 Jun. 1885: 421–23.Google Scholar
The Book of Health & Beauty: Or, The Toilette of Rank and Fashion. London: Joseph Thomas, 1837.Google Scholar
Brinton, D. G. and Napheys, Geo. H.. Personal Beauty: How to Cultivate and Preserve It in Accordance with the Laws of Health. Springfield: W. J. Holland, 1870.Google Scholar
Burgin, Victor, Donald, James, and Kaplan, Cora, eds. Formations of Fantasy. London: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jimmy Powdrell. A Most Curious Murder: The Madeleine Smith Story. 1997. 22 Dec. 2006. http://www.amostcuriousmurder.com/. Web. 11 Feb. 2007.Google Scholar
Clark, Sir James. The Ladies’ Guide to Beauty. New York: Barrett, 184?.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. The Law and the Lady. London: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
Corson, Richard. Fashions in Makeup: From Ancient to Modern Times. London: Peter Owen, 2003.Google Scholar
Cowie, Elizabeth. Representing the Woman: Cinema and Psychoanalysis. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Robert. The Connexion of Health and Beauty: or, The Dependence of a Pleasing Face and Figure on Physical, Intellectual, and Moral Regulation. London: John Chapman, 1857.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Dombey and Son. New York: Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. “Film and the Masquerade: Theorising the Female Spectator.” Feminist Film Theory: A Reader. Ed. Thornham, Sue. New York: New York UP, 1999. 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, Maria. “Out of Debt out of Danger.” Tales and Novels. Vol. 2. New York: AMS, 1967. 129–59.Google Scholar
The Elixir of Beauty: A Book for the Toilet-Table. London: H. G. Clarke, 1848.Google Scholar
“Fashionable Forgery.” Punch 23 July 1870: 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Finishing for Faces.” Punch 20 Apr. 1878: 172.Google Scholar
Flugel, J.C.The Psychology of Clothes. London: Hogarth, 1950.Google Scholar
“Fraudulent Faces.” Punch 9 Jan. 1864: 19.Google Scholar
Gates, Barbara, T. Victorian Suicide: Mad Crimes and Sad Histories. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. Durham: Duke UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen. “Joan Riviere and the Masquerade.” Burgin, Donald, and Kaplan, eds. 45–61.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Karin. “Plain Faces, Weird Cases: Domesticating the Law in Collins's The Law and the Lady and the Trial of Madeleine Smith.” Reality's Dark Light: The Sensational Wilkie Collins. Ed. Bachman, Maria K. and Richard Cox, Don. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 2003. 283–312.Google Scholar
Jesse, F. Tennyson, ed. Trial of Madeleine Smith. London: William Hodge, 1927.Google Scholar
Kingsford, Anna. Health, Beauty, and the Toilet: Letters to Ladies from a Lady Doctor. 2nd ed. London: Frederick Warne, 1886.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. “God and the Jouissance of The Woman.” Mitchell and Rose, eds. 137–48.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. “The Meaning of the Phallus.” Mitchell and Rose, eds. 74–85.Google Scholar
MacCannell, Dean and Juliet, Flower. “The Beauty System.” The Ideology of Conduct: Essays on Literature and the History of Sexuality. Ed. Armstrong, Nancy and Tennenhouse, Leonard. New York: Methuen, 1987. 206–38.Google Scholar
MacGowan, Douglas. Murder in Victorian Scotland: The Trial of Madeleine Smith. Westport: Praeger, 1999.Google Scholar
Maguire, Kerry. “The Cloak of Definition: Fantasies of Feminine Identity.” Literature and Psychology 46.3 (2000): 43–64.Google Scholar
Mangum, Teresa. “Wilkie Collins, Detection, and Deformity.” Dickens Studies Annual 26 (1998): 285–310.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A.The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet, and Jacqueline, Rose, eds. Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the École Freudienne. Trans. Jacqueline Rose New York: Norton, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peiss, Kathy. Hope in a Jar: The Making of America's Beauty Culture. New York: Metropolitan, 1998.Google Scholar
Pollard, Tanya. “Beauty's Poisonous Properties.” Shakespeare Studies 27 (1999): 187–210.Google Scholar
Power, Susan C. The Ugly-Girl Papers; or, Hints for the Toilet. New York: Harper, 1874.Google Scholar
Riviere, Joan. “Womanliness as a Masquerade.” Burgin, Donald, and Kaplan, eds. 35–44.Google Scholar
Rose, Jacqueline. “Introduction – II.” Mitchell and Rose, eds. 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruppert, Anna. Dermatology: A Book of Beauty. London: Anna Ruppert, 1892.Google Scholar
Sayre, Lewis A.Three Cases of Lead Palsy from the Use of a Cosmetic Called ‘Laird's Bloom of Youth.’ Philadelphia: Collins, 1869.Google Scholar
Scoffern, J. “Cosmetics.” Belgravia 4 (1867): 208–16.Google Scholar
Scoffern, J.. “Cosmetics for the Hair.” Belgravia 5 (1868): 383–91.Google Scholar
Shannon, Brent. “ReFashioning Men: Fashion, Masculinity, and the Cultivation of the Male Consumer in Britain, 1860–1914.” Victorian Studies 46.4 (2004): 597–630. Project Muse. Web. 10 Feb. 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. “Disability as Masquerade.” Literature and Medicine 23.1 (2004): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmel, Georg. “Adornment.” The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Trans. and ed. Wolff., Kurt H.Glencoe: Free Press, 1950. 338–44.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jenny Bourne. Introduction. The Law and the Lady, by Collins, Wilkie. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. vii–xxiv.Google Scholar
The Toilette of Health, Beauty, and Fashion. Boston: Allen & Ticknor, 1834.Google Scholar
Walker, Mrs. Alexander. Female Beauty: As Preserved and Improved by Regimen, Cleanliness and Dress. London: Thomas Hurst, 1837.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. Ed. Page, Norman. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 1998.Google Scholar
Williams, Neville. Powder and Paint: A History of the Englishwoman's Toilet. London: Longmans, Green, 1957.Google Scholar